• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Anaerobes in diabetic foot infections: pathophysiology, epidemiology, virulence, and management.糖尿病足感染中的厌氧菌:病理生理学、流行病学、毒力和治疗。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Sep 12;37(3):e0014323. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00143-23. Epub 2024 May 31.
2
The role of anaerobes in diabetic foot infections.厌氧菌在糖尿病足感染中的作用。
Anaerobe. 2015 Aug;34:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
3
Prevalence of pathogens in diabetic foot infection in South Indian type 2 diabetic patients.南印度2型糖尿病患者糖尿病足感染的病原体患病率
J Assoc Physicians India. 2002 Aug;50:1013-6.
4
Bacteriology of moderate-to-severe diabetic foot infections and in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents.中重度糖尿病足感染的细菌学及抗菌药物的体外活性
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Sep;45(9):2819-28. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00551-07. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
5
Microbiological profile and antimicrobial resistance among diabetic foot infections in Lebanon.黎巴嫩糖尿病足感染的微生物谱和抗菌药物耐药性。
Int Wound J. 2020 Dec;17(6):1764-1773. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13465. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
The occurrence, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance of anaerobes in polymicrobial infections.多微生物感染中厌氧菌的发生、毒力及抗菌药物耐药性
Am J Surg. 1995 May;169(5A Suppl):2S-7S.
7
Antimicrobial susceptibility of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria in a University Hospital Centre Split, Croatia in 2013.2013年克罗地亚斯普利特大学医院中心临床分离厌氧菌的药敏性
Anaerobe. 2015 Feb;31:31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
8
Polymicrobial nature of chronic diabetic foot ulcer biofilm infections determined using bacterial tag encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP).采用细菌标签编码的FLX扩增子焦磷酸测序技术(bTEFAP)确定慢性糖尿病足溃疡生物膜感染的多微生物性质。
PLoS One. 2008 Oct 3;3(10):e3326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003326.
9
Foot infections in diabetic patients: the role of anaerobes.糖尿病患者的足部感染:厌氧菌的作用。
Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Jun;20 Suppl 2:S283-8. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.supplement_2.s283.
10
Isolation of bacteria from diabetic foot ulcers with special reference to anaerobe isolation by simple two-step combustion technique in candle jar.从糖尿病足溃疡中分离细菌,特别提及通过烛缸中简单的两步燃烧技术分离厌氧菌。
Indian J Med Res. 2017 Jan;145(1):97-101. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1436_14.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovations in hydrogel therapies for diabetic wound healing: bridging the gap between pathophysiology and clinical application.用于糖尿病伤口愈合的水凝胶疗法的创新:弥合病理生理学与临床应用之间的差距。
Burns Trauma. 2025 Apr 9;13:tkaf025. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkaf025. eCollection 2025.
2
New Strategies for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Nanoenzymes: Frontline Advances in Anti-Infection, Immune Regulation, and Microenvironment Improvement.使用纳米酶治疗糖尿病足溃疡的新策略:抗感染、免疫调节和改善微环境的前沿进展
Int J Nanomedicine. 2025 Jul 5;20:8783-8810. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S531396. eCollection 2025.
3
The healing process of diabetic ulcers correlates with changes in the cutaneous microbiota.糖尿病溃疡的愈合过程与皮肤微生物群的变化相关。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 12;14(1):27628. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77987-2.
4
Integrating bioinformatics and multiple machine learning to identify mitophagy-related targets for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: evidence from transcriptome analysis and drug docking.整合生物信息学和多种机器学习方法以鉴定用于糖尿病足溃疡诊断和治疗的线粒体自噬相关靶点:来自转录组分析和药物对接的证据
Front Mol Biosci. 2024 Jul 9;11:1420136. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1420136. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
IWGDF/IDSA Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes-related Foot Infections (IWGDF/IDSA 2023).国际糖尿病足工作组/美国感染病学会糖尿病相关足部感染诊断与治疗指南(国际糖尿病足工作组/美国感染病学会,2023年)
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 2. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad527.
2
Guidelines on the classification of foot ulcers in people with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update).糖尿病患者足部溃疡分类指南(IWGDF 2023 更新)。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar;40(3):e3648. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3648. Epub 2023 May 14.
3
Rapid microbiological diagnosis based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing: A comparison of bacterial composition in diabetic foot infections and contralateral intact skin.基于16S rRNA基因测序的快速微生物学诊断:糖尿病足感染与对侧完整皮肤细菌组成的比较
Front Microbiol. 2022 Oct 6;13:1021955. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1021955. eCollection 2022.
4
Bacterial Interactions in the Context of Chronic Wound Biofilm: A Review.慢性伤口生物膜背景下的细菌相互作用:综述
Microorganisms. 2022 Jul 25;10(8):1500. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10081500.
5
Diabetic foot infections: A microbiologic review.糖尿病足感染:微生物学综述。
Foot (Edinb). 2022 May;51:101877. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101877. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
6
Microbiome Characterization of Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Association With Clinical Outcomes: Traditional Cultures Versus Molecular Sequencing Methods.感染性糖尿病足溃疡的微生物组特征及其与临床结局的关系:传统培养与分子测序方法的比较。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Mar 24;12:836699. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.836699. eCollection 2022.
7
Host-microbe metatranscriptome reveals differences between acute and chronic infections in diabetes-related foot ulcers.宿主-微生物宏转录组揭示了糖尿病相关足部溃疡急性和慢性感染之间的差异。
APMIS. 2022 Dec;130(12):751-762. doi: 10.1111/apm.13200. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
8
Correlation between antibiotic resistance and clinical outcome of anaerobic infections; mini-review.抗生素耐药性与厌氧感染临床结局的相关性;小型综述。
Anaerobe. 2021 Dec;72:102463. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102463. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
9
UK Bacteroides species surveillance survey: Change in antimicrobial resistance over 16 years (2000-2016).英国拟杆菌属种监测调查:16 年来(2000-2016 年)抗菌药物耐药性的变化。
Anaerobe. 2021 Dec;72:102447. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102447. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
10
The microbiology of diabetic foot infections: a meta-analysis.糖尿病足感染的微生物学:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 9;21(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06516-7.

糖尿病足感染中的厌氧菌:病理生理学、流行病学、毒力和治疗。

Anaerobes in diabetic foot infections: pathophysiology, epidemiology, virulence, and management.

机构信息

VBIC, INSERM U1047, Univ Montpellier, Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France.

HydroSciences Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Service de Microbiologie et Hygiène, Hospitalière, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Sep 12;37(3):e0014323. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00143-23. Epub 2024 May 31.

DOI:10.1128/cmr.00143-23
PMID:38819166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11391693/
Abstract

Diabetic foot infections (DFI) are a public health problem worldwide. DFI are polymicrobial, biofilm-associated infections involving complex bacterial communities organized in functional equivalent pathogroups, all including anaerobes. Indeed, multiple pathophysiological factors favor the growth of anaerobes in this context. However, the prevalence, role, and contribution of anaerobes in wound evolution remain poorly characterized due to their challenging detection. Studies based on culture reviewed herein showed a weighted average of 17% of patients with anaerobes. Comparatively, the weighted average of patients with anaerobes identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing was 83.8%. Culture largely underestimated not only the presence but also the diversity of anaerobes compared with cultivation-independent approaches but both methods showed that anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci were the most commonly identified in DFI. Anaerobes were more present in deeper lesions, and their detection was associated with fever, malodorous lesions, and ulcer depth and duration. More specifically, initial abundance of spp. was associated with ulcer-impaired healing, spp. detection was significantly correlated with the duration of DFI, and the presence of spp. was significantly associated with amputation. Antimicrobial resistance of anaerobes in DFI remains slightly studied and warrants more consideration in the context of increasing resistance of the most frequently identified anaerobes in DFI. The high rate of patients with DFI-involving anaerobes, the increased knowledge on the species identified, their virulence factors, and their potential role in wound evolution support recommendations combining debridement and antibiotic therapy effective on anaerobes in moderate and severe DFI.

摘要

糖尿病足感染(DFI)是一个全球性的公共卫生问题。DFI 是多微生物、生物膜相关感染,涉及复杂的细菌群落,这些细菌群落组织成功能等效的病原菌群,其中均包括厌氧菌。事实上,多种病理生理因素有利于厌氧菌在这种情况下生长。然而,由于厌氧菌的检测具有挑战性,因此厌氧菌在伤口演变中的流行率、作用和贡献仍未得到充分描述。本文综述的基于培养的研究显示,有 17%的患者存在厌氧菌。相比之下,通过 16S rRNA 基因测序鉴定的厌氧菌患者的加权平均值为 83.8%。与培养无关的方法相比,培养法不仅大大低估了厌氧菌的存在,而且还低估了其多样性,但这两种方法均表明,厌氧菌中的革兰氏阴性杆菌和革兰氏阳性球菌最常被鉴定为 DFI。厌氧菌在较深的病变中更为常见,其检测与发热、恶臭病变以及溃疡深度和持续时间有关。更具体地说, spp.的初始丰度与溃疡愈合受损有关, spp.的检测与 DFI 的持续时间显著相关, spp.的存在与截肢显著相关。DFI 中厌氧菌的抗菌药物耐药性研究较少,在 DFI 中最常鉴定的厌氧菌的耐药性不断增加的情况下,需要更多地考虑这一问题。有较高比例的 DFI 患者涉及厌氧菌,对鉴定出的物种的了解增加,它们的毒力因子以及它们在伤口演变中的潜在作用,支持在中度和重度 DFI 中结合清创术和对厌氧菌有效的抗生素治疗的建议。