• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防 1 例自杀所需的极端风险保护令数量的最新估计。

Updated Estimate of the Number of Extreme Risk Protection Orders Needed to Prevent 1 Suicide.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Health Policy, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2414864. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14864.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14864
PMID:38865130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11170301/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs)-also known as red flag, risk warrant, and gun violence restraining orders-authorize law enforcement, family members, and sometimes others to petition a court to remove firearms from and prevent the acquisition of new firearms by a person judged to pose an immediate danger to themselves or others. Previous estimates suggest that 1 suicide is prevented for every 10 ERPOs issued, a number needed to treat that depends critically on the counterfactual estimate of the proportion of suicidal acts by ERPO respondents that would have involved firearms in the absence of ERPOs.

OBJECTIVE

To empirically inform updated estimates of the number of ERPOs needed to prevent 1 suicide.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used data from California for method-specific suicides by handgun ownership (October 18, 2004, to December 31, 2015). Handgun-owning suicide decedents in California were identified using individual-level registry data about lawful handgun ownership linked to cause-specific mortality for a cohort of more than 25 million adults. The study also used data from Connecticut for method-specific suicides among ERPO respondents who died by suicide, extracted from published data (October 1999 to June 2013). Data analysis was performed in December 2023.

EXPOSURE

Handgun ownership.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were the number and distribution of suicidal acts by handgun owners in California, estimated using method-specific suicide mortality data and published case fatality ratios, and the counterfactual number and distribution of suicidal acts and deaths among ERPO respondents in Connecticut had no ERPOs been issued.

RESULTS

A total of 1216 handgun owners (mean [SD] age, 50 [18] years; 1019 male [83.8%]) died by suicide during the study period. Among male handgun owners in California, 28% of suicidal acts involved firearms, 54% involved drug poisoning, 9% involved cutting or piercing, 3% involved hanging or suffocation, 2% involved poisoning with solids and/or liquids, and the remaining 4% involved other methods. Assuming this distribution approximates the counterfactual distribution among ERPO respondents in Connecticut in the absence of ERPOs, 1 suicide death was prevented for every 22 ERPOs issued.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The estimates produced by this cohort study of California handgun owners suggest that ERPOs can play an important role in averting deaths among high-risk individuals.

摘要

重要性

极端风险保护令(ERPO)-也称为红旗、风险逮捕令和枪支暴力限制令-授权执法人员、家庭成员,有时还授权其他人向法院申请,将枪支从被判定对自己或他人构成直接危险的人手中夺走,并阻止其获得新的枪支。先前的估计表明,每发出 10 份 ERPO 就可以预防 1 起自杀,这一需要治疗的数量取决于对没有 ERPO 的情况下 ERPO 受访者自杀行为中涉及枪支的比例的反事实估计。

目的

根据实证数据,为预防 1 例自杀所需的 ERPO 数量提供最新估计。

设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究使用了来自加利福尼亚州的关于特定用枪自杀方法(2004 年 10 月 18 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日)的数据。通过将关于合法持枪的个人登记数据与 2500 多万成年人的特定死因死亡率相关联,确定了加利福尼亚州用枪自杀的持枪自杀死者。该研究还使用了来自康涅狄格州的关于特定用枪自杀的 ERPO 受访者的数据,这些数据是从已发表的数据中提取的(1999 年 10 月至 2013 年 6 月)。数据分析于 2023 年 12 月进行。

暴露

持枪。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是使用特定方法的自杀死亡率数据和已发表的病死率估计,估计加利福尼亚州持枪者的自杀行为数量和分布,以及康涅狄格州 ERPO 受访者在没有发布 ERPO 的情况下的自杀行为和死亡的反事实数量和分布。

结果

在研究期间,共有 1216 名持枪者(平均[标准差]年龄,50[18]岁;1019 名男性[83.8%])自杀身亡。在加利福尼亚州的男性持枪者中,28%的自杀行为涉及枪支,54%涉及药物中毒,9%涉及切割或刺穿,3%涉及悬挂或窒息,2%涉及固体和/或液体中毒,其余 4%涉及其他方法。假设这种分布近似于康涅狄格州 ERPO 受访者在没有 ERPO 的情况下的反事实分布,那么每发出 22 份 ERPO 就可以预防 1 例自杀死亡。

结论和相关性

这项对加利福尼亚州持枪者的队列研究估计表明,ERPO 可以在避免高危个体死亡方面发挥重要作用。

相似文献

1
Updated Estimate of the Number of Extreme Risk Protection Orders Needed to Prevent 1 Suicide.预防 1 例自杀所需的极端风险保护令数量的最新估计。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2414864. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14864.
2
Handgun Ownership and Suicide in California.加州的手枪拥有与自杀。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 4;382(23):2220-2229. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1916744.
3
Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Washington : A Statewide Descriptive Study.华盛顿州的极端风险保护令:一项全州描述性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;173(5):342-349. doi: 10.7326/M20-0594. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
4
Suicide Prevention Effects of Extreme Risk Protection Order Laws in Four States.四州极端风险保护令法对预防自杀的效果。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2024 Sep 3;52(3):327-337. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.240056-24.
5
Assessment of Extreme Risk Protection Order Use in California From 2016 to 2019.评估 2016 年至 2019 年期间加利福尼亚州极端风险保护令的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207735. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7735.
6
Public Awareness of and Personal Willingness to Use California's Extreme Risk Protection Order Law to Prevent Firearm-Related Harm.公众对加州极端风险保护令法律的认知度和个人使用意愿,以预防与枪支相关的伤害。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 4;2(6):e210975. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0975. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Assessment of Physician Self-reported Knowledge and Use of Maryland's Extreme Risk Protection Order Law.评估医生自我报告的知识和使用马里兰州的极端风险保护令法律的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918037. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18037.
8
Petitions for Extreme Risk Protection Orders and Second Amendment Sanctuary Status in Colorado.科罗拉多州的极端风险保护令和第二修正案庇护州地位请愿书。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e244381. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4381.
9
Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Connecticut, 2013-2020.康涅狄格州 2013-2020 年极端风险保护令。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2024 Jun 4;52(2):165-175. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.240022-24.
10
Extreme risk protection orders, race/ethnicity, and equity: Evidence from California.极端风险保护令、种族/民族与公平:来自加利福尼亚的证据。
Prev Med. 2022 Dec;165(Pt A):107181. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107181. Epub 2022 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Professional Training and Public Education Can Support Extreme Risk Protection Order Utilization: A Qualitative Study of Professionals in Oregon.专业培训与公众教育有助于极端风险保护令的实施:一项对俄勒冈州专业人员的定性研究
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251371379. doi: 10.1177/00469580251371379. Epub 2025 Sep 1.
2
Community and System Advocate Perspectives on Extreme Risk Protection Order Implementation: Qualitative Lessons on Client Context, Professionalization, and Equity.社区和系统倡导者对极端风险保护令实施的看法:关于客户背景、专业化和公平性的定性经验教训
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251370929. doi: 10.1177/00469580251370929. Epub 2025 Aug 31.
3
The Epidemiology of Murder-Suicide in the US, 2016-2022.2016 - 2022年美国谋杀自杀的流行病学情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2523698. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.23698.
4
A multi-state evaluation of extreme risk protection orders: a research protocol.极端风险保护令的多州评估:一项研究方案。
Inj Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 9;11(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40621-024-00535-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Extreme risk protection orders in response to threats of multiple victim/mass shooting in six U.S. states: A descriptive study.针对美国六个州的多受害者/大规模枪击威胁采取的极端风险保护令:一项描述性研究。
Prev Med. 2022 Dec;165(Pt A):107304. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107304. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
2
Extreme risk protection orders, race/ethnicity, and equity: Evidence from California.极端风险保护令、种族/民族与公平:来自加利福尼亚的证据。
Prev Med. 2022 Dec;165(Pt A):107181. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107181. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
3
Gun violence restraining orders in California, 2016-2018: case details and respondent mortality.2016-2018 年加利福尼亚州枪支暴力限制令:案例详情和被告死亡率。
Inj Prev. 2022 Oct;28(5):465-471. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2022-044544. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
4
Suicide Deaths Among Women in California Living With Handgun Owners vs Those Living With Other Adults in Handgun-Free Homes, 2004-2016.2004-2016 年加利福尼亚州有手枪拥有者的女性与家中无其他成年人持有手枪的女性自杀死亡比较。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 1;79(6):582-588. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0793.
5
Firearm Violence Following the Implementation of California's Gun Violence Restraining Order Law.加州枪支暴力限制令法实施后枪支暴力事件分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e224216. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4216.
6
Knowledge of State Gun Laws Among US Adults in Gun-Owning Households.美国枪支拥有家庭中成年人对州枪支法律的了解。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2135141. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35141.
7
Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Washington : A Statewide Descriptive Study.华盛顿州的极端风险保护令:一项全州描述性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;173(5):342-349. doi: 10.7326/M20-0594. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
8
Handgun Ownership and Suicide in California.加州的手枪拥有与自杀。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 4;382(23):2220-2229. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1916744.
9
The impact of gun violence restraining order laws in the U.S. and firearm suicide among older adults: a longitudinal state-level analysis, 2012-2016.美国枪支暴力限制令法律对老年人枪支自杀的影响:2012-2016 年的纵向州级分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 7;20(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08462-6.
10
Suicide Case-Fatality Rates in the United States, 2007 to 2014: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.自杀案例在美国的死亡率,2007 年至 2014 年:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 17;171(12):885-895. doi: 10.7326/M19-1324. Epub 2019 Dec 3.