Du Lifeng, Yang Yanmei, Bai Xue, Xu Shuo, Lin Ling, Liu Min
Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; Beijing Key Lab of Energy Economics and Environmental Management, Beijing 100081, China; China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing 100191, China.
China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing 100191, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Aug 25;940:173589. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173589. Epub 2024 May 31.
Green hydrogen generated via water electrolysis using photovoltaics or wind has begun to scale up in the process of achieving the global net-zero goal, but there is a lack of research on its impact on the scarcity of water resources and water saving potential. A water resources impact assessment framework for green hydrogen scale-up development is established, integrating the product water footprint and regional water footprint scarcity impacts and advancing the study of the water resources impacts on green hydrogen from water conservation as well as from a sustainable context. The research framework specifies the cradle-to-gate life cycle water consumption of hydrogen production, establishes the water scarcity footprint based on the available water remaining (AWARE) model, quantifies the water saving intensity and potential of the green hydrogen alternative to traditional hydrogen production, and proposes quantitative indicators of the water saving benefit. Taking the regions of 31 provinces in China as a case study, the wind-to‑hydrogen scenario and the solar-to‑hydrogen scenario will generate approximately 68.86×10 m and 126.10×10 m water scarcity footprints, respectively. Under the coal-to‑hydrogen baseline scenario, approximately 1.68×10 m and - 0.57×10 m of water saving potential will be generated. In addition, the water saving intensity decreases from west to east. According to the adjusted quantitative indicators of water saving benefits, the wind-to‑hydrogen scenario in China can reach 40.22×10 meq and the water saving benefit is more obvious in northern regions such as Hebei, Ningxia and Inner Mongolia. The methodological framework can be applied to other countries or regions to assess the sustainable impacts of green hydrogen production on water resources in a given region.
通过使用光伏或风能进行水电解产生的绿色氢能在实现全球净零目标的过程中已开始扩大规模,但缺乏关于其对水资源稀缺性和节水潜力影响的研究。建立了一个用于绿色氢能扩大发展的水资源影响评估框架,整合了产品水足迹和区域水足迹稀缺性影响,并从节水以及可持续背景方面推进了对绿色氢能水资源影响的研究。该研究框架明确了制氢从摇篮到大门的生命周期用水量,基于可用剩余水量(AWARE)模型建立了水稀缺足迹,量化了绿色氢能替代传统制氢的节水强度和潜力,并提出了节水效益的量化指标。以中国31个省份的地区为例,风电制氢情景和光电制氢情景将分别产生约68.86×10立方米和126.10×10立方米的水稀缺足迹。在煤制氢基线情景下,将产生约1.68×10立方米和 - 0.57×10立方米的节水潜力。此外,节水强度从西向东递减。根据调整后的节水效益量化指标,中国的风电制氢情景可达40.22×10毫克当量,且在河北、宁夏和内蒙古等北方地区节水效益更为明显。该方法框架可应用于其他国家或地区,以评估绿色制氢对特定地区水资源的可持续影响。