Department of Vegetable and Animal Production, Suluova Vocational School, Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey.
Department of Environmental Engineering, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jun;31(27):39098-39119. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33732-w. Epub 2024 May 29.
Physically based or data-driven models can be used for understanding basinwide hydrological processes and creating predictions for future conditions. Physically based models use physical laws and principles to represent hydrological processes. In contrast, data-driven models focus on input-output relationships. Although both approaches have found applications in hydrology, studies that compare these approaches are still limited for data-scarce, semi-arid basins with altered hydrological regimes. This study aims to compare the performances of a physically based model (Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)) and a data-driven model (Nonlinear AutoRegressive eXogenous model (NARX)) for reservoir volume and streamflow prediction in a data-scarce semi-arid region. The study was conducted in the Tersakan Basin, a semi-arid agricultural basin in Türkiye, where the basin hydrology was significantly altered due to reservoirs (Ladik and Yedikir Reservoir) constructed for irrigation purposes. The models were calibrated and validated for streamflow and reservoir volumes. The results show that (1) NARX performed better in the prediction of water volumes of Ladik and Yedikir Reservoirs and streamflow at the basin outlet than SWAT (2). The SWAT and NARX models both provided the best performance when predicting water volumes at the Ladik reservoir. Both models provided the second best performance during the prediction of water volumes at the Yedikir reservoir. The model performances were the lowest for prediction of streamflow at the basin outlet (3). Comparison of physically based and data-driven models is challenging due to their different characteristics and input data requirements. In this study, the data-driven model provided higher performance than the physically based model. However, input data used for establishing the physically based model had several uncertainties, which may be responsible for the lower performance. Data-driven models can provide alternatives to physically-based models under data-scarce conditions.
基于物理的或数据驱动的模型可用于了解流域范围内的水文过程并对未来条件进行预测。基于物理的模型使用物理定律和原理来表示水文过程。相比之下,数据驱动的模型侧重于输入-输出关系。尽管这两种方法在水文学中都有应用,但对于数据匮乏、水文状况发生改变的半干旱流域,比较这些方法的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在比较基于物理的模型(土壤和水评估工具 (SWAT))和数据驱动模型(非线性自回归外生模型 (NARX))在土耳其一个数据匮乏的半干旱农业流域内对水库库容和流量预测的性能。该研究在 Tersakan 流域进行,该流域是一个半干旱农业流域,由于为灌溉目的而建造的水库(Ladik 和 Yedikir 水库),流域水文发生了显著变化。对模型进行了流量和水库库容的校准和验证。结果表明:(1) 在预测 Ladik 和 Yedikir 水库的水量以及流域出口的流量方面,NARX 比 SWAT 表现更好;(2) SWAT 和 NARX 模型在预测 Ladik 水库的水量时都提供了最佳性能;在预测 Yedikir 水库的水量时,两个模型都提供了第二好的性能;在预测流域出口的流量时,模型性能最低;(3) 由于具有不同的特征和输入数据要求,因此对基于物理的和数据驱动的模型进行比较具有挑战性。在本研究中,数据驱动模型的性能优于基于物理的模型。然而,用于建立基于物理的模型的输入数据存在一些不确定性,这可能是导致性能较低的原因。在数据匮乏的情况下,数据驱动模型可以为基于物理的模型提供替代方案。