Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain in Dual-chamber versus Ventricular Pacemaker in Complete Heart Block.

CONTEXT

Bradycardia caused by total atrioventricular block (TAVB) is treated by implantation of permanent pacemakers (PPMs) in either dual-chamber (DDD) versus ventricular (VVI) pacing modes. DDD is considered a more physiological pacing mode than VVI as it avoids atrioventricular dyssynchrony. However, previous trials have failed to demonstrate the superiority of DDD in improving quality of life and morbidity.

AIMS

This study aims to provide postpacemaker function of the left ventricle (LV) measured with global longitudinal strain (GLS), in TAVB patients.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This is a comparative study; samples included in the study are adult TAVB patients undergoing PPM implantation, without significant heart function, and structural abnormality. Echocardiographic parameters are obtained before, after 1 month, and after 3 months post-PPM.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 98 TAVB patients undergoes PPM implantation during the study period, 55 patients were excluded, and in the end, only 43 patients fulfill the inclusion criteria.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Baseline data between DDD and VVI are compared using unpaired -test. Statistical significance 1 month post-PPM and 3 months post-PPM is analyzed using paired -test.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between both groups at baseline. However, significant GLS changes are observed 1 month after PPM in the VVI group ( = 0.002), but no significant change was observed in the DDD group even after 3 months ( = 0.055).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we conclude that DDD is superior in maintaining LV function in the short term in TAVB patients after PPM implantation.