Haldar Jayeeta, Mukherjee Poulami, Mukhopadhyay Satinath, Maiti Prasanta Kumar
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research, Kolkata, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2017 Jan;145(1):97-101. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1436_14.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Although polymicrobial infections involving both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria are very common in diabetic foot ulcers, in many centres of developing countries, anaerobes are rarely isolated due to technical difficulties. This can be overcome by using a new simple, innovative technique of a combination of candle combustion and use of acidified copper-coated steel wool, as reported here.
In-house developed method was used in a prospective clinico-microbiological study for anaerobes from randomly selected 43 patients with diabetic foot ulcers along with conventional method of anaerobic culture in GasPak system and aerobic culture by standard laboratory procedures. For primary isolation of anaerobes, Brucella blood agar supplemented with hemin (5 μg/ml) and menadione (1 μg/ml) was used. Antibiotic sensitivity tests were performed by the standard disc diffusion method for aerobes and E-test method for anaerobes.
All the 43 samples were culture positive, of which aerobic Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) predominated, followed by Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus and diphtheroids. Anaerobes isolated from 21 samples were Peptostreptococcus, Bacteroides, Porphyromonas, Veillonella spp. and Clostridium perfringens by both GasPak and in-house developed and modified candle jar techniques. Imipenem and metronidazole were most sensitive while clindamycin, penicillin and cefoxitin were least sensitive drugs for anaerobes. Aerobic GNB were found to be multidrug resistant, especially to penicillin and cephalosporins. The most sensitive drug was piperacillin-tazobactam.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: For isolation of anaerobes from clinical specimens such as diabetic foot ulcers, modified candle jar technique was found to be as reliable as GasPak system. This modified technique needs to be tested for many other clinical materials which are not yet evaluated.
尽管涉及需氧菌和厌氧菌的混合感染在糖尿病足溃疡中非常常见,但在许多发展中国家的医疗中心,由于技术困难,厌氧菌很少被分离出来。本文报道了一种新的简单创新技术,即蜡烛燃烧与酸化镀铜钢丝棉相结合的方法,可克服这一问题。
在一项前瞻性临床微生物学研究中,对随机选取的43例糖尿病足溃疡患者,采用自行研发的方法分离厌氧菌,同时采用GasPak系统中的传统厌氧培养方法以及标准实验室程序进行需氧培养。用于厌氧菌初次分离的培养基为添加了血红素(5μg/ml)和甲萘醌(1μg/ml)的布鲁氏血琼脂。需氧菌的药敏试验采用标准纸片扩散法,厌氧菌采用E-test法。
43份样本培养均呈阳性,其中需氧革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)占主导,其次是金黄色葡萄球菌、肠球菌和类白喉杆菌。通过GasPak系统以及自行研发并改良的蜡烛罐技术,从21份样本中分离出的厌氧菌有消化链球菌、拟杆菌、卟啉单胞菌、韦荣球菌属和产气荚膜梭菌。亚胺培南和甲硝唑对厌氧菌最敏感,而克林霉素、青霉素和头孢西丁对厌氧菌最不敏感。需氧GNB表现出多重耐药性,尤其是对青霉素和头孢菌素。最敏感的药物是哌拉西林-他唑巴坦。
对于从糖尿病足溃疡等临床标本中分离厌氧菌,改良蜡烛罐技术与GasPak系统一样可靠。这种改良技术需要针对许多尚未评估的其他临床材料进行测试。