• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

康涅狄格州 2013-2020 年极端风险保护令。

Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Connecticut, 2013-2020.

机构信息

Dr. Kapoor is an Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Dr. Baranoski and Dr. Norko are Professors of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Dr. Viereck is a Research Analyst, Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Hartford, CT, and a Lecturer at Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Dr. Lin is an Associate Research Professor, School of Social Work, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT. Dr. Swanson is a Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Dr. Easter is an Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. Dr. Zeoli is an Associate Professor, Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI. Dr. Frattaroli is a Professor at the Center for Gun Violence Solutions, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2024 Jun 4;52(2):165-175. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.240022-24.

DOI:10.29158/JAAPL.240022-24
PMID:38824428
Abstract

Twenty-one states and the District of Columbia have enacted Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) statutes, which allow temporary removal of firearms from individuals who pose an imminent risk of harm to themselves or others. Connecticut was the first state to enact such a law in 1999. The law's implementation and use between 1999 and 2013 were previously described, finding that ERPOs were pursued rarely for the first decade and that most orders were issued in response to concerns about suicide or self-harm rather than about interpersonal violence. The current study analyzes over 1,400 ERPOs in Connecticut between 2013 and 2020 in several domains: respondent demographics, circumstances leading to ERPO filing, type of threat (suicide, violence to others, or both), number and type of firearms removed, prevalence of mental illness and drug and alcohol use, and legal outcomes. Results are similar to the earlier study, indicating that ERPO respondents in Connecticut are primarily White, male, middle-aged residents of small towns and suburbs who pose a risk of harm to themselves (67.9%) more often than to others (42.8%). Significant gender differences between ERPO respondents are discussed, as are state-specific trends over time and differences between Connecticut and other states with published ERPO data.

摘要

21 个州和哥伦比亚特区已经颁布了极端风险保护令(ERPO)法规,这些法规允许暂时从对自己或他人构成迫在眉睫伤害风险的个人手中移除枪支。康涅狄格州是 1999 年第一个颁布此类法律的州。此前曾描述过该法律在 1999 年至 2013 年之间的实施和使用情况,发现 ERPO 在最初的十年中很少被采用,而且大多数命令都是针对自杀或自残问题而不是人际暴力问题发出的。本研究分析了康涅狄格州在 2013 年至 2020 年期间的 1400 多份 ERPO,涉及多个领域:受访者人口统计学特征、引发 ERPO 申请的情况、威胁类型(自杀、对他人的暴力或两者兼而有之)、被移除枪支的数量和类型、精神疾病和药物及酒精使用的流行情况,以及法律结果。结果与早期研究相似,表明康涅狄格州的 ERPO 受访者主要是白人、男性、年龄在中年的小镇和郊区居民,他们更倾向于对自己(67.9%)而不是对他人(42.8%)造成伤害。讨论了 ERPO 受访者之间的显著性别差异,以及随着时间的推移各州的具体趋势以及与其他公布 ERPO 数据的州之间的差异。

相似文献

1
Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Connecticut, 2013-2020.康涅狄格州 2013-2020 年极端风险保护令。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2024 Jun 4;52(2):165-175. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.240022-24.
2
Updated Estimate of the Number of Extreme Risk Protection Orders Needed to Prevent 1 Suicide.预防 1 例自杀所需的极端风险保护令数量的最新估计。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2414864. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14864.
3
Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Washington : A Statewide Descriptive Study.华盛顿州的极端风险保护令:一项全州描述性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;173(5):342-349. doi: 10.7326/M20-0594. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
4
Suicide Prevention Effects of Extreme Risk Protection Order Laws in Four States.四州极端风险保护令法对预防自杀的效果。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2024 Sep 3;52(3):327-337. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.240056-24.
5
Civilian Petitioners and Extreme Risk Protection Orders in the State of Washington.华盛顿州的平民请愿者和极端风险保护令。
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Nov 1;73(11):1263-1269. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100636. Epub 2022 May 25.
6
Extreme risk protection orders in King County, Washington: the epidemiology of dangerous behaviors and an intervention response.华盛顿州金县的极端风险保护令:危险行为的流行病学及干预应对措施
Inj Epidemiol. 2020 Jul 22;7(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40621-020-00270-1.
7
Assessment of Physician Self-reported Knowledge and Use of Maryland's Extreme Risk Protection Order Law.评估医生自我报告的知识和使用马里兰州的极端风险保护令法律的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918037. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18037.
8
Petitions for Extreme Risk Protection Orders and Second Amendment Sanctuary Status in Colorado.科罗拉多州的极端风险保护令和第二修正案庇护州地位请愿书。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e244381. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4381.
9
Assessment of Extreme Risk Protection Order Use in California From 2016 to 2019.评估 2016 年至 2019 年期间加利福尼亚州极端风险保护令的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207735. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7735.
10
Extreme risk protection orders in response to threats of multiple victim/mass shooting in six U.S. states: A descriptive study.针对美国六个州的多受害者/大规模枪击威胁采取的极端风险保护令:一项描述性研究。
Prev Med. 2022 Dec;165(Pt A):107304. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107304. Epub 2022 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Firearm Restraining Order Implementation Case Study in Lake County, Illinois.伊利诺伊州莱克县枪支限制令实施案例研究
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251371370. doi: 10.1177/00469580251371370. Epub 2025 Sep 9.
2
Extreme risk protection order use in six US states: a descriptive study.美国六个州的极端风险保护令使用情况:一项描述性研究。
Inj Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 3;12(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40621-025-00585-x.