Suppr超能文献

非骨科转诊患者与骨科转诊患者在接受初次全关节置换术时患者合并症和并发症的观察差异。

Observed Differences in Patient Comorbidities and Complications Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Between Non-orthopaedic and Orthopaedic Referral Patients.

作者信息

Feuchtenberger Bennett W, Marinier Michael C, Geiger Kyle, Van Engen Matthew, Glass Natalie A, Elkins Jacob

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Apr 29;16(4):e59258. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59258. eCollection 2024 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Value-based total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has resulted in decreasing surgeon reimbursement which has created concern that surgeons are being incentivized to avoid medically complex patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if patients who underwent primary total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) had different comorbidities and complication rates based on referral type: 1) non-orthopaedic referral (NOR), 2) outside orthopaedic referral (OOR) or 3) self-referral (SR).

METHODS

At a single tertiary care centre, patients undergoing primary TJA between July 2019 and January 2020 were identified using current procedural codes. Data were abstracted from the Institutional National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) along with electronic medical records which included referral type, primary insurance, demographics, comorbidities, and comorbidity scores, including an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score. Complications and outcomes were tracked for 90 days post-operatively. Referral groups were compared using -square exact tests for categorical variables and t-tests or Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests for continuous variables, as appropriate.

RESULTS

Of the 393 patients included in this study, there were 249 (63%) NOR, 104 (26%) OOR, and 40 (10%) SR. The OOR versus NOR group had a significantly greater proportion of patients with obesity (79 vs 64%, p=0.047) and an ASA score ≥3 (59 vs 43%, p=0.007). There was a significantly greater proportion of patients with wound complications (10 vs 4%, p=0.023) and ≥2 complications (14 vs 3%, p<0.001) in OOR versus NOR, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent primary TJA and were referred by an orthopaedic surgeon tended to have more comorbid conditions and higher rates of severe complications. The observed difference in referrals may be explained by monetary incentivization in the context of current reimbursement trends. Organizations utilizing bundled payment programs to reimburse surgeons should use a risk-stratification model to mitigate incentivizing surgeons to avoid medically complex patients.

摘要

背景

基于价值的全关节置换术(TJA)导致外科医生的报销费用减少,这引发了人们对医生受激励而回避病情复杂患者的担忧。本研究的目的是确定接受初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)和全髋关节置换术(THA)的患者,根据转诊类型(1)非骨科转诊(NOR)、(2)外部骨科转诊(OOR)或(3)自我转诊(SR),其合并症和并发症发生率是否存在差异。

方法

在一家三级医疗中心,使用当前的手术编码识别2019年7月至2020年1月期间接受初次TJA的患者。数据从机构国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)以及电子病历中提取,包括转诊类型、主要保险、人口统计学、合并症和合并症评分,包括美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分。术后90天跟踪并发症和结果。根据情况,使用卡方精确检验比较分类变量的转诊组,使用t检验或Wilcoxon秩和检验比较连续变量的转诊组。

结果

本研究纳入的393例患者中,有249例(63%)为NOR,104例(26%)为OOR,40例(10%)为SR。OOR组与NOR组相比,肥胖患者比例显著更高(79%对64%,p = 0.047),ASA评分≥3的患者比例也显著更高(59%对43%,p = 0.007)。OOR组与NOR组相比,伤口并发症患者比例显著更高(10%对4%,p = 0.023),≥2种并发症的患者比例也显著更高(14%对3%,p < 0.001)。

结论

接受初次TJA且由骨科医生转诊的患者往往合并症更多,严重并发症发生率更高。观察到的转诊差异可能是由当前报销趋势下的金钱激励所解释。利用捆绑支付计划报销外科医生费用的组织应使用风险分层模型,以减轻激励外科医生回避病情复杂患者的情况。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验