Wigg Alan J, Narayana Sumudu, Woodman Richard J, Adams Leon A, Wundke Rachel, Chinnaratha Mohamed A, Chen Bin, Jeffrey Gary, Plummer Joan-Lee, Sheehan Vanessa, Tse Edmund, Morgan Joanne, Huynh Dep, Milner Margery, Stewart Jeffrey, Ahlensteil Golo, Baig Asma, Kaambwa Billingsley, Muller Kate, Ramachandran Jeyamani
Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Medicine Unit, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.
College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Hepatology. 2025 Jan 1;81(1):136-151. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000862. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
Improving the care of decompensated cirrhosis is a significant clinical challenge. The primary aim of this trial was to assess the efficacy of a chronic disease management (CDM) model to reduce liver-related emergency admissions (LREA). The secondary aims were to assess model effects on quality-of-care and patient-reported outcomes.
The study design was a 2-year, multicenter, randomized controlled study with 1:1 allocation of a CDM model versus usual care. The study setting involved both tertiary and community care. Participants were randomly allocated following a decompensated cirrhosis admission. The intervention was a multifaceted CDM model coordinated by a liver nurse. A total of 147 participants (intervention=75, control=71) were recruited with a median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 19. For the primary outcome, there was no difference in the overall LREA rate for the intervention group versus the control group (incident rate ratio 0.89; 95% CI: 0.53-1.50, p =0.666) or in actuarial survival (HR=1.14; 95% CI: 0.66-1.96, p =0.646). However, there was a reduced risk of LREA due to encephalopathy in the intervention versus control group (HR=1.87; 95% CI: 1.18-2.96, p =0.007). Significant improvement in quality-of-care measures was seen for the performance of bone density ( p <0.001), vitamin D testing ( p <0.001), and HCC surveillance adherence ( p =0.050). For assessable participants (44/74 intervention, 32/71 controls) significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes at 3 months were seen in self-management ability and quality of life as assessed by visual analog scale ( p =0.044).
This CDM intervention did not reduce overall LREA events and may not be effective in decompensated cirrhosis for this end point.
改善失代偿期肝硬化的护理是一项重大的临床挑战。本试验的主要目的是评估慢性病管理(CDM)模式降低肝脏相关急诊入院(LREA)的疗效。次要目的是评估该模式对护理质量和患者报告结局的影响。
本研究设计为一项为期2年的多中心随机对照研究,将CDM模式与常规护理按1:1分配。研究场景包括三级医疗和社区护理。参与者在失代偿期肝硬化入院后被随机分配。干预措施是由一名肝脏护士协调的多方面CDM模式。共招募了147名参与者(干预组 = 75名,对照组 = 71名),终末期肝病模型评分中位数为19。对于主要结局,干预组与对照组的总体LREA发生率无差异(发生率比0.89;95%置信区间:0.53 - 1.50,p = 0.666),精算生存率也无差异(风险比 = 1.14;95%置信区间:0.66 - 1.96,p = 0.646)。然而,与对照组相比,干预组因肝性脑病导致的LREA风险降低(风险比 = 1.87;95%置信区间:1.18 - 2.96,p = 0.007)。在骨密度检查(p < 0.001)、维生素D检测(p < 0.001)和肝癌监测依从性(p = 0.050)方面,护理质量指标有显著改善。对于可评估的参与者(干预组44/74,对照组32/71),通过视觉模拟量表评估,3个月时患者报告结局在自我管理能力和生活质量方面有显著改善(p = 0.044)。
这种CDM干预并未降低总体LREA事件,对于失代偿期肝硬化的这一终点可能无效。