Liang Pei-Yun, Huang Yu-Jing, Chen Hao-Ming, Cao Hao-Heng, Wu Yin-Bing, Chen Ting-Ting, Chen Yi, Fan Hong-Xia, Zheng Jun-Xia
School of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Science, Guangdong University of Technology Guangzhou 510006, China.
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2024 Apr;49(8):2076-2087. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20231219.201.
Raphani Semen, with both edible and medicinal values, is a typical Chinese herbal medicine with different effects before and after processing. The raw helps ascending and the cooked helps descending. This paper comprehensively summarizes the differences in chemical constituents and pharmacological effects between raw and processed Raphani Semen that are reported in recent years. Based on the principle of quality markers(Q-markers) of traditional Chinese medicines, the chemical constituent sources, chemical constituent detection techniques, and correlation between bidirectional regulatory efficacy and chemical constituents are compared between raw and processed Raphani Semen. The results suggest that sulforaphene and glucoraphanin could be used as candidate Q-markers of raw and processed Raphani Semen, respectively. This review is expected to provide a reference for further research on the processing, new drug development, and improvement of safety and effectiveness of Raphani Semen in clinical application.