Suppr超能文献

减药:一项综合评价。

Deprescribing: An umbrella review.

作者信息

Japelj Nuša, Horvat Nejc, Knez Lea, Kos Mitja

机构信息

1University of Ljubljana Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

2University Clinic Golnik 4204 Golnik, Slovenia.

出版信息

Acta Pharm. 2024 May 30;74(2):249-267. doi: 10.2478/acph-2024-0011. Print 2024 Jun 1.

Abstract

This umbrella review examined systematic reviews of deprescribing studies by characteristics of intervention, population, medicine, and setting. Clinical and humanistic outcomes, barriers and facilitators, and tools for deprescribing are presented. The Medline database was used. The search was limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English up to April 2022. Reviews reporting deprescribing were included, while those where depre-scribing was not planned and supervised by a healthcare professional were excluded. A total of 94 systematic reviews (23 meta--analyses) were included. Most explored clinical or humanistic outcomes (70/94, 74 %); less explored attitudes, facilitators, or barriers to deprescribing (17/94, 18 %); few focused on tools (8/94, 8.5 %). Reviews assessing clinical or humanistic outcomes were divided into two groups: reviews with (39/70, 56 %; 16 reviewing specific deprescribing interventions and 23 broad medication optimisation interventions), and reviews with (31/70, 44 %). Deprescribing was feasible and resulted in a reduction of inappropriate medications in reviews with . Complex broad medication optimisation interventions were shown to reduce hospitalisation, falls, and mortality rates. In reviews of a higher frequency of adverse drug withdrawal events underscores the importance of prioritizing patient safety and exercising caution when stopping medicines, particularly in patients with clear and appropriate indications.

摘要

本伞状综述根据干预措施、人群、药物和环境的特征,对减药研究的系统评价进行了审查。介绍了临床和人文结局、障碍和促进因素以及减药工具。使用了Medline数据库。检索限于截至2022年4月以英文发表的系统评价和荟萃分析。纳入了报告减药的综述,而排除了那些减药未由医疗保健专业人员计划和监督的综述。共纳入94项系统评价(23项荟萃分析)。大多数探讨了临床或人文结局(70/94,74%);较少探讨减药的态度、促进因素或障碍(17/94,18%);很少关注工具(8/94,8.5%)。评估临床或人文结局的综述分为两组:有[具体内容缺失]的综述(39/70,56%;16项回顾特定的减药干预措施,23项广泛的药物优化干预措施)和有[具体内容缺失]的综述(31/70,44%)。在有[具体内容缺失]的综述中,减药是可行的,并导致不适当药物的减少。复杂的广泛药物优化干预措施显示可降低住院率、跌倒率和死亡率。在[具体内容缺失]的综述中,较高频率的药物撤药不良事件凸显了在停药时优先考虑患者安全并谨慎行事的重要性,特别是在有明确和适当指征的患者中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验