Suppr超能文献

从糖尿病足溃疡中分离细菌,特别提及通过烛缸中简单的两步燃烧技术分离厌氧菌。

Isolation of bacteria from diabetic foot ulcers with special reference to anaerobe isolation by simple two-step combustion technique in candle jar.

作者信息

Haldar Jayeeta, Mukherjee Poulami, Mukhopadhyay Satinath, Maiti Prasanta Kumar

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research, Kolkata, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Res. 2017 Jan;145(1):97-101. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1436_14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Although polymicrobial infections involving both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria are very common in diabetic foot ulcers, in many centres of developing countries, anaerobes are rarely isolated due to technical difficulties. This can be overcome by using a new simple, innovative technique of a combination of candle combustion and use of acidified copper-coated steel wool, as reported here.

METHODS

In-house developed method was used in a prospective clinico-microbiological study for anaerobes from randomly selected 43 patients with diabetic foot ulcers along with conventional method of anaerobic culture in GasPak system and aerobic culture by standard laboratory procedures. For primary isolation of anaerobes, Brucella blood agar supplemented with hemin (5 μg/ml) and menadione (1 μg/ml) was used. Antibiotic sensitivity tests were performed by the standard disc diffusion method for aerobes and E-test method for anaerobes.

RESULTS

All the 43 samples were culture positive, of which aerobic Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) predominated, followed by Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus and diphtheroids. Anaerobes isolated from 21 samples were Peptostreptococcus, Bacteroides, Porphyromonas, Veillonella spp. and Clostridium perfringens by both GasPak and in-house developed and modified candle jar techniques. Imipenem and metronidazole were most sensitive while clindamycin, penicillin and cefoxitin were least sensitive drugs for anaerobes. Aerobic GNB were found to be multidrug resistant, especially to penicillin and cephalosporins. The most sensitive drug was piperacillin-tazobactam.

INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: For isolation of anaerobes from clinical specimens such as diabetic foot ulcers, modified candle jar technique was found to be as reliable as GasPak system. This modified technique needs to be tested for many other clinical materials which are not yet evaluated.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管涉及需氧菌和厌氧菌的混合感染在糖尿病足溃疡中非常常见,但在许多发展中国家的医疗中心,由于技术困难,厌氧菌很少被分离出来。本文报道了一种新的简单创新技术,即蜡烛燃烧与酸化镀铜钢丝棉相结合的方法,可克服这一问题。

方法

在一项前瞻性临床微生物学研究中,对随机选取的43例糖尿病足溃疡患者,采用自行研发的方法分离厌氧菌,同时采用GasPak系统中的传统厌氧培养方法以及标准实验室程序进行需氧培养。用于厌氧菌初次分离的培养基为添加了血红素(5μg/ml)和甲萘醌(1μg/ml)的布鲁氏血琼脂。需氧菌的药敏试验采用标准纸片扩散法,厌氧菌采用E-test法。

结果

43份样本培养均呈阳性,其中需氧革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)占主导,其次是金黄色葡萄球菌、肠球菌和类白喉杆菌。通过GasPak系统以及自行研发并改良的蜡烛罐技术,从21份样本中分离出的厌氧菌有消化链球菌、拟杆菌、卟啉单胞菌、韦荣球菌属和产气荚膜梭菌。亚胺培南和甲硝唑对厌氧菌最敏感,而克林霉素、青霉素和头孢西丁对厌氧菌最不敏感。需氧GNB表现出多重耐药性,尤其是对青霉素和头孢菌素。最敏感的药物是哌拉西林-他唑巴坦。

解读与结论

对于从糖尿病足溃疡等临床标本中分离厌氧菌,改良蜡烛罐技术与GasPak系统一样可靠。这种改良技术需要针对许多尚未评估的其他临床材料进行测试。

相似文献

2
Bacteriology of moderate-to-severe diabetic foot infections and in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents.
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Sep;45(9):2819-28. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00551-07. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
4
A study of the microbiology of diabetic foot infections in a teaching hospital in Kuwait.
J Infect Public Health. 2012 Mar;5(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Bacteriological Profile of Diabetic Foot Ulcer With Special Reference to Biofilm Formation.
Cureus. 2025 Mar 21;17(3):e80974. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80974. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Anaerobes in diabetic foot infections: pathophysiology, epidemiology, virulence, and management.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Sep 12;37(3):e0014323. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00143-23. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
Diabetic Foot Ulcer in India: Aetiological Trends and Bacterial Diversity.
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Mar-Apr;27(2):107-114. doi: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_458_22. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
5
Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Current Advances in Antimicrobial Therapies and Emerging Treatments.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Oct 24;8(4):193. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8040193.

本文引用的文献

2
Isolation, Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Anaerobic Bacteria: A Study Re-emphasizing Its Role.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Nov;8(11):DL01-2. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8846.5167. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
5
Bacteriology of diabetic foot lesions.
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2004 Jul-Sep;22(3):175-8.
6
A clinico-microbiological study of diabetic foot ulcers in an Indian tertiary care hospital.
Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug;29(8):1727-32. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0116.
8
Osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients.
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Dec;25(6):1318-26. doi: 10.1086/516148.
9
Improved isolation of anaerobic bacteria from the mouse cecum by maintaining continuous strict anaerobiosis.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1967 Mar;124(3):903-9. doi: 10.3181/00379727-124-31882.
10
The diabetic foot.
Orthopedics. 1987 Jan;10(1):163-72. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19870101-28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验