Pearson Madeline, Nobes Jennifer, Macpherson Iain, Gold Lucy, Miller Michael, Dow Ellie, Dillon John F
School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Department of Blood Sciences, NHS Tayside, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
JHEP Rep. 2024 Mar 11;6(6):101062. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101062. eCollection 2024 Jun.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In community pathways for detection of liver disease the most common reason for referral is fibrosis assessment. We investigated the impact of adding the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score as a second-line test (subsequent to an indeterminate or high Fibrosis-4 index [FIB-4] and/or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score) to guide referral and prognostication in our multi-aetiology pathway.
Patients with ELF results from the intelligent Liver Function Testing (iLFT) pathway were recruited. Case note review was undertaken to compare ELF with endpoints of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and mortality (liver-related and all-cause death).
In total, 1,327 individuals were included with a median follow-up of 859 days and median ELF score of 10.2. Overall sensitivity for cirrhosis at the 9.8 threshold was 94% (100% for metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease, 89% for alcohol-related liver disease). Determination of the ELF score as a second-line test reduced the referral rate by 34%. ELF scores predicted hepatic outcomes; each unit change was associated with increased decompensation (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 2.215, 95% CI: 1.934-2.537) and liver-related mortality (aHR 2.024, 95% CI: 1.674-2.446). ELF outperformed FIB-4 for risk of liver-related mortality, particularly in the short-term (area under the curve [AUC] 94.3% 82.8% at six months). Where FIB-4 was indeterminate, ELF had higher AUC for all outcomes within at least 2 years. ELF ≥13 was associated with particularly high rates of decompensation (26% within 90 days) and all-cause mortality (38% at 1 year).
The addition of ELF reduced the number of individuals referred for fibrosis assessment following iLFT pathway testing and provided useful prognostic information. Individuals with ELF scores ≥13 were considered at high-risk of negative outcomes warranting urgent clinical assessment.
Primary care pathways for suspected liver disease are increasingly common and often lead to increased specialist hepatology referrals for fibrosis assessment. This study, using clinical follow-up for liver-related outcomes, provides further evidence supporting ELF testing to safely reduce referrals in a two-step approach when combined with other simple fibrosis markers. Additionally, ELF scores predict liver-related morbidity and mortality, with ELF scores ≥13 indicating particularly high-risk patients. This study may help inform the implementation of diagnostic pathways for early detection of liver disease and highlights the need for urgent review of individuals with very high ELF scores.
在社区肝病检测途径中,转诊的最常见原因是纤维化评估。我们研究了添加增强肝纤维化(ELF)评分作为二线检测(在Fibrosis-4指数[FIB-4]不确定或较高和/或非酒精性脂肪性肝病纤维化评分之后)对我们多病因途径中指导转诊和预后的影响。
招募了来自智能肝功能检测(iLFT)途径且有ELF结果的患者。进行病例记录回顾,以比较ELF与肝硬化、肝失代偿和死亡率(肝相关和全因死亡)的终点。
总共纳入了1327名个体,中位随访时间为859天,ELF评分中位数为10.2。在9.8的阈值下,对肝硬化的总体敏感性为94%(代谢相关脂肪性肝病为100%,酒精性肝病为89%)。将ELF评分作为二线检测可使转诊率降低34%。ELF评分可预测肝脏结局;每单位变化与失代偿增加(调整后风险比[aHR]2.215,95%置信区间:1.934 - 2.537)和肝相关死亡率增加(aHR 2.024,95%置信区间:1.674 - 2.446)相关。在肝相关死亡率风险方面,ELF优于FIB-4,尤其是在短期内(曲线下面积[AUC]在6个月时为94.3%对82.8%)。当FIB-4不确定时,ELF在至少2年内对所有结局的AUC更高。ELF≥13与特别高的失代偿率(90天内为26%)和全因死亡率(1年内为38%)相关。
添加ELF减少了iLFT途径检测后转诊进行纤维化评估的个体数量,并提供了有用的预后信息。ELF评分≥13的个体被认为有不良结局的高风险,需要紧急临床评估。
疑似肝病的初级保健途径越来越普遍,通常会导致更多专科肝病转诊进行纤维化评估。本研究通过对肝相关结局的临床随访,提供了进一步证据支持ELF检测在与其他简单纤维化标志物联合使用时以两步法安全减少转诊。此外,ELF评分可预测肝相关发病率和死亡率,ELF评分≥13表明患者风险特别高。本研究可能有助于为肝病早期检测诊断途径的实施提供信息,并强调需要对ELF评分非常高的个体进行紧急复查。