Bellato Alessio, Perrott Nadia J, Marzulli Lucia, Parlatini Valeria, Coghill David, Cortese Samuele
University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Malaysia.
University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;64(3):346-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.05.023. Epub 2024 May 30.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the effect of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication on quality of life (QoL), and to understand whether this effect differs between stimulants and nonstimulants.
From the dataset of a published network meta-analysis (Cortese et al., 2018), updated on 27 February 2023 (https://med-adhd.org/), we identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADHD medications for individuals aged 6 years or more with a diagnosis of ADHD based on the DSM (from third to fifth editions) or the International Classification of Diseases (ICD; ninth or tenth revision), reporting data on QoL (measured with a validated scale). The risk of bias for each RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2. Multilevel meta-analytic models were conducted with R 4.3.1.
We included 17 RCTs (5,388 participants in total; 56% randomized to active medication) in the meta-analyses. We found that amphetamines (Hedge's g = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.08, 0.94), methylphenidate (0.38; 0.23, 0.54), and atomoxetine (0.30; 0.19, 0.40) were significantly more efficacious than placebo in improving QoL in people with ADHD, with moderate effect size. For atomoxetine, these effects were not moderated by the length of intervention, and did not differ between children/adolescents and adults.
In addition to being efficacious in reducing ADHD core symptom severity, both stimulant and nonstimulant medications are efficacious in improving QoL in people with ADHD, albeit with lower effect sizes. Future research should explore whether, and to what degree, combining pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions is likely to further improve QoL in people with ADHD.
From a prior dataset of a network meta-analysis, 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in a meta-analysis to investigate if attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication improves quality of life (QoL) in people with ADHD. The analysis showed that medications such as amphetamines, methylphenidate, and atomoxetine improved QoL compared to placebo, with moderate effect sizes. This study underscores the importance of ADHD medications, both stimulants and nonstimulants, not only in alleviating core ADHD symptoms but also in enhancing overall QoL for individuals with ADHD.
Effects of pharmacological treatment for ADHD on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis; https://osf.io/; qvgps.
我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以量化注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)药物对生活质量(QoL)的影响,并了解兴奋剂和非兴奋剂之间的这种影响是否存在差异。
从2023年2月27日更新的已发表网络荟萃分析(Cortese等人,2018年)数据集(https://med-adhd.org/)中,我们确定了针对6岁及以上、根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第三版至第五版)或《国际疾病分类》(ICD;第九版或第十版)诊断为ADHD的个体的ADHD药物随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验报告了生活质量数据(用经过验证的量表测量)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具2评估每个RCT的偏倚风险。使用R 4.3.1进行多水平荟萃分析模型。
我们在荟萃分析中纳入了17项RCT(共5388名参与者;56%随机分配至活性药物组)。我们发现,苯丙胺(Hedge's g = 0.51,95%CI = 0.08,0.94)、哌甲酯(0.38;0.23,0.54)和托莫西汀(0.30;0.19,0.40)在改善ADHD患者生活质量方面显著优于安慰剂,效应大小为中等。对于托莫西汀,这些效应不受干预时长的影响,儿童/青少年和成人之间也无差异。
除了有效降低ADHD核心症状严重程度外,兴奋剂和非兴奋剂药物在改善ADHD患者生活质量方面均有效,尽管效应大小较低。未来研究应探索联合药物和非药物干预是否以及在何种程度上可能进一步改善ADHD患者的生活质量。
从先前网络荟萃分析的数据集中,17项随机对照试验(RCT)被纳入荟萃分析,以研究注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)药物是否能改善ADHD患者的生活质量(QoL)。分析表明,与安慰剂相比,苯丙胺、哌甲酯和托莫西汀等药物改善了生活质量,效应大小为中等。这项研究强调了ADHD药物(包括兴奋剂和非兴奋剂)的重要性,不仅在于缓解ADHD核心症状,还在于提高ADHD患者的整体生活质量。
ADHD药物治疗对生活质量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析;https://osf.io/;qvgps。