Suppr超能文献

胰腺手术后门静脉支架置入术后应用或不应用抗血栓治疗的通畅率和并发症比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of patency rates and complications with or without antithrombotic therapy following portal vein stent placement after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

School of Medicine, Tsinghua University.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2024 Sep 1;110(9):5771-5780. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001755.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Portal vein stent placement is used for portal vein stenosis. However, reports on postpancreatic surgery cases are rare. Whether antithrombotic therapy should be administered remains controversial. In this paper, the authors reviewed current data to evaluate the influence of antithrombosis on stent patency after pancreatic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared studies in which patients did or did not receive antithrombotic therapy after portal vein stent placement. The authors compared patency after stent placement and complication rate.

RESULTS

There were 22 ( n =207) studies in which patients received antithrombotic therapy and 8 ( n =61) in which patients did not receive therapy. Antithrombotic agents, such as aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, and warfarin, were used. The overall patency rates were similar between the groups (79.2% in the antithrombosis group vs. 88.0% in the nonantithrombosis group). Subgroup analyses included those for the etiology of stenosis, types of antithrombotic agents, acute or chronic stenosis, and causes of stent stenosis. None revealed a significant difference between the patency rates in the antithrombosis and nonantithrombosis groups. However, bleeding complications only occurred in patients who received antithrombotic therapy.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant benefit of antithrombotic therapy after portal vein stent placement following pancreatic surgery. Antithrombotic therapy should be performed with caution because it may cause complications, such as bleeding.

摘要

背景

门静脉支架置入术用于治疗门静脉狭窄。然而,有关胰术后病例的报道很少。是否应进行抗血栓治疗仍存在争议。本文作者回顾了现有数据,以评估胰术后抗血栓治疗对支架通畅性的影响。

材料和方法

本系统评价和荟萃分析比较了门静脉支架置入后患者接受或未接受抗血栓治疗的研究。作者比较了支架置入后的通畅率和并发症发生率。

结果

有 22 项(n=207)研究中患者接受了抗血栓治疗,8 项(n=61)研究中患者未接受治疗。使用的抗血栓药物有阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、肝素和华法林等。两组患者的总体通畅率相似(抗血栓组为 79.2%,非抗血栓组为 88.0%)。亚组分析包括狭窄病因、抗血栓药物类型、急性或慢性狭窄以及支架狭窄的原因。均未发现抗血栓治疗组和非抗血栓治疗组之间的通畅率存在显著差异。然而,仅在接受抗血栓治疗的患者中发生了出血并发症。

结论

胰术后门静脉支架置入后抗血栓治疗并无明显获益。由于可能导致出血等并发症,抗血栓治疗应谨慎进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59cc/11392126/be2a6b56ea34/js9-110-5771-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验