• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国糖减政策的效果。

Outcomes of sugar reduction policies, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

机构信息

Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, England.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Jun 1;102(6):432-439. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.291013. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

DOI:10.2471/BLT.23.291013
PMID:38812797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11132159/
Abstract

Poor diets are the major cause of death and disease globally, driving high levels of obesity and noncommunicable diseases. Cheap, heavily marketed, ultra-processed, energy-dense and nutrient-poor food and drinks that are high in fat, sugar and salt play a major role. The high-sugar content of these products leads to consumption levels much higher than recommended. The World Health Organization recommends that sugar intake should be reduced to just 5% of energy intake by using fiscal policies and food and drink reformulation strategies. Over the previous decade, the government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has implemented several policies aimed at reducing sugar intake. We compare the soft drinks industry levy and the sugar reduction programme, examining how differences in policy design and process may have influenced the outcomes. Success has been mixed: the mandatory levy achieved a reduction in total sugar sales of 34.3%, and the voluntary reduction programme only achieved a 3.5% reduction in sugar levels of key contributors to sugar intake (despite a target of 20%). Both policies can be improved to enhance their impact, for example, by increasing the levy and reducing the sugar content threshold in the soft drinks industry levy, and by setting more stringent subcategory specific targets in the sugar reduction programme. We also recommend that policy-makers should consider applying a similar levy to other discretionary products that are key contributors to sugar intake. Both approaches provide valuable learnings for future policy in the United Kingdom and globally.

摘要

不良饮食是导致全球死亡和疾病的主要原因,导致肥胖和非传染性疾病高发。廉价、大量宣传、超加工、高能量、低营养的食品和饮料在其中扮演了主要角色,这些食品和饮料脂肪、糖和盐含量高。这些产品的高含糖量导致其摄入量远远超过推荐量。世界卫生组织建议,通过财政政策和食品及饮料配方改革策略,将糖摄入量减少到总能量摄入的 5%。在过去十年中,大不列颠及北爱尔兰联合王国政府实施了几项旨在减少糖摄入量的政策。我们比较了软饮料行业征税和减糖计划,研究了政策设计和实施过程中的差异如何影响结果。成效喜忧参半:强制性征税使总糖销售量减少了 34.3%,而自愿性减糖计划仅使糖摄入量主要贡献者的糖含量降低了 3.5%(尽管目标是降低 20%)。这两项政策都可以改进,以提高其影响力,例如提高征税,并降低软饮料行业征税中的糖含量门槛,在减糖计划中为更严格的特定子类别的设定具体目标。我们还建议政策制定者考虑对其他可自由支配的产品征收类似税款,这些产品是糖摄入量的主要贡献者。这两种方法都为英国和全球未来的政策提供了宝贵的经验教训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56b8/11132159/6d3ddf6ca19d/BLT.23.291013-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56b8/11132159/e0a43d0760f4/BLT.23.291013-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56b8/11132159/6d3ddf6ca19d/BLT.23.291013-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56b8/11132159/e0a43d0760f4/BLT.23.291013-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56b8/11132159/6d3ddf6ca19d/BLT.23.291013-F2.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of sugar reduction policies, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.英国糖减政策的效果。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Jun 1;102(6):432-439. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.291013. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
2
Labelling changes in response to a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.对含糖饮料征税引起的标签变化,大不列颠及北爱尔兰联合王国。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Dec 1;97(12):818-827. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.234542. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
3
Anticipatory changes in British household purchases of soft drinks associated with the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国家庭购买软饮料的预期变化与软饮料行业征税公告相关:一项基于对照的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 12;17(11):e1003269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003269. eCollection 2020 Nov.
4
The impact of the UK soft drink industry levy on the soft drink marketplace, 2017-2020: An interrupted time series analysis with comparator series.2017-2020 年英国软饮料行业征税对软饮料市场的影响:基于比较序列的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 6;19(6):e0301890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301890. eCollection 2024.
5
A discourse network analysis of UK newspaper coverage of the "sugar tax" debate before and after the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy.在宣布软饮料行业征税前后,对英国报纸对“糖税”辩论的话语网络分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 2;19(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6799-9.
6
Reductions in sugar sales from soft drinks in the UK from 2015 to 2018.2015 年至 2018 年期间,英国软饮料中的糖销售量减少。
BMC Med. 2020 Jan 13;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1477-4.
7
Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015-19: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国软饮料行业征税的宣布和实施对英国 2015-19 年软饮料的含糖量、价格、产品规格和种类的影响:一项基于控制的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 11;17(2):e1003025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003025. eCollection 2020 Feb.
8
Adolescents' perspectives on soft drinks after the introduction of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: A focus group study using reflexive thematic analysis.英国软饮料行业征税后青少年对软饮料的看法:使用反思性主题分析的焦点小组研究。
Appetite. 2022 Dec 1;179:106305. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106305. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
9
The sugar content of children's and lunchbox beverages sold in the UK before and after the soft drink industry levy.在英国软饮料行业征税前后,儿童和午餐盒饮料的含糖量。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020 Apr;74(4):598-603. doi: 10.1038/s41430-019-0489-7. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
10
Industry views of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: a thematic analysis of elite interviews with food and drink industry professionals, 2018-2020.行业视角下的英国软饮料行业征税:对食品和饮料行业专业人士的精英访谈的主题分析,2018-2020 年。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 9;13(8):e072223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072223.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Aspartame on Glucose, Insulin, and Appetite-Regulating Hormone Responses in Humans: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.阿斯巴甜对人体葡萄糖、胰岛素及食欲调节激素反应的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
Adv Nutr. 2025 May 15;16(7):100449. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100449.
2
Packed Lunch Provision and Consumption in Early Years Settings in Sheffield: A Cross-Sectional Study.谢菲尔德早期教育机构的盒装午餐供应与消费情况:一项横断面研究
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Jun;38(3):e70066. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70066.
3
Are food taxes for healthy eating acceptable? A survey of public attitudes in the UK.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Reformulation Still a Suitable Goal for Sugary Beverage Taxes? A Response to Recent Commentaries.重新配方仍然是含糖饮料税的合适目标吗?对近期评论的回应。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:8366. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8366. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
2
Estimated impact of the UK soft drinks industry levy on childhood hospital admissions for carious tooth extractions: interrupted time series analysis.英国软饮料行业征税对儿童因龋齿拔牙而住院的预估影响:中断时间序列分析
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2023 Dec;6(2):243-252. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000714. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
Industry views of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: a thematic analysis of elite interviews with food and drink industry professionals, 2018-2020.
为促进健康饮食而征收的食品税是否可以接受?英国公众态度调查。
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Apr 17;3(1):e001731. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001731. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
The Contribution of Free Sugars to Energy Intake in Mid to Late Childhood: Comparisons Between Nutrient and Food Group Intakes and Antecedents of Diets High and Low in Free Sugars.游离糖对儿童中晚期能量摄入的贡献:营养素和食物组摄入量的比较以及游离糖含量高和低的饮食的影响因素。
Nutrients. 2024 Dec 4;16(23):4192. doi: 10.3390/nu16234192.
5
Burden of disease attributable to high body mass index: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.归因于高体重指数的疾病负担:对《2021年全球疾病负担研究》数据的分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Sep 24;76:102848. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102848. eCollection 2024 Oct.
行业视角下的英国软饮料行业征税:对食品和饮料行业专业人士的精英访谈的主题分析,2018-2020 年。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 9;13(8):e072223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072223.
4
Reactions of industry and associated organisations to the announcement of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: longitudinal thematic analysis of UK media articles, 2016-18.英国软饮料行业征税公告发布后业界和相关组织的反应:2016-2018 年英国媒体文章的纵向主题分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 7;23(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15190-0.
5
Associations between trajectories of obesity prevalence in English primary school children and the UK soft drinks industry levy: An interrupted time series analysis of surveillance data.英国小学生肥胖率变化轨迹与英国软饮料行业征税的关联:监测数据的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2023 Jan 26;20(1):e1004160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004160. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Outcomes Following Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.对含糖饮料征税的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2215276. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15276.
7
Tolerable upper intake level for dietary sugars.膳食糖的可耐受最高摄入量水平。
EFSA J. 2022 Feb 28;20(2):e07074. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7074. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
Early evidence for the effectiveness of South Africa's legislation on salt restriction in foods: the African-PREDICT study.南非限制食物中盐含量法规有效性的早期证据:非洲 PREDICT 研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 2023 Jan;37(1):42-49. doi: 10.1038/s41371-021-00653-x. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
9
Current perspectives on global sugar consumption: definitions, recommendations, population intakes, challenges and future direction.当前对全球糖消费的看法:定义、建议、人群摄入量、挑战和未来方向。
Nutr Res Rev. 2023 Jun;36(1):1-22. doi: 10.1017/S095442242100024X. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
10
Food Marketing as a Special Ingredient in Consumer Choices: The Main Insights from Existing Literature.作为消费者选择中的特殊因素的食品营销:现有文献的主要见解
Foods. 2020 Nov 12;9(11):1651. doi: 10.3390/foods9111651.