Suppr超能文献

三级创伤中心在处理钝性脾损伤方面可取得与一级中心相当的效果。

Level III Trauma Centers Achieve Comparable Outcomes in Blunt Splenic Injury as Level I Centers.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.

School of Medicine, William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2024 Sep;90(9):2194-2199. doi: 10.1177/00031348241241729. Epub 2024 Apr 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Identifying patients who can be safely managed in lower-level trauma centers is critical to avoid overburdening level I centers. This study examines the transfer patterns and outcomes of blunt splenic injury (BSI) patients cared for at 2 regional level III trauma centers as compared to an associated level I center.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all trauma patients with BSI admitted to 2 level III trauma centers (TC3) and a level I center (TC1) between 2012 and 2022. Patients were broken into 3 categories: TC1, TC3, and transfer patients (transferred from TC3 to TC1).

RESULTS

A total of 1480 patients were admitted to TC1, 208 patients to TC3, and 128 were transferred. 22.7% of transfer patients were children. No difference in splenic injury grade was seen between patients managed at TC1 and TC3. Patients presenting to TC1 had more severe concomitant injuries. Patients underwent urgent splenectomy at similar rates at TC1 and TC3 (15.1 vs 18.7%, = .1). Successful nonoperative management was achieved at similar rates (81.3 vs 75.5%, = .1). When controlling for ISS and ED disposition, there was no significant difference in length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, and inpatient mortality between TC1 and TC3.

CONCLUSION

Level III centers effectively managed BSI achieving comparable outcomes to the level 1 center. Transfers commonly occurred in pediatric and multisystem trauma patients, though high-grade splenic injuries were not predictive of transfer. High-grade BSI can be safely managed at level III centers without need for transfer.

摘要

简介

确定可以在较低层级创伤中心安全治疗的患者对于避免使 I 级中心过度负担至关重要。本研究比较了 2 个区域三级创伤中心(TC3)和 1 个相关的一级中心(TC1)对钝性脾损伤(BSI)患者的转院模式和结局。

方法

回顾性队列研究纳入了 2012 年至 2022 年间在 2 个三级创伤中心(TC3)和 1 个一级中心(TC1)接受 BSI 治疗的所有创伤患者。患者分为 3 类:TC1、TC3 和转院患者(从 TC3 转至 TC1)。

结果

共有 1480 名患者收入 TC1,208 名患者收入 TC3,128 名患者转院。转院患者中有 22.7%为儿童。在 TC1 和 TC3 治疗的患者中,脾损伤分级无差异。收入 TC1 的患者同时存在更严重的损伤。在 TC1 和 TC3 进行紧急脾切除术的比例相似(15.1% vs 18.7%, =.1)。非手术治疗的成功率相似(81.3% vs 75.5%, =.1)。在控制 ISS 和 ED 处置后,TC1 和 TC3 之间的住院时间(LOS)、ICU LOS 和住院死亡率无显著差异。

结论

三级中心有效地治疗了 BSI,取得了与一级中心相当的结果。转院常发生在儿科和多系统创伤患者中,但高等级脾损伤并不是转院的预测因素。高等级 BSI 可安全在三级中心治疗,无需转院。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验