• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非镜头注视会降低模拟在线工作面试中的评估分数。

Off-camera gaze decreases evaluation scores in a simulated online job interview.

机构信息

Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.

Faculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 May 31;14(1):12056. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60371-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-60371-5
PMID:38821979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11143298/
Abstract

During the pandemic, digital communication became paramount. Due to the discrepancy between the placement of the camera and the screen in typical smartphones, tablets and laptops, mutual eye contact cannot be made in standard video communication. Although the positive effect of eye contact in traditional communication has been well-documented, its role in virtual contexts remains less explored. In this study, we conducted experiments to gauge the impact of gaze direction during a simulated online job interview. Twelve university students were recruited as interviewees. The interview consisted of two recording sessions where they delivered the same prepared speech: in the first session, they faced the camera, and in the second, they directed their gaze towards the screen. Based on the recorded videos, we created three stimuli: one where the interviewee's gaze was directed at the camera (CAM), one where the interviewee's gaze was skewed downward (SKW), and a voice-only stimulus without camera recordings (VO). Thirty-eight full-time workers participated in the study and evaluated the stimuli. The results revealed that the SKW condition garnered significantly less favorable evaluations than the CAM condition and the VO condition. Moreover, a secondary analysis indicated a potential gender bias in evaluations: the female evaluators evaluated the interviewees of SKW condition more harshly than the male evaluators did, and the difference in some evaluation criteria between the CAM and SKW conditions was larger for the female interviewees than for the male interviewees. Our findings emphasize the significance of gaze direction and potential gender biases in online interactions.

摘要

在疫情期间,数字通信变得至关重要。由于典型智能手机、平板电脑和笔记本电脑中摄像头和屏幕的位置差异,标准视频通信中无法进行眼神交流。尽管眼神交流在传统沟通中的积极作用已得到充分证明,但在虚拟环境中其作用仍较少被探索。在这项研究中,我们进行了实验,以衡量在模拟在线工作面试中注视方向的影响。十二名大学生被招募为受访者。面试由两个录制阶段组成,他们在每个阶段都说相同的准备好的演讲:在第一阶段,他们面对摄像头,在第二阶段,他们将目光投向屏幕。根据录制的视频,我们创建了三个刺激物:一个是受访者的目光注视着摄像头(CAM),一个是受访者的目光向下倾斜(SKW),一个是没有摄像头录制的仅声音刺激物(VO)。三十八名全职员工参与了研究并对刺激物进行了评估。结果表明,SKW 条件比 CAM 条件和 VO 条件获得的评价明显差。此外,二次分析表明评估中存在潜在的性别偏见:女性评估者对 SKW 条件下的受访者的评价比男性评估者更严厉,CAM 和 SKW 条件之间一些评估标准的差异对于女性受访者来说比男性受访者更大。我们的研究结果强调了在线交互中注视方向和潜在性别偏见的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/11143298/ca5d81c4ad2c/41598_2024_60371_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/11143298/e60344e4dd96/41598_2024_60371_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/11143298/3d75b29d02d5/41598_2024_60371_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/11143298/ca5d81c4ad2c/41598_2024_60371_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/11143298/e60344e4dd96/41598_2024_60371_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/11143298/3d75b29d02d5/41598_2024_60371_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/11143298/ca5d81c4ad2c/41598_2024_60371_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Off-camera gaze decreases evaluation scores in a simulated online job interview.非镜头注视会降低模拟在线工作面试中的评估分数。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 31;14(1):12056. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60371-5.
2
Effect of gazing at the camera during a video link on recall.视频通话期间注视摄像头对回忆的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2006 Mar;37(2):167-75. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.05.003. Epub 2005 Aug 2.
3
Salient features in gaze-aligned recordings of human visual input during free exploration of natural environments.在自然环境自由探索过程中人类视觉输入的注视对齐记录中的显著特征。
J Vis. 2008 Oct 23;8(14):12.1-17. doi: 10.1167/8.14.12.
4
Gaze aversion to stuttered speech: a pilot study investigating differential visual attention to stuttered and fluent speech.对口吃言语的回避注视:一项对视口吃和流畅言语的差异视觉注意的初步研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010 Mar-Apr;45(2):133-44. doi: 10.3109/13682820902763951.
5
Exploration of factors affecting webcam-based automated gaze coding.基于网络摄像头的自动化眼动追踪编码影响因素的探索。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7374-7390. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02424-1. Epub 2024 May 1.
6
Physician eye contact in telemedicine video consultations: A cross-cultural experiment.远程医疗视频咨询中的医生眼神交流:一项跨文化实验。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Sep;165:104825. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104825. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
7
No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm.自闭症成人在直视与回避目光上没有偏好:一个强化偏好注视范式。
Mol Autism. 2020 Nov 18;11(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00398-3.
8
Recording gaze trajectory of wheelchair users by a spherical camera.使用球形相机记录轮椅使用者的注视轨迹。
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2017 Jul;2017:929-934. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009368.
9
A novel method for measuring gaze orientation in space in unrestrained head conditions.一种在头部无约束条件下测量空间注视方向的新方法。
J Vis. 2013 Jul 31;13(8):28. doi: 10.1167/13.8.28.
10
Gaze aversion in conversational settings: An investigation based on mock job interview.对话场景中的目光回避:基于模拟求职面试的调查
J Eye Mov Res. 2021 May 19;14(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.14.1.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of self-disclosure and communication competence on perceived listener distraction.自我表露和沟通能力对感知到的听众分心的影响。
J Commun Disord. 2023 May-Jun;103:106333. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106333. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
2
Physician eye contact in telemedicine video consultations: A cross-cultural experiment.远程医疗视频咨询中的医生眼神交流:一项跨文化实验。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Sep;165:104825. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104825. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
3
Eye Contact in Video Communication: Experiences of Co-creating Relationships.
视频通信中的眼神交流:共同建立关系的体验。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:852692. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852692. eCollection 2022.
4
Multimodal Assemblies for Prefacing a Dispreferred Response: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis.用于引出不赞同回应的多模态组合:一项跨语言分析。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 27;12:689275. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689275. eCollection 2021.
5
Dynamic emotional messages differentially affect 6-month-old infants' attention to eyes and gaze cues.动态情感信息会对 6 个月大的婴儿的眼神和注视线索的注意力产生不同的影响。
Infant Behav Dev. 2021 Aug;64:101626. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101626. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
6
Eyes on Emotion: Dynamic Gaze Allocation During Emotion Perception From Speech-Like Stimuli.关注情绪:言语样刺激感知过程中的动态注视分配。
Multisens Res. 2020 Jul 7;34(1):17-47. doi: 10.1163/22134808-bja10029.
7
Visual and Affective Multimodal Models of Word Meaning in Language and Mind.语言与思维中的词意视觉与情感多模态模型。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan;45(1):e12922. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12922.
8
Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time.实时解读欺骗行为的非言语线索。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 9;15(3):e0229486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229486. eCollection 2020.
9
Cross-Modal Coordination of Face-Directed Gaze and Emotional Speech Production in School-Aged Children and Adolescents with ASD.自闭症谱系障碍儿童和青少年面部定向注视和情绪言语产生的跨模态协调。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 4;9(1):18301. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54587-z.
10
Eye Contact Is a Two-Way Street: Arousal Is Elicited by the Sending and Receiving of Eye Gaze Information.眼神交流是双向的:发送和接收目光信息会引发唤醒反应。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 4;10:1262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01262. eCollection 2019.