Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Framingham Heart Study, Boston University, Framingham, MA, United States.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 30;11:e56653. doi: 10.2196/56653.
Studies evaluating the usability of mobile-phone assessments in older adults are limited.
This study aims to identify design-based barriers and facilitators to mobile app survey completion among 2 samples of older adults; those in the Framingham Heart Study and a more diverse sample from a hospital-based setting.
We used mixed methods to identify challenging and beneficial features of the mobile app in participants from the electronic Framingham Heart Study (n=15; mean age of 72 years; 6/15, 40% women; 15/15, 100% non-Hispanic and White) and among participants recruited from a hospital-based setting (n=15; mean age of 71 years; 7/15, 47% women; 3/15, 20% Hispanic; and 8/15, 53% non-White). A variety of app-based measures with different response formats were tested, including self-reported surveys, pictorial assessments (to indicate body pain sites), and cognitive testing tasks (eg, Trail Making Test and Stroop). Participants completed each measure using a think-aloud protocol, while being audio- and video-recorded with a qualitative interview conducted at the end of the session. Recordings were coded for participant usability errors by 2 pairs of coders. Participants completed the Mobile App Rating Scale to assess the app (response range 1=inadequate to 5=excellent).
In electronic Framingham Heart Study participants, the average total Mobile App Rating Scale score was 7.6 (SD 1.1), with no significant differences in the hospital-based sample. In general, participants were pleased with the app and found it easy to use. A large minority had at least 1 navigational issue, most committed only once. Most older adults did not have difficulty completing the self-reported multiple-choice measures unless it included lengthy instructions but participants had usability issues with the Stroop and Trail Making Test.
Our methods and results help guide app development and app-based survey construction for older adults, while also giving consideration to sociodemographic differences.
评估移动电话评估在老年人中的可用性的研究有限。
本研究旨在确定 2 组老年人(弗雷明汉心脏研究中的老年人和来自医院环境的更具多样性的样本)中使用移动应用程序完成调查的基于设计的障碍和促进因素。
我们使用混合方法从电子弗雷明汉心脏研究(n=15;平均年龄 72 岁;6/15,40%女性;15/15,100%非西班牙裔和白人)和从医院环境招募的参与者(n=15;平均年龄 71 岁;7/15,47%女性;3/15,20%西班牙裔;和 8/15,53%非白人)中识别移动应用程序的挑战性和有益特征。测试了各种基于应用程序的措施,具有不同的响应格式,包括自我报告调查、图片评估(表示身体疼痛部位)和认知测试任务(例如,追踪测试和斯特鲁普)。参与者在使用大声思考协议完成每项措施时,同时使用音频和视频进行记录,并在会议结束时进行定性访谈。记录由 2 对编码员对参与者的可用性错误进行编码。参与者完成了移动应用程序评级量表来评估应用程序(响应范围为 1=不足到 5=优秀)。
在电子弗雷明汉心脏研究参与者中,平均移动应用程序评级量表总分为 7.6(SD 1.1),医院样本中没有显着差异。一般来说,参与者对应用程序感到满意,并且发现它易于使用。很大一部分参与者至少有 1 个导航问题,但大多数仅犯过一次。大多数老年人在完成自我报告的多项选择措施时没有遇到困难,除非它包括冗长的说明,但参与者在斯特鲁普和追踪测试中遇到了可用性问题。
我们的方法和结果有助于指导为老年人开发应用程序和基于应用程序的调查构建,同时也考虑到社会人口统计学差异。