National TB and Leprosy Program, Ministry of Health, Uganda, 6 Lourdel Road, Wandegeya, Kampala, Uganda.
Department of Statistics, The Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Jun 1;102(6):400-409. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.290641. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
To assess the effectiveness of a community-based tuberculosis and leprosy intervention in which village health teams and health workers conduct door-to-door tuberculosis screening, targeted screenings and contact tracing.
We conducted a before-and-after implementation study in Uganda to assess the effectiveness of the community tuberculosis intervention by looking at reach, outputs, adoption and effectiveness of the intervention. Campaign 1 was conducted in March 2022 and campaign 2 in September 2022. We calculated percentages of targets achieved and compared case notification rates during the intervention with corresponding quarters in the previous year. We also assessed the leprosy screening.
Over 5 days, campaign 1 screened 1 289 213 people (2.9% of the general population), of whom 179 144 (13.9%) fulfilled the presumptive tuberculosis criteria, and 4043 (2.3%) were diagnosed with bacteriologically-confirmed tuberculosis; 3710 (91.8%) individuals were linked to care. In campaign 2, 5 134 056 people (11.6% of the general population) were screened, detecting 428 444 (8.3%) presumptive tuberculosis patients and 8121 (1.9%) bacteriologically-confirmed tuberculosis patients; 5942 individuals (87.1%) were linked to care. The case notification rate increased from 48.1 to 59.5 per 100 000 population in campaign 1, with a case notification rate ratio of 1.24 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.22-1.26). In campaign 2, the case notification rate increased from 45.0 to 71.6 per 100 000 population, with a case notification rate ratio of 1.59 (95% CI: 1.56-1.62). Of the 176 patients identified with leprosy, 137 (77.8%) initiated treatment.
This community tuberculosis screening initiative is effective. However, continuous monitoring and adaptations are needed to overcome context-specific implementation challenges.
评估以社区为基础的结核病和麻风病干预措施的效果,该措施由村级卫生团队和卫生工作者开展上门结核病筛查、有针对性的筛查和接触者追踪。
我们在乌干达开展了一项实施前后研究,通过评估干预措施的覆盖面、产出、采用情况和效果,来评估社区结核病干预措施的效果。第 1 次活动于 2022 年 3 月开展,第 2 次活动于 2022 年 9 月开展。我们计算了目标完成百分比,并将干预期间的病例报告率与前一年同期进行了比较。我们还评估了麻风病筛查情况。
第 1 次活动开展了 5 天,共筛查了 1 289 213 人(占总人口的 2.9%),其中 179 144 人(13.9%)符合疑似结核病标准,4043 人(2.3%)被诊断为细菌学确诊的结核病;3710 人(91.8%)与护理机构建立了联系。第 2 次活动筛查了 5 134 056 人(占总人口的 11.6%),发现 428 444 人(8.3%)疑似结核病患者和 8121 人(1.9%)细菌学确诊的结核病患者;5942 人(87.1%)与护理机构建立了联系。第 1 次活动的病例报告率从 48.1/100 000 上升至 59.5/100 000,病例报告率比值为 1.24(95%置信区间:1.22-1.26)。第 2 次活动的病例报告率从 45.0/100 000 上升至 71.6/100 000,病例报告率比值为 1.59(95%置信区间:1.56-1.62)。在 176 名确诊的麻风病患者中,有 137 名(77.8%)开始接受治疗。
该社区结核病筛查举措是有效的。然而,需要持续监测和调整,以克服特定环境下的实施挑战。