Kalner Alexander, Küchler Friedrich, Kavallari Ellen, Müller Martin, Seufferlein Thomas, Walter Benjamin M
Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Endosc Int Open. 2024 May 29;12(5):E704-E714. doi: 10.1055/a-2306-9144. eCollection 2024 May.
Sedation of high-risk patients is a relevant issue in interventional endoscopy. This is especially because standard oximetric monitors display only hypoxia and not the preceding hypercapnia. Therefore, the question arises whether use of a nasal positive airway pressure (nPAP) system can decrease the rate of sedation-associated events. A randomized, prospective trial was conducted at University Hospital Ulm, including 98 consecutive patients, identified as high-risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥3) and scheduled for prolonged (>15 minutes) endoscopic procedures. Patients underwent 1:1 randomization to two groups: interventional (nPAP-Mask) and control (conventional oxygen supplementation). Levels of CO were measured noninvasively by transcutaneous capnometry device. The primary outcome was incidence of hypoxia (SpO <90% over 10 seconds) and incidence of severe hypoxia was incidence of SpO <80% over 10 seconds. One of our secondary objectives was to determine if the nPAP-Mask could result in significant CO retention among high-risk patients. Data analysis showed lower incidence of hypoxia in the interventional group (10/47 vs. 31/251) <0.05. Episodes of severe hypoxia (SpO <80% over 10 seconds) were more frequent in the control group (8/51) compared with the intervention group (2/47) <0.05. There was no significant difference in ΔCO levels in the interventional vs. control group (-6.01±7.66 vs. -7.35±8.59 mm Hg). In high-risk patients use of a nasal positive airway pressure system could significantly lower risk of hypoxia, especially in prolonged procedures. The nPAP-Mask does not induce CO retention when compared with conventional oxygen supplementation.
高危患者的镇静是介入性内镜检查中的一个重要问题。这尤其因为标准的血氧饱和度监测仪仅显示低氧情况,而不显示先前的高碳酸血症。因此,使用鼻持续气道正压通气(nPAP)系统是否能降低镇静相关事件的发生率这一问题便随之而来。乌尔姆大学医院进行了一项随机、前瞻性试验,纳入了98例连续的患者,这些患者被确定为高危患者(美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级≥3级),并计划进行延长(>15分钟)的内镜检查。患者按1:1随机分为两组:干预组(nPAP面罩组)和对照组(常规吸氧组)。通过经皮二氧化碳监测仪无创测量二氧化碳水平。主要结局是低氧发生率(SpO₂<90%持续10秒以上),严重低氧发生率是指SpO₂<80%持续10秒以上的发生率。我们的次要目标之一是确定nPAP面罩是否会导致高危患者出现显著的二氧化碳潴留。数据分析显示,干预组的低氧发生率较低(10/47 vs. 31/251,P<0.05)。与干预组(2/47)相比,对照组(8/51)的严重低氧发作(SpO₂<80%持续10秒以上)更为频繁(P<0.05)。干预组与对照组的二氧化碳水平变化差异无统计学意义(-6.01±7.66 vs. -7.35±8.59 mmHg)。在高危患者中,使用鼻持续气道正压通气系统可显著降低低氧风险,尤其是在延长的手术过程中。与常规吸氧相比,nPAP面罩不会导致二氧化碳潴留。