• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Navigating intellectual property (IP): A comparative analysis of Australian universities' IP policies.导航知识产权(IP):澳大利亚大学知识产权政策的比较分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 30;19(5):e0304647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304647. eCollection 2024.
2
Intellectual Property Management Capacity in Tanzania: Perception of Researchers in Academia and Research Institutions of Health and Allied Sciences.坦桑尼亚的知识产权管理能力:健康与联合科学领域学术机构和研究机构中研究人员的看法
East Afr Health Res J. 2022;6(2):180-188. doi: 10.24248/eahrj.v6i2.697. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
3
Review and Assessment of Intellectual Property Policy Implementation in Tanzanian Universities and Research Institutions of Health and Sciences.坦桑尼亚卫生与科学大学及研究机构知识产权政策实施情况的审查与评估
East Afr Health Res J. 2022;6(1):43-51. doi: 10.24248/eahrj.v6i1.678.
4
Transfusion medicine technology transfer: traps to avoid.输血医学技术转让:需避免的陷阱。
Transfus Med Rev. 2002 Jan;16(1):25-33. doi: 10.1053/tmrv.2002.29407.
5
Promoting justice in stem cell intellectual property.促进干细胞知识产权中的公正。
Regen Med. 2011 Nov;6(6 Suppl):79-84. doi: 10.2217/rme.11.68.
6
Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices.英国大学研究中的全球卫生公平性:当前政策与实践概况
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Oct 10;14(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0148-6.
7
Faculty and employee ownership of inventions in Australia.澳大利亚教职员工对发明的所有权。
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Oct;28(10):1019-22. doi: 10.1038/nbt1010-1019.
8
Human-tissue-related inventions: ownership and intellectual property rights in international collaborative research in developing countries.与人体组织相关的发明:发展中国家国际合作研究中的所有权与知识产权
J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):171-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019612.
9
Policies and practices on competing interests of academic staff in Australian universities.澳大利亚大学学术人员利益冲突的政策与实践。
Med J Aust. 2012 Apr 16;196(7):452-6. doi: 10.5694/mja11.11224.
10
Navigating the future(s) of biotech intellectual property.探索生物技术知识产权的未来走向
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Mar;24(3):249-51. doi: 10.1038/nbt0306-249.

导航知识产权(IP):澳大利亚大学知识产权政策的比较分析。

Navigating intellectual property (IP): A comparative analysis of Australian universities' IP policies.

机构信息

School of Information and Communication Studies, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 May 30;19(5):e0304647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304647. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0304647
PMID:38814965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11139293/
Abstract

The push towards research commercialisation at universities has highlighted the importance of intellectual property (IP) policies in fostering innovation and guiding and managing research commercialisation activities. This paper undertakes a content analysis of intellectual property policies of all (37) Australian public universities, focusing on policy objectives, definition of IP, ownership of IP created by different creators, and distribution of net commercialisation revenues. It is found that all universities assert ownership over staff-created IP, particularly when related to employment or utilisation of university resources. For students, policies tend to balance their rights with university interests, with nuanced approaches for different types of student participation, but the focus of most policies was on postgraduate students engaging in research activities. While some policies had clear arrangements for IP created by visitors and affiliates and Indigenous cultural and intellectual property (ICIP), about a quarter of policies did not specify arrangements for these groups. Revenue sharing arrangements vary but generally award something between a third to a half of net revenue to creators, to both acknowledge their contribution and incentivise further innovation. Policies included a broad spectrum of objectives, from protecting and commercialising IP to fostering innovation and societal benefit, reflecting varying strategies across the higher education sector. Policies could benefit from further clarity in certain areas such as the rights of students or other creator groups. Research is needed to assess the effectiveness of these policies and their influence on innovation and commercialisation activities.

摘要

推动大学的研究商业化已经凸显了知识产权(IP)政策在促进创新和指导及管理研究商业化活动方面的重要性。本文对所有(37)所澳大利亚公立大学的知识产权政策进行了内容分析,重点关注政策目标、知识产权的定义、不同创作者创造的知识产权的所有权以及净商业化收入的分配。研究发现,所有大学都主张对员工创造的知识产权拥有所有权,特别是与就业或利用大学资源有关的知识产权。对于学生,政策倾向于平衡他们的权利和大学的利益,对不同类型的学生参与有细微的处理方式,但大多数政策的重点是参与研究活动的研究生。虽然有些政策对访客和附属机构以及原住民文化和知识产权(ICIP)创造的知识产权有明确的安排,但约四分之一的政策没有具体规定这些群体的安排。收益分享安排各不相同,但通常将净收益的三分之一到一半授予创作者,以承认他们的贡献并激励进一步创新。政策包括从保护和商业化知识产权到促进创新和社会效益的广泛目标,反映了高等教育部门的不同战略。政策可以在某些方面进一步明确,例如学生或其他创作者群体的权利。需要研究这些政策的有效性及其对创新和商业化活动的影响。