• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险强制性捆绑支付改革与阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症受益人的关节置换手术使用的关联。

Association of Medicare Mandatory Bundled Payment Reform With Joint Replacement Surgery Use for Beneficiaries With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester, New York.

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Feb 11;3(2):e215111. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.5111. eCollection 2022 Feb.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.5111
PMID:35977279
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8903111/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) are a particularly vulnerable group in whom arthritis is a frequently occurring comorbidity. Medicare's mandatory bundled payment reform-the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model-was intended to improve quality and reduce spending in beneficiaries undergoing joint replacement surgical procedures for arthritis. In the absence of adjustment for clinical risk, hospitals may avoid performing elective joint replacements for beneficiaries with ADRD.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of the CJR model with utilization of joint replacements for Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study used national Medicare data from 2013 to 2017 and multivariable linear probability models and a triple differences estimation approach. Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of arthritis were identified from 67 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) mandated to participate in CJR and 104 control MSAs. Data were analyzed from July 2020 to July 2021.

EXPOSURES

Implementation of the CJR model in 2016.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcomes were separate binary indicators for whether or not a beneficiary underwent hip or knee replacement. Key independent variables were the MSA group, before-CJR and after-CJR phase, ADRD diagnosis, and their interactions. The linear probability models controlled for beneficiary characteristics, MSA fixed effects, and time trends.

RESULTS

The study included 24 598 729 beneficiary-year observations for 9 624 461 unique beneficiaries, of which 250 168 beneficiaries underwent hip and 474 751 underwent knee replacements. The mean (SD) age of the 2013 cohort was 77.1 (7.9) years, 3 110 922 (66.4%) were women, 3 928 432 (83.8%) were non-Hispanic White, 792 707 (16.9%) were dually eligible for Medicaid, and 885 432 (18.9%) had an ADRD diagnosis. Before CJR implementation, joint replacement rates were lower among beneficiaries with ADRD (hip replacements: 0.38% vs 1.17% for beneficiaries with and without ADRD, respectively;  < .001; knee replacements: 0.70% vs 2.25%;  < .001). After controlling for relevant covariates, CJR was associated with a 0.07-percentage-point decline in hip replacements for beneficiaries with ADRD (95% CI, -0.13 to -0.001;  = .046) and a 0.07-percentage-point decline for beneficiaries without ADRD (95% CI, -0.12 to -0.02;  = .01) residing in CJR MSAs compared with beneficiaries in control MSAs. However, this change in hip replacement rates for beneficiaries with ADRD was not statistically significantly different from the change for beneficiaries without ADRD (percentage point difference: 0.01; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.09;  = .88). No statistically significant changes in knee replacement rates were noted for beneficiaries with ADRD compared with those without ADRD with CJR implementation (percentage point difference: -0.03, 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.02;  = .27).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with arthritis, the CJR model was not associated with a decline in joint replacement utilization among beneficiaries with ADRD compared with beneficiaries without ADRD in the first 2 years of the program, thereby alleviating patient selection concerns.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69c6/8903111/4633333fa3bc/jamahealthforum-e215111-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69c6/8903111/1e6e0085ce1e/jamahealthforum-e215111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69c6/8903111/4633333fa3bc/jamahealthforum-e215111-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69c6/8903111/1e6e0085ce1e/jamahealthforum-e215111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69c6/8903111/4633333fa3bc/jamahealthforum-e215111-g002.jpg
摘要

重要性:患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症(ADRD)的医疗保险受益人是一个特别脆弱的群体,他们经常患有关节炎等共病。医疗保险的强制性捆绑支付改革——全面关节置换护理(CJR)模式——旨在提高接受关节炎关节置换手术的受益人的质量并降低支出。在没有调整临床风险的情况下,医院可能会避免为患有 ADRD 的受益人进行择期关节置换。

目的:评估 CJR 模式与 Medicare 患有 ADRD 的受益人进行关节置换的使用之间的关联。

设计:这项队列研究使用了 2013 年至 2017 年的全国医疗保险数据,并使用多变量线性概率模型和三重差异估计方法。从参与 CJR 的 67 个大都市统计区(MSA)和 104 个对照组中确定了关节炎诊断的 Medicare 受益人。数据从 2020 年 7 月分析到 2021 年 7 月。

暴露因素:2016 年 CJR 的实施。

主要结果和测量:结果是受益人的单独二元指标,用于确定是否进行髋关节或膝关节置换。关键的独立变量是 MSA 组、CJR 前和 CJR 后阶段、ADRD 诊断及其相互作用。线性概率模型控制了受益人的特征、MSA 固定效应和时间趋势。

结果:该研究纳入了 24598729 个受益人生年观察和 9624461 名独特受益人的数据,其中 250168 名受益人的髋关节和 474751 名受益人的膝关节接受了置换。2013 年队列的平均(SD)年龄为 77.1(7.9)岁,3110922(66.4%)为女性,3928432(83.8%)为非西班牙裔白人,792707(16.9%)同时享受医疗补助和医疗保险,885432(18.9%)患有 ADRD 诊断。在 CJR 实施之前,患有 ADRD 的受益人的关节置换率较低(髋关节置换:分别为 0.38%和 1.17%,  < .001;膝关节置换:0.70%和 2.25%,  < .001)。在控制了相关协变量后,与 CJR 控制组相比,CJR 与 ADRD 受益人的髋关节置换减少了 0.07 个百分点(95%CI,-0.13 至 -0.001;  = .046),与没有 ADRD 的受益人减少了 0.07 个百分点(95%CI,-0.12 至 -0.02;  = .01)。然而,患有 ADRD 的受益人的髋关节置换率变化与没有 ADRD 的受益人的变化没有统计学上的显著差异(差异:0.01;95%CI,-0.08 至 0.09;  = .88)。与没有 ADRD 的受益人相比,患有 ADRD 的受益人的膝关节置换率在 CJR 实施后没有统计学上的显著变化(差异:-0.03,95%CI,-0.09 至 0.02;  = .27)。

结论:在这项对 Medicare 关节炎受益人的队列研究中,与没有 ADRD 的受益相比,CJR 模式在计划的前 2 年内并没有导致 ADRD 受益人的关节置换利用率下降,从而减轻了患者选择的担忧。

相似文献

1
Association of Medicare Mandatory Bundled Payment Reform With Joint Replacement Surgery Use for Beneficiaries With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.医疗保险强制性捆绑支付改革与阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症受益人的关节置换手术使用的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Feb 11;3(2):e215111. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.5111. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
Association of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model With Disparities in the Use of Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement.综合关节置换护理模式与全髋关节和全膝关节置换使用差异的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111858. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11858.
3
Association of Medicare Mandatory Bundled Payment Program With the Receipt of Elective Hip and Knee Replacement in White, Black, and Hispanic Beneficiaries.医疗保险强制性捆绑支付计划与白种人、黑种人和西班牙裔受益人接受选择性髋关节和膝关节置换的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211772. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1772.
4
Mandatory Medicare Bundled Payment Program for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement and Discharge to Institutional Postacute Care: Interim Analysis of the First Year of a 5-Year Randomized Trial.强制性医疗保险捆绑支付计划,用于下肢关节置换和转至机构性康复治疗:一项 5 年随机试验的第一年中期分析。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 4;320(9):892-900. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12346.
5
Association of Medicare bundled payment model with joint replacement care for people with dementia.医疗保险捆绑支付模式与痴呆患者关节置换护理的关联。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2571-2581. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17836. Epub 2022 May 30.
6
Association of the Mandatory Medicare Bundled Payment With Joint Replacement Outcomes in Hospitals With Disadvantaged Patients.强制性医疗保险捆绑支付与劣势患者医院关节置换结果的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1914696. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14696.
7
Evaluation of Economic and Clinical Outcomes Under Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Mandatory Bundled Payments for Joint Replacements.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心强制性联合支付对关节置换术的经济和临床结果的评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jul 1;179(7):924-931. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0480.
8
Association of Medicare Mandatory Bundled Payment System for Hip and Knee Joint Replacement With Racial/Ethnic Difference in Joint Replacement Care.医疗保险强制性捆绑支付系统与髋关节和膝关节置换护理的种族/民族差异之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2014475. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14475.
9
Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity Following a Medicare Bundled Payment Program for Joint Replacement.按族裔划分的医疗保险捆绑支付计划治疗关节置换术后的结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2433962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33962.
10
Hospital Responses to Incentives in Episode-Based Payment for Joint Surgery: A Controlled Population-Based Study.基于病例组支付的关节手术激励措施下医院的反应:一项基于人群的对照研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;181(7):932-940. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1897.

引用本文的文献

1
Observed Differences in Patient Comorbidities and Complications Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Between Non-orthopaedic and Orthopaedic Referral Patients.非骨科转诊患者与骨科转诊患者在接受初次全关节置换术时患者合并症和并发症的观察差异。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 29;16(4):e59258. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59258. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
How a Medicare payment model is affecting care for older adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.医疗保险支付模式如何影响对患有阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症的老年人的护理。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2478-2480. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17948. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
3
Association of Medicare bundled payment model with joint replacement care for people with dementia.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model With Disparities in the Use of Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement.综合关节置换护理模式与全髋关节和全膝关节置换使用差异的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111858. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11858.
2
Population estimate of people with clinical Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment in the United States (2020-2060).美国临床阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍患者人数的预估(2020-2060 年)。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Dec;17(12):1966-1975. doi: 10.1002/alz.12362. Epub 2021 May 27.
3
Racial disparity in end-of-life hospitalizations among nursing home residents with dementia.
医疗保险捆绑支付模式与痴呆患者关节置换护理的关联。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2571-2581. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17836. Epub 2022 May 30.
患有痴呆症的养老院居民临终住院方面的种族差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jul;69(7):1877-1886. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17117. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
Association of Medicare Mandatory Bundled Payment Program With the Receipt of Elective Hip and Knee Replacement in White, Black, and Hispanic Beneficiaries.医疗保险强制性捆绑支付计划与白种人、黑种人和西班牙裔受益人接受选择性髋关节和膝关节置换的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211772. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1772.
5
State Variability in the Prevalence and Healthcare Utilization of Assisted Living Residents with Dementia.痴呆症辅助生活居民的患病率和医疗保健利用的州内变异性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1504-1511. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16410. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
6
Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Dementia.全髋关节置换术治疗痴呆症患者。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6):1667-1670.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.070. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
7
Medical Comorbidities of Dementia: Links to Caregivers' Emotional Difficulties and Gains.痴呆的医学共病:与照料者的情绪困难和获益的关联。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Mar;68(3):609-613. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16244. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
8
Validity of Race and Ethnicity Codes in Medicare Administrative Data Compared With Gold-standard Self-reported Race Collected During Routine Home Health Care Visits.医疗保险行政数据中种族和民族代码的有效性与常规家庭保健就诊期间收集的黄金标准自我报告种族进行比较。
Med Care. 2020 Jan;58(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001216.
9
Association of Medicaid Expansion With Health Insurance Coverage Among Persons With a Disability.医疗补助扩张与残疾人士健康保险覆盖之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197136. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7136.
10
Two-Year Evaluation of Mandatory Bundled Payments for Joint Replacement.强制性捆绑支付在关节置换方面的两年评估。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 17;380(3):252-262. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1809010. Epub 2019 Jan 2.