School of Information and Communication Studies, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
PLoS One. 2024 May 30;19(5):e0304647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304647. eCollection 2024.
The push towards research commercialisation at universities has highlighted the importance of intellectual property (IP) policies in fostering innovation and guiding and managing research commercialisation activities. This paper undertakes a content analysis of intellectual property policies of all (37) Australian public universities, focusing on policy objectives, definition of IP, ownership of IP created by different creators, and distribution of net commercialisation revenues. It is found that all universities assert ownership over staff-created IP, particularly when related to employment or utilisation of university resources. For students, policies tend to balance their rights with university interests, with nuanced approaches for different types of student participation, but the focus of most policies was on postgraduate students engaging in research activities. While some policies had clear arrangements for IP created by visitors and affiliates and Indigenous cultural and intellectual property (ICIP), about a quarter of policies did not specify arrangements for these groups. Revenue sharing arrangements vary but generally award something between a third to a half of net revenue to creators, to both acknowledge their contribution and incentivise further innovation. Policies included a broad spectrum of objectives, from protecting and commercialising IP to fostering innovation and societal benefit, reflecting varying strategies across the higher education sector. Policies could benefit from further clarity in certain areas such as the rights of students or other creator groups. Research is needed to assess the effectiveness of these policies and their influence on innovation and commercialisation activities.
推动大学的研究商业化已经凸显了知识产权(IP)政策在促进创新和指导及管理研究商业化活动方面的重要性。本文对所有(37)所澳大利亚公立大学的知识产权政策进行了内容分析,重点关注政策目标、知识产权的定义、不同创作者创造的知识产权的所有权以及净商业化收入的分配。研究发现,所有大学都主张对员工创造的知识产权拥有所有权,特别是与就业或利用大学资源有关的知识产权。对于学生,政策倾向于平衡他们的权利和大学的利益,对不同类型的学生参与有细微的处理方式,但大多数政策的重点是参与研究活动的研究生。虽然有些政策对访客和附属机构以及原住民文化和知识产权(ICIP)创造的知识产权有明确的安排,但约四分之一的政策没有具体规定这些群体的安排。收益分享安排各不相同,但通常将净收益的三分之一到一半授予创作者,以承认他们的贡献并激励进一步创新。政策包括从保护和商业化知识产权到促进创新和社会效益的广泛目标,反映了高等教育部门的不同战略。政策可以在某些方面进一步明确,例如学生或其他创作者群体的权利。需要研究这些政策的有效性及其对创新和商业化活动的影响。