• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估全州范围内居家生态系统家庭为有严重情绪障碍的青年提供的治疗方案的再入院率。

Evaluating Readmission Rates for a Statewide In-Home Ecosystemic Family-Based Treatment Program for Youth with Serious Emotional Disturbance.

机构信息

Community Care Behavioral Health Organization, UPMC Insurance Services Division, 339 Sixth Ave., Suite 1300, Pittsburgh, PA, 15222, USA.

The Center for Family-Based Training, 1 Bala Ave., Suite 125, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004, USA.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2024 Oct;60(7):1385-1398. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01295-2. Epub 2024 May 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-024-01295-2
PMID:38809288
Abstract

Family Based Mental Health Services (FBMHS) with an embedded clinical model, Ecosystemic Structural Family Therapy, is an intervention designed for youth with a serious emotional disturbance (SED) who are at risk of out-of-home placement. The current evaluation examines the association between receipt of FBMHS and rates of out-of-home and community-based care during and after an episode of FBMHS. We identified 25,016 Medicaid-enrolled youth ages 3 to 17 years with receipt of a new FBMHS episode from 1/1/2015 to 6/30/2021. 14% of youth received out-of-home services. Rates of out-of-home service decreased during receipt of FBMHS (14.25-6.98%, p < .0001) and remained lower 6 months following discharge (to 6.95%, p < .0001). Short and longer doses of service were both associated with decreased rates of out-of-home services. FBMHS has been scaled across a large geographic area and is associated with lower rates of out-of-home placement for youth with SED.

摘要

家庭为基础的心理健康服务(FBMHS)与嵌入式临床模式——生态系统结构家庭治疗,是为有严重情绪障碍(SED)风险的青少年设计的干预措施,这些青少年有离家安置的风险。目前的评估考察了在 FBMHS 期间和之后,接受 FBMHS 与离家和社区护理比率之间的关联。我们确定了 25016 名年龄在 3 至 17 岁之间的 Medicaid 登记青少年,他们在 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间接受了新的 FBMHS 疗程。14%的青少年接受了离家服务。在接受 FBMHS 的过程中,离家服务的比率下降(14.25%-6.98%,p<0.0001),出院后 6 个月仍保持较低水平(6.95%,p<0.0001)。短期和长期的服务剂量都与离家服务的比率下降有关。FBMHS 在一个大的地理区域得到了推广,与有 SED 的青少年离家安置率降低有关。

相似文献

1
Evaluating Readmission Rates for a Statewide In-Home Ecosystemic Family-Based Treatment Program for Youth with Serious Emotional Disturbance.评估全州范围内居家生态系统家庭为有严重情绪障碍的青年提供的治疗方案的再入院率。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Oct;60(7):1385-1398. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01295-2. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Pursuing cost-effectiveness in mental health service delivery for youth with complex needs.为有复杂需求的青少年提供心理健康服务时追求成本效益。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2011 Jun;14(2):73-83.
3
Medicaid Waivers for Youth with Severe Emotional Disturbance: Associations with Public Health Coverage, Unmet Mental Health Needs & Adequacy of Health Coverage.医疗补助计划(Medicaid)对有严重情绪障碍的青年的豁免:与公共卫生保险覆盖范围、心理健康需求未得到满足和健康保险覆盖范围的充足性的关联。
Community Ment Health J. 2021 Nov;57(8):1449-1463. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00759-5. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
4
Identifying Under- And Overutilization Patterns For Idaho Youth With Serious Emotional Disturbance.识别爱达荷州有严重情绪障碍的青少年的利用不足和过度利用模式。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Aug;43(8):1109-1116. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01256.
5
Medicaid Cost Trajectories for Children With Serious Emotional Disturbance: The HCBS Waiver Program Versus Targeted Case Management.医疗补助计划下患有严重情绪障碍儿童的成本变化轨迹:以社区为基础的综合性服务模式与目标个案管理模式的对比。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Nov 1;69(11):1160-1166. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700537. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
6
COVID-19 Modifications in Public Home- and Community-Based Services for Children with Mental Health Needs.COVID-19 对有心理健康需求的儿童的公共家庭和社区服务的修改。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Jan;51(1):85-102. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01315-5. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
7
Double whammy? Rural youth with serious emotional disturbance and the transition to adulthood.双重打击?患有严重情绪障碍的农村青年与向成年期的过渡
J Rural Health. 2009 Fall;25(4):399-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00251.x.
8
State variation in out-of-home Medicaid mental health services for children and youth: an examination of residential treatment and inpatient hospital services.儿童和青少年 Medicaid 精神健康服务的外展服务的州差异:对住院治疗和住院医院服务的考察。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Jul;37(4):318-26. doi: 10.1007/s10488-009-0235-x. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
9
Do High Fidelity Wraparound Services for Youth with Serious Emotional Disturbances Save Money in the Long-Term?为患有严重情绪障碍的青少年提供高保真环绕服务从长远来看能省钱吗?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2017 Dec 1;20(4):167-175.
10
Home-based treatment, rates of ambulatory follow-up, and psychiatric rehospitalization in a Medicaid managed care population.医疗补助管理式医疗人群中的居家治疗、门诊随访率及精神科再住院情况。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2002 Nov;29(4):466-75. doi: 10.1007/BF02287352.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of and Relationship Between Caregiver Adversity Scores and Child Client Eco-systemic Structural Family Therapy (ESFT) Outcome: Implications for Family Based Mental Health Services (FBMHS).照顾者逆境评分的流行率及其与儿童客户生态系统结构家庭治疗(ESFT)结果的关系:对基于家庭的心理健康服务(FBMHS)的启示。
Community Ment Health J. 2022 Jul;58(5):895-906. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00897-4. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
2
Manuscript: Defining Quality Standards for Intensive Home Based Treatment Programs for Youth with Serious Emotional Disorders.文献:为有严重情绪障碍的青年制定强化家庭治疗计划的质量标准。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Nov;48(6):1065-1088. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01116-8. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
To use or not to use propensity score matching?
是否使用倾向评分匹配?
Pharm Stat. 2021 Jan;20(1):15-24. doi: 10.1002/pst.2051. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
4
Institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation of children 2: policy and practice recommendations for global, national, and local actors.儿童的机构收容与非机构收容2:针对全球、国家及地方行为体的政策与实践建议
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Aug;4(8):606-633. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30060-2. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
5
Psychiatric Readmission of Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.儿童和青少年的精神科再入院:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Mar 1;71(3):269-279. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900234. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
6
Placement and Delinquency Outcomes Among System-Involved Youth Referred to Multisystemic Therapy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.接受多系统治疗的涉系统青少年的安置与犯罪结局:倾向得分匹配分析
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Nov;44(6):853-866. doi: 10.1007/s10488-017-0797-y.
7
Changes in mental health outcomes with the intensive in-home child and adolescent psychiatric service: a multi-informant, latent consensus approach.强化家庭儿童和青少年精神科服务对心理健康结果的影响:一种多信息提供者的潜在共识方法。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2016 Mar;25(1):33-43. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1477. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
8
Improving community-based mental health care for children: translating knowledge into action.改善儿童社区心理健康护理:将知识转化为行动。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013 Jan;40(1):6-22. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0450-8.
9
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.倾向得分法在观察性研究中减少混杂效应的介绍
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
10
Treatment programs for youth with emotional and behavioral disorders: an outcome study of two alternate approaches.针对有情绪和行为障碍青少年的治疗方案:两种替代方法的结果研究。
Ment Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun;4(2):85-96. doi: 10.1023/a:1015200200316.