Gamal Eldin Ahmed, Abdallah Mohammed, Fouad Ahmed, Omar Mohammed
Faculty of Medicine, Urology Department, Menoufia University, Shibin el Kom, Egypt.
Arab J Urol. 2024 Feb 23;22(3):179-185. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2321737. eCollection 2024.
Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) provides durable management for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to large-sized prostate over other surgical modalities. We aimed to assess the early outcomes of Collins knife-assisted bipolar enucleation (BipolEP) versus Thulium-Yag enucleation (ThuLEP) in a group of patients with LUTS secondary to a prostate larger than 80 grams.
We included patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) having a prostate volume > 80 grams, international prostate symptom score (IPSS) >7, urine flow (Q-max) <15, and post-void residual (PVR)>150 ml. We excluded those with a history of previous prostatic surgery, stone, or neurogenic bladder. Bipolar enucleation with early apical release was performed using Collins knife at an 80/100-watt setting (Lamidey Noury), while ThuLEP was conducted using 550- micron fiber and 40/15-watt energy (Lisa Laser). Patients were evaluated before then 2 weeks and 3, 6,12 months postoperatively for changes in IPSS, Q- max, PVR, and the incidence of stress incontinence.
One hundred and twenty patients were equally randomized with a mean prostate size of 104 ± 25 gram. The mean IPSS score was 25 ± 6, Qmax 7.6 ± 1.3 mL/S, and PVR 225 ± 39. There was no significant difference regarding enucleation time, morcellation time, and enucleated tissue volume. Irrigation volume and post-operative hemoglobin drop were significantly lower in the bipolar group ( = 0.008, = 0.0002), respectively. At the third-month follow-up, IPSS, Q-max, and PVR were comparable across both groups, with stress incontinence at 3.3% in the bipolar group versus 1.6% in the thulium group, showing an insignificant difference ( = 0.5)."
Both BipolEP and ThuLEP, with early apical release, provide a safe and effective management of large-size prostate resulting in significant decrease in post-operative stress incontinence incidence during early follow-up. Intraoperative irrigation saline volume, and post-operative hemoglobin drop favored the bipolar group.
对于因前列腺体积较大导致下尿路症状(LUTS)的患者,解剖性内镜下前列腺剜除术(AEEP)相较于其他手术方式能提供更持久的治疗效果。我们旨在评估柯林斯刀辅助双极前列腺剜除术(BipolEP)与铥激光前列腺剜除术(ThuLEP)在一组前列腺重量超过80克且伴有LUTS患者中的早期疗效。
我们纳入了前列腺体积>80克、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)>7、尿流率(Q-max)<15且残余尿量(PVR)>150毫升的良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者。排除既往有前列腺手术史、结石或神经源性膀胱病史的患者。使用柯林斯刀在80/100瓦设置下进行早期尖部松解的双极前列腺剜除术(Lamidey Noury),而ThuLEP则使用550微米光纤和40/15瓦能量进行(Lisa Laser)。在术前、术后2周以及术后3、6、12个月对患者进行评估,观察IPSS、Q-max、PVR的变化以及压力性尿失禁的发生率。
120例患者被平均随机分为两组,平均前列腺大小为104±25克。平均IPSS评分为25±6,Qmax为7.6±1.3毫升/秒,PVR为225±39。在剜除时间、碎块化时间和剜除组织体积方面无显著差异。双极组的冲洗量和术后血红蛋白下降分别显著更低(P = 0.008,P = 0.0002)。在术后第三个月随访时,两组的IPSS、Q-max和PVR相当,双极组压力性尿失禁发生率为3.3%,铥激光组为1.6%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.5)。
早期尖部松解的BipolEP和ThuLEP均能安全有效地治疗大体积前列腺,在早期随访期间显著降低术后压力性尿失禁的发生率。术中冲洗盐水量和术后血红蛋白下降情况双极组更优。