Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
School of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae151.
This experiment evaluated the effects of multiple bovine-appeasing substance (BAS) administration during a 42-d preconditioning program followed by a feedlot receiving period on productivity, health, and physiological variables of feeder cattle. Ninety calves were weaned, weighed, loaded into a livestock trailer, transported for 70 km, and unloaded at the Bozeman Agricultural Research and Teaching Farm for a 42-d preconditioning program. Upon arrival, calf body weight (BW) was recorded again, and both pre- and post-transport BWs were averaged and used as calf weaning initial BW. Calves were ranked by BW, sex, and age in a completely randomized design and assigned to receive 1) multiple administrations of BAS at weaning (day 0), days 14, 28, and before transport and feedlot entry (day 42; BAS; RSEA Group, Quartier Salignan, France; n = 9 pens/treatment), or 2) placebo (diethylene glycol monoethyl ether; CON; n = 9 pens/treatment). Treatments (5 mL) were applied to the nuchal skin area of each animal during the preconditioning period. Calves within treatment groups were ranked again by initial BW, sex, and age, in a manner that pens have similar initial BW, age, and three steers and two heifers and allocated to 1 of the18 drylot pens. On day 42, calves were combined within the treatment group, loaded into two different single double-deck commercial livestock trailers, and transported for 1,000 km (approximately 16 h). Upon arrival (day 43), calves were unloaded at the same feedyard. Blood samples were collected on days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 43, 46, 50, 57, 64, and 90. Average daily gain, final BW, and feed efficiency did not differ (P > 0.52) between BAS and CON calves in the preconditioning and receiving phases. A treatment × day interaction was detected (P < 0.001) for plasma haptoglobin concentrations, which was greater (P < 0.01) in CON on days 3 and 7 vs. BAS calves. During the preconditioning phase, serum NEFA concentration was reduced (P < 0.01) in BAS on day 3 compared with CON calves. A treatment × day interaction was detected (P = 0.001) for exit velocity, which was greater (P < 0.001) for CON vs. BAS calves on days 3, 7, 14, and 21 during the preconditioning phase and on day 46 of the receiving phase. Therefore, Applications of BAS reduced immunological responses and exit velocity associated with stress caused by management practices, but did not improve performance during the preconditioning and receiving phases.
本实验评估了在 42 天预适应期内多次给予牛安抚物质(BAS),随后在肥育场接受期内,对育肥牛生产性能、健康和生理变量的影响。90 头小牛断奶、称重、装入牲畜拖车,运输 70 公里,然后在博兹曼农业研究和教学农场卸载,进行 42 天预适应期。到达后,再次记录小牛的体重(BW),并将运输前后的 BW 进行平均,作为小牛断奶初始 BW。根据 BW、性别和年龄进行完全随机设计,将小牛分为 1)断奶时(第 0 天)、第 14、28 天和运输前及肥育场入口前(第 42 天;BAS;RSEA Group,Quartier Salignan,法国;n=9 个处理/栏)多次给予 BAS,或 2)安慰剂(二甘醇一乙醚;CON;n=9 个处理/栏)。在预适应期内,将处理(5 毫升)应用于每只动物的颈后皮肤区域。在预适应期内,根据初始 BW、性别和年龄再次对处理组内的小牛进行排名,使每个栏内的初始 BW、年龄和三头公牛和两头母牛相似,并分配到 18 个干栏中的 1 个。第 42 天,将小牛在处理组内合并,装入两个不同的单层双层商业牲畜拖车,运输 1000 公里(约 16 小时)。到达后(第 43 天),小牛在同一饲料场卸载。在第 0、3、7、14、21、28、42、43、46、50、57、64 和 90 天采集血样。在预适应期和接受期,BAS 和 CON 小牛的平均日增重、最终 BW 和饲料效率没有差异(P>0.52)。检测到处理×天的交互作用(P<0.001),即 CON 小牛在第 3 和第 7 天的血浆结合珠蛋白浓度更高(P<0.01)。在预适应期,BAS 小牛的血清 NEFA 浓度在第 3 天(P<0.01)比 CON 小牛降低。处理×天的交互作用(P=0.001)检测到出口速度,预适应期第 3、7、14 和 21 天以及接受期第 46 天 CON 小牛的出口速度大于 BAS 小牛(P<0.001)。因此,BAS 的应用减少了与管理实践引起的应激相关的免疫反应和出口速度,但在预适应期和接受期并没有提高性能。