Department of Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Lankenau Medical Center, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, PA, 19096, USA.
Lankenau Medical Center, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, PA, 19096, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3976-3983. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10895-8. Epub 2024 May 29.
Transanal surgery facilitates organ preservation in select patients with benign and early malignant rectal lesions to avoid the functional consequences of radical surgery. The transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) platform created a standard for local excision with lower margin positivity and recurrence rates than traditional transanal excision. The single-port robot (SP r) presents a promising alternative transanal platform. The goal of this study was to compare perioperative and pathologic outcomes of TEM and SP r for excision of rectal lesions.
A review of consecutive patients who underwent local excision of rectal lesions at a tertiary referral center from 1/2001 to 5/2022 was performed. Cases were stratified into TEM or SP rTAMIS in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort, adjusting for all baseline characteristics. Clinical, tumor-specific, and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ, and Mann-Whitney U-tests. The main outcomes were oncologic quality measures, complications, and operative time.
Matching resulted 50 patients in each cohort. Groups had similar age, gender, body mass index, comorbidity, diagnosis, lesion characteristics, and neoadjuvant chemoradiation rates. There were no intraoperative complications in either cohort. Three SP rTAMIS cases were converted intraoperatively; there were no conversions in TEM. SP rTAMIS had significantly shorter operative times than TEM (mean 104 vs. 245, p = 0.027). The rates of positive distal margins (2% TEM, 0% SP rTAMIS) and piecemeal resection (4% TEM, 0% SP rTAMIS) were similar. SP rTAMIS had significantly lower postoperative morbidity rates than TEM (9% vs. 20%, p = 0.031). There was no mortality in either cohort.
SP robotics provided high-quality outcomes similar to TEM for local excision of rectal lesions. SP robotics had faster operative time with comparable clinical and oncologic outcomes to TEM. These early data are promising for expanding use of SP robotic platforms.
经肛门微创手术能够保留选择出的良性和早期恶性直肠病变患者的器官功能,避免根治性手术带来的功能丧失。经肛门内镜微创手术(TEM)为局部切除创造了标准,其切缘阳性率和复发率低于传统的经肛门切除术。单孔机器人(SP r)为经肛门微创手术提供了一个很有前途的替代平台。本研究旨在比较 TEM 和 SP r 切除直肠病变的围手术期和病理结果。
回顾性分析了 2001 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月在一家三级转诊中心接受直肠病变局部切除的连续患者。采用 1:1 倾向评分匹配队列对病例进行 TEM 或 SP rTAMIS 分层,调整所有基线特征。采用 χ 2 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较临床、肿瘤特异性和围手术期结果。主要结果是肿瘤学质量指标、并发症和手术时间。
匹配后每组各有 50 例患者。两组患者的年龄、性别、体重指数、合并症、诊断、病变特征和新辅助放化疗率相似。两组均无术中并发症。3 例 SP rTAMIS 术中转为开腹,TEM 无中转开腹。SP rTAMIS 的手术时间明显短于 TEM(平均 104 比 245,p=0.027)。远端切缘阳性率(TEM 2%,SP rTAMIS 0%)和分片切除率(TEM 4%,SP rTAMIS 0%)相似。SP rTAMIS 的术后并发症发生率明显低于 TEM(9%比 20%,p=0.031)。两组均无死亡病例。
SP 机器人为直肠病变的局部切除提供了与 TEM 相似的高质量结果。SP 机器人的手术时间更短,临床和肿瘤学结果与 TEM 相当。这些早期数据为扩展 SP 机器人平台的应用提供了希望。