• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国人口的数字健康参与度:来自 2018 年健康信息国家趋势调查的洞察。

Digital Health Engagement in the US Population: Insights From the 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey.

机构信息

Chelsea L. Ratcliff is with the Department of Communication Studies, University of Georgia, Athens. Melinda Krakow is with the University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, and during the study was also with the Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. Alexandra Greenberg-Worisek was with Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, during the study. Bradford W. Hesse served as branch chief for the Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, when this work began; he has since retired.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2021 Jul;111(7):1348-1351. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306282. Epub 2021 May 20.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2021.306282
PMID:34014759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8493135/
Abstract

To examine prevalence and predictors of digital health engagement among the US population. We analyzed nationally representative cross-sectional data on 7 digital health engagement behaviors, as well as demographic and socioeconomic predictors, from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5, cycle 2, collected in 2018; n = 2698-3504). We fitted multivariable logistic regression models using weighted survey responses to generate population estimates. Digitally seeking health information (70.14%) was relatively common, whereas using health apps (39.53%) and using a digital device to track health metrics (35.37%) or health goal progress (38.99%) were less common. Digitally communicating with one's health care providers (35.58%) was moderate, whereas sharing health data with providers (17.20%) and sharing health information on social media (14.02%) were uncommon. Being female, younger than 65 years, a college graduate, and a smart device owner positively predicted several digital health engagement behaviors (odds ratio range = 0.09-4.21;  value range < .001-.03). Many public health goals depend on a digitally engaged populace. These data highlight potential barriers to 7 key digital engagement behaviors that could be targeted for intervention.

摘要

目的

调查美国人群中数字健康参与的流行程度和预测因素。

我们分析了来自健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS 5,第 2 轮,于 2018 年收集;n=2698-3504)的 7 种数字健康参与行为以及人口统计学和社会经济预测因素的全国代表性横断面数据。我们使用加权调查回复拟合多变量逻辑回归模型,以生成人口估计值。数字方式寻求健康信息(70.14%)相对常见,而使用健康应用程序(39.53%)和使用数字设备跟踪健康指标(35.37%)或健康目标进展(38.99%)则不太常见。与医疗保健提供者进行数字沟通(35.58%)中等常见,而与提供者共享健康数据(17.20%)和在社交媒体上共享健康信息(14.02%)则不常见。女性、年龄小于 65 岁、大学毕业和拥有智能设备者对几种数字健康参与行为具有积极预测作用(比值比范围为 0.09-4.21;P 值范围<.001-.03)。

许多公共卫生目标都依赖于数字化参与的人群。这些数据突出了 7 种关键数字参与行为可能存在的障碍,可以针对这些行为进行干预。

相似文献

1
Digital Health Engagement in the US Population: Insights From the 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey.美国人口的数字健康参与度:来自 2018 年健康信息国家趋势调查的洞察。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jul;111(7):1348-1351. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306282. Epub 2021 May 20.
2
Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012.电子健康使用的预测因素:基于2012年健康信息国家趋势调查对数字鸿沟的洞察
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 16;16(7):e172. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3117.
3
Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.加拿大数字健康自我追踪运动的传播:一项全国性调查的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 2;20(5):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9388.
4
Willingness to Share Data From Wearable Health and Activity Trackers: Analysis of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey Data.可穿戴健康和活动追踪器数据共享意愿:2019 年健康信息国家趋势调查数据的分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 13;9(12):e29190. doi: 10.2196/29190.
5
Exploring Functions and Predictors of Digital Health Engagement Among German Internet Users: Survey Study.探索德国互联网用户数字健康参与的功能和预测因素:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 28;25:e44024. doi: 10.2196/44024.
6
Seeking Medical Information Using Mobile Apps and the Internet: Are Family Caregivers Different from the General Public?使用移动应用程序和互联网获取医疗信息:家庭护理人员与普通大众有何不同?
J Med Syst. 2017 Mar;41(3):38. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0684-9. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
7
Physical Activity Support Predicts Safety-Net Patients' Digital Health-Care Engagement: Implications for Patient Care Delivery.体力活动支持可预测安全网患者的数字医疗保健参与度:对患者护理提供的影响。
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Mar;34(3):311-315. doi: 10.1177/0890117119894508. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
8
Who Uses Mobile Phone Health Apps and Does Use Matter? A Secondary Data Analytics Approach.谁在使用手机健康应用程序,这重要吗?一种二次数据分析方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 19;19(4):e125. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5604.
9
Prevalence and Predictors of Health-Related Internet and Digital Device Use in a Sample of South Asian Adults in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Results From a 2014 Community-Based Survey.在加拿大阿尔伯塔省埃德蒙顿的一个南亚成年人样本中,与健康相关的互联网和数字设备使用的流行率及其预测因素:2014 年基于社区的调查结果。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 8;7(1):e20671. doi: 10.2196/20671.
10
Comparison of Mobile Health Technology Use for Self-Tracking Between Older Adults and the General Adult Population in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey.加拿大老年人与普通成年人群体使用移动健康技术进行自我追踪的比较:横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e24718. doi: 10.2196/24718.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of non-invasive wearables biomonitoring to detect presmoking, smoking and postsmoking stages: protocol for an observational laboratory study.使用非侵入性可穿戴生物监测来检测吸烟前、吸烟和戒烟后阶段:一项观察性实验室研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 16;15(8):e103292. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103292.
2
Evaluating the Feasibility of Web-Monitoring Methodology for Measuring Exposure to Online Cancer Misinformation.评估网络监测方法用于衡量在线癌症错误信息暴露程度的可行性。
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jul 29;11:e65887. doi: 10.2196/65887.
3
A feature-based qualitative assessment of smoking cessation mobile applications.基于特征的戒烟移动应用程序定性评估
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Nov 21;3(11):e0000658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000658. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Patterns of digital health access and use among US adults: A latent class analysis.美国成年人使用数字健康的模式:一项潜在类别分析。
BMC Digit Health. 2024;2(1). doi: 10.1186/s44247-024-00100-0. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
5
Perceptions of the Use of Mobile Technologies for Smoking Cessation: Focus Group Study With Individuals of Low Socioeconomic Status Who Smoke.使用移动技术戒烟的看法:对社会经济地位较低的吸烟者进行焦点小组研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 11;8:e58221. doi: 10.2196/58221.
6
Experiences of digital physiotherapy during pregnancy and after childbirth: A qualitative study.孕期及产后数字理疗体验:一项定性研究。
Internet Interv. 2024 Aug 22;38:100768. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100768. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Shared Access to Adults' Patient Portals: A Secret Shopper Exercise.共享成人患者门户访问权限:秘密购物者演练。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Aug;15(4):817-823. doi: 10.1055/a-2370-2220. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
8
Cancer misinformation on social media.社交媒体上的癌症错误信息。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Sep-Oct;74(5):453-464. doi: 10.3322/caac.21857. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
9
Smartphone App Designed to Collect Health Information in Older Adults: Usability Study.智能手机应用程序设计用于收集老年人健康信息:可用性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 30;11:e56653. doi: 10.2196/56653.
10
Patient Engagement With and Perspectives on a Mobile Health Home Spirometry Intervention: Mixed Methods Study.患者对移动医疗家庭肺量计干预措施的参与度和看法:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 20;12:e51236. doi: 10.2196/51236.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Tracking and Information Sharing in the Patient-Centered Era: A Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) Study.以患者为中心时代的健康追踪与信息共享:一项健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)研究
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:1041-1050. eCollection 2019.
2
Data Resource Profile: The National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).数据资源简介:美国国立癌症研究所的健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 1;49(1):17-17j. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz083.
3
Implications of social media use on health information technology engagement: Data from HINTS 4 cycle 3.社交媒体使用对健康信息技术参与度的影响:来自健康信息全国趋势调查(HINTS)第4轮第3周期的数据
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Dec;6(4):566-576. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0437-1.
4
Precision Public Health for the Era of Precision Medicine.精准医学时代的精准公共卫生。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Mar;50(3):398-401. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.031. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
5
Is Online Health Activity Alive and Well or Flatlining? Findings From 10 Years of the Health Information National Trends Survey.在线健康活动是蓬勃发展还是停滞不前?来自十年健康信息国家趋势调查的结果。
J Health Commun. 2015;20(7):790-8. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018590. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
6
Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: A review.利用社交媒体数据进行药物警戒:综述
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Apr;54:202-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
7
A new initiative on precision medicine.一项关于精准医学的新倡议。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):793-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1500523. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
8
Health 2050: The Realization of Personalized Medicine through Crowdsourcing, the Quantified Self, and the Participatory Biocitizen.《健康 2050:通过众包、量化自我和参与式生物公民实现个性化医疗》
J Pers Med. 2012 Sep 12;2(3):93-118. doi: 10.3390/jpm2030093.
9
Finding the missing link for big biomedical data.寻找大型生物医学数据的缺失环节。
JAMA. 2014 Jun 25;311(24):2479-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4228.