Altmann Andre, Aksman Leon M, Oxtoby Neil P, Young Alexandra L, Alexander Daniel C, Barkhof Frederik, Shoai Maryam, Hardy John, Schott Jonathan M
UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Brain. 2024 Aug 1;147(8):2680-2690. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae176.
Alzheimer's disease typically progresses in stages, which have been defined by the presence of disease-specific biomarkers: amyloid (A), tau (T) and neurodegeneration (N). This progression of biomarkers has been condensed into the ATN framework, in which each of the biomarkers can be either positive (+) or negative (-). Over the past decades, genome-wide association studies have implicated ∼90 different loci involved with the development of late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Here, we investigate whether genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease contributes equally to the progression in different disease stages or whether it exhibits a stage-dependent effect. Amyloid (A) and tau (T) status was defined using a combination of available PET and CSF biomarkers in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. In 312 participants with biomarker-confirmed A-T- status, we used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the contribution of APOE and polygenic risk scores (beyond APOE) to convert to A+T- status (65 conversions). Furthermore, we repeated the analysis in 290 participants with A+T- status and investigated the genetic contribution to conversion to A+T+ (45 conversions). Both survival analyses were adjusted for age, sex and years of education. For progression from A-T- to A+T-, APOE-e4 burden showed a significant effect [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.70-4.89; P < 0.001], whereas polygenic risk did not (HR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.84-1.42; P = 0.53). Conversely, for the transition from A+T- to A+T+, the contribution of APOE-e4 burden was reduced (HR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.05-2.51; P = 0.031), whereas the polygenic risk showed an increased contribution (HR = 1.73; 95% CI: 1.27-2.36; P < 0.001). The marginal APOE effect was driven by e4 homozygotes (HR = 2.58; 95% CI: 1.05-6.35; P = 0.039) as opposed to e4 heterozygotes (HR = 1.74; 95% CI: 0.87-3.49; P = 0.12). The genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer's disease unfolds in a disease stage-dependent fashion. A better understanding of the interplay between disease stage and genetic risk can lead to a more mechanistic understanding of the transition between ATN stages and a better understanding of the molecular processes leading to Alzheimer's disease, in addition to opening therapeutic windows for targeted interventions.
阿尔茨海默病通常按阶段进展,这些阶段已由疾病特异性生物标志物的存在来定义:淀粉样蛋白(A)、tau蛋白(T)和神经退行性变(N)。生物标志物的这种进展已被浓缩到ATN框架中,其中每个生物标志物可以是阳性(+)或阴性(-)。在过去几十年中,全基因组关联研究已经发现约90个不同的基因座与晚发性阿尔茨海默病的发生有关。在这里,我们研究阿尔茨海默病的遗传风险对不同疾病阶段进展的贡献是否相同,或者它是否表现出阶段依赖性效应。使用阿尔茨海默病神经影像倡议队列中可用的PET和脑脊液生物标志物的组合来定义淀粉样蛋白(A)和tau蛋白(T)状态。在312名生物标志物确认的A-T-状态参与者中,我们使用Cox比例风险模型来估计APOE和多基因风险评分(不包括APOE)对转变为A+T-状态(65次转变)的贡献。此外,我们在290名A+T-状态参与者中重复了分析,并研究了遗传因素对转变为A+T+(45次转变)的贡献。两项生存分析均针对年龄、性别和受教育年限进行了调整。对于从A-T-到A+T-的进展,APOE-e4负荷显示出显著影响[风险比(HR)=2.88;95%置信区间(CI):1.70-4.89;P<0.001],而多基因风险则没有(HR=1.09;95%CI:0.84-1.42;P=0.53)。相反,对于从A+T-到A+T+的转变,APOE-e4负荷的贡献降低(HR=1.62;95%CI:1.05-2.51;P=0.031),而多基因风险的贡献增加(HR=1.73;95%CI:1.27-2.36;P<0.001)。APOE的边际效应由e4纯合子驱动(HR=2.58;95%CI:1.05-6.35;P=0.039),而不是e4杂合子(HR=1.74;95%CI:0.87-3.49;P=0.12)。晚发性阿尔茨海默病的遗传风险以疾病阶段依赖性方式显现。除了为靶向干预打开治疗窗口外,更好地理解疾病阶段与遗传风险之间的相互作用可以导致对ATN阶段之间转变的更具机制性的理解,并更好地理解导致阿尔茨海默病的分子过程。