• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为促进健康饮食而征收的食品税是否可以接受?英国公众态度调查。

Are food taxes for healthy eating acceptable? A survey of public attitudes in the UK.

作者信息

Martínez-Jiménez Mario, Brinsden Hannah, Sassi Franco

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics & Policy Innovation, Department of Economics & Public Policy, Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK.

The Food Foundation, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Public Health. 2025 Apr 17;3(1):e001731. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001731. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001731
PMID:40260123
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12010336/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Appropriately designed food taxes can improve diet quality and health. Fiscal levers are used in several countries to combat the rise in obesity and diet-related diseases. This study aims to investigate public attitudes, knowledge and policy preferences regarding food taxes for promoting healthy eating in the UK.

METHODS

A survey was administered through YouGov Plc to a nationally representative sample of 2125 adults, gathering information on: acceptability and support for different types of food taxes, awareness and knowledge of existing taxes and preferences for the characteristics of possible new taxes.

RESULTS

Overall, 48% of respondents support higher taxes on unhealthy foods, rising to 72% if taxes made healthy foods more affordable. Respondents with high socioeconomic status and those living in London showed the highest support. Respondents had limited awareness of existing food and beverage taxes and prioritised discretionary items such as cakes and crisps for possible increased taxation.

CONCLUSIONS

The survey shows a high level of support for taxing unhealthy foods, as well as concern for the affordability of healthy foods. A carefully designed holistic approach to food taxation can be part of a wider public health strategy and can be favourably met by the general population in the UK.

摘要

引言

设计合理的食品税能够改善饮食质量和健康状况。一些国家运用财政杠杆来应对肥胖率上升及与饮食相关疾病的问题。本研究旨在调查英国公众对于促进健康饮食的食品税的态度、认知及政策偏好。

方法

通过舆观调查公司对2125名具有全国代表性的成年人进行了一项调查,收集了以下方面的信息:对不同类型食品税的可接受性和支持度、对现有税收的认知和了解,以及对可能的新税特征的偏好。

结果

总体而言,48%的受访者支持对不健康食品征收更高的税,如果税收能使健康食品更实惠,这一比例将升至72%。社会经济地位较高的受访者以及居住在伦敦的受访者支持率最高。受访者对现有的食品和饮料税了解有限,并且将蛋糕和薯片等非必需食品列为可能提高税收的优先项目。

结论

该调查显示出对不健康食品征税的高度支持,以及对健康食品可负担性的关注。精心设计的食品税收整体方案可以成为更广泛的公共卫生战略的一部分,并能得到英国普通民众的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3401/12010336/9a2140664964/bmjph-3-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3401/12010336/2aa0bc91975e/bmjph-3-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3401/12010336/045f6349c21b/bmjph-3-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3401/12010336/9a2140664964/bmjph-3-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3401/12010336/2aa0bc91975e/bmjph-3-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3401/12010336/045f6349c21b/bmjph-3-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3401/12010336/9a2140664964/bmjph-3-1-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Are food taxes for healthy eating acceptable? A survey of public attitudes in the UK.为促进健康饮食而征收的食品税是否可以接受?英国公众态度调查。
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Apr 17;3(1):e001731. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001731. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Policy lessons from health taxes: a systematic review of empirical studies.健康税的政策教训:实证研究的系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4497-z.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
4
Interventions for preventing eating disorders in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年饮食失调的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(2):CD002891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002891.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
7
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
8
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of sugar reduction policies, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.英国糖减政策的效果。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Jun 1;102(6):432-439. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.291013. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
2
The public health implications of the cost-of-living crisis: outlining mechanisms and modelling consequences.生活成本危机对公共卫生的影响:概述作用机制并模拟后果
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Apr;27:100585. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100585. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
3
Global Coverage and Design of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.
全球含糖饮料税收的覆盖范围和设计。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231412. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1412.
4
Evaluation of Economic and Health Outcomes Associated With Food Taxes and Subsidies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估与食品税和补贴相关的经济和健康结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2214371. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14371.
5
Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in Europe: learning for the future.欧洲的含糖饮料税:为未来而学习。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Apr 1;32(2):273-280. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab211.
6
Citizens' Willingness to Support New Taxes for COVID-19 Measures and the Role of Trust.公民支持为新冠疫情措施开征新税的意愿及信任的作用。
Polit Policy. 2021 Jun;49(3):534-565. doi: 10.1111/polp.12404. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
7
The Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois: Lessons From a Failed Effort.伊利诺伊州库克县的含糖饮料税:失败的教训。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jul;110(7):1009-1016. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305640. Epub 2020 May 21.
8
Nutrition Policy and Individual Struggle to Eat Healthily: The Question of Public Support.营养政策与个人健康饮食的斗争:公共支持的问题。
Nutrients. 2020 Feb 18;12(2):516. doi: 10.3390/nu12020516.
9
Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015-19: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国软饮料行业征税的宣布和实施对英国 2015-19 年软饮料的含糖量、价格、产品规格和种类的影响:一项基于控制的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 11;17(2):e1003025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003025. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
Political and public acceptability of a sugar-sweetened beverages tax: a mixed-method systematic review and meta-analysis.征收含糖饮料税的政治和公众接受度:混合方法系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Sep 4;16(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0843-0.