• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

离子型与非离子型造影剂用于心脏血管造影的比较。一项多中心试验的结果。

Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Results of a multicenter trial.

作者信息

Bettmann M A, Higgins C B

出版信息

Invest Radiol. 1985 Jan-Feb;20(1 Suppl):S70-4. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198501002-00017.

DOI:10.1097/00004424-198501002-00017
PMID:3882619
Abstract

Ionic contrast agents currently used in cardiac angiography are well tolerated but have certain negative effects. In a five-center study of 273 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, safety and efficacy of the new nonionic contrast agent, iohexol, were compared with that of the standard ionic material, sodium methylglucamine diatrizoate. Contrast injections were made into the left ventricle and left and right coronary arteries in all patients. Left ventricular, systemic arterial and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures, and electrocardiogram lead II were recorded for 2 minutes. Following the first right and first left coronary injection, systemic arterial pressure and electrocardiographic recordings were made for 1 minute. After each subsequent coronary injection, recordings were made for 20 seconds. Both agents were found to be safe and both provided good diagnostic information. Iohexol was seen to cause both less marked overall hemodynamic alterations and a lower incidence of significant changes in pressure and heart rate. Iohexol may have an important role in coronary angiography and left ventriculography, particularly in high-risk patients, because of its lesser effect on heart rate and blood pressure.

摘要

目前用于心脏血管造影的离子型造影剂耐受性良好,但有一定的负面影响。在一项针对273例接受心脏导管插入术患者的五中心研究中,将新型非离子型造影剂碘海醇的安全性和有效性与标准离子型材料泛影葡胺钠进行了比较。所有患者均向左心室及左右冠状动脉注射造影剂。记录左心室、体动脉和肺毛细血管楔压以及心电图II导联2分钟。在首次右冠状动脉和首次左冠状动脉注射后,记录体动脉压和心电图1分钟。每次随后的冠状动脉注射后,记录20秒。发现两种造影剂均安全,且均能提供良好的诊断信息。碘海醇引起的总体血液动力学改变不太明显,压力和心率显著变化的发生率也较低。由于碘海醇对心率和血压的影响较小,它在冠状动脉造影和左心室造影中可能具有重要作用,尤其是在高危患者中。

相似文献

1
Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Results of a multicenter trial.离子型与非离子型造影剂用于心脏血管造影的比较。一项多中心试验的结果。
Invest Radiol. 1985 Jan-Feb;20(1 Suppl):S70-4. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198501002-00017.
2
Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects.
Acta Radiol Suppl. 1983;366:111-4.
3
Comparison of iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate in cerebral angiography.碘海醇与泛影葡胺在脑血管造影中的比较。
Acta Radiol Suppl. 1983;366:142-6.
4
Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media versus iohexol.成人外周血管造影。四项北美关于离子型造影剂与碘海醇对比的随机临床试验结果。
Acta Radiol Suppl. 1983;366:166-70.
5
Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents.新型非离子型造影剂(碘海醇)对人体的血流动力学和心电图影响:优于标准离子型造影剂。
Am J Cardiol. 1983 Apr;51(7):1218-22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90372-7.
6
Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media vs. iohexol.成人外周血管造影。四项北美关于离子型造影剂与碘海醇对比的随机临床试验结果。
Invest Radiol. 1985 Jan-Feb;20(1 Suppl):S108-11.
7
Hemodynamic effects of contrast media during coronary angiography: a comparison of three nonionic agents to Hypaque-76.冠状动脉造影术中造影剂的血流动力学效应:三种非离子型造影剂与泛影葡胺-76的比较。
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1988;14(1):53-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810140113.
8
Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent.用于心脏血管造影的造影剂:非离子型造影剂与标准离子型造影剂的效果对比
Radiology. 1984 Dec;153(3):583-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.153.3.6387783.
9
Effects of intravenous administration of a new nonionic dimeric contrast medium on the coronary circulation. Comparison with monomeric ionic and nonionic media.
Invest Radiol. 1985 Oct;20(7):746-50. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198510000-00016.
10
Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography.一种用于心脏血管造影的新型非离子型造影剂的双盲研究。
Radiology. 1988 May;167(2):409-13. doi: 10.1148/radiology.167.2.3282261.

引用本文的文献

1
Iodixanol Has a Favourable Fibrinolytic Profile Compared to Iohexol in Cardiac Patients Undergoing Elective Angiography: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group Study.与碘海醇相比,碘克沙醇在接受择期血管造影的心脏病患者中具有良好的纤溶特性:一项双盲、随机、平行组研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 19;11(1):e0147196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147196. eCollection 2016.
2
Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction.16层螺旋CT与磁共振成像用于评估急性心肌梗死患者左心室功能的比较
Eur Radiol. 2005 Apr;15(4):714-20. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2592-x. Epub 2005 Jan 29.
3
Measurement of cardiac output from a test-bolus injection in multislice computed tomography.
多层计算机断层扫描中通过试验团注注射测量心输出量
Eur Radiol. 2003 Nov;13(11):2498-504. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-2054-x. Epub 2003 Aug 6.
4
Reactions to radiocontrast material. Anaphylactoid events in radiology.对造影剂的反应。放射学中的类过敏事件。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 1999 Winter;17(4):469-96. doi: 10.1007/BF02737651.
5
Clinical and economic factors in the selection of low-osmolality contrast media.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Mar;5(3):188-97. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199405030-00003.
6
Should nonionic radiographic contrast media be given to all patients?是否应该给所有患者使用非离子型放射造影剂?
CMAJ. 1988 Mar 15;138(6):497-500.
7
The new contrast agents: a perspective.新型造影剂:一种观点。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1986;9(4):173-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02577934.
8
Safety of the nonionic contrast medium omnipaque in coronary angiography.非离子型造影剂欧乃派克在冠状动脉造影中的安全性。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1989 Mar-Apr;12(2):98-100. doi: 10.1007/BF02577398.