Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜胆囊切除术中使用端口的系统评价:突破界限

Systematic Review of Utilized Ports in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Pushing the Boundaries.

作者信息

Alshammary Shadi A, Boumarah Dhuha N

机构信息

Department of Surgery, King Fahd Hospital of the University, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Minim Invasive Surg. 2024 May 23;2024:9961528. doi: 10.1155/2024/9961528. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgical procedures have undergone a paradigm shift in the last 3 decades, with minimally invasive surgery becoming standard of care for a number of surgeries, including the treatment of benign gallbladder diseases. By providing a thorough and impartial summary of the earlier published systematic reviews, the current systematic review is the first to present comparison results. This review illustrates the data of intraoperative and postoperative results of each laparoscopic cholecystectomy technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was meticulously followed to conduct the present systematic review. MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science were searched for eligible publications, and a total of 14 systematic reviews were included. A newly developed extraction table was utilized to obtain the predefined parameters from eligible systematic reviews, including operative time, conversion rate, estimated blood loss, bile leak, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, and cosmetic results. All statistical analyses were conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 26.0. The analysis of dichotomous results was summarized using relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and continuous results were summarized using mean differences and 95% CIs. The proportions were compared using a single proportion -test.

RESULTS

The analysis of our primary and secondary outcomes revealed a statistically significant improvement in aesthetic results after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) in comparison to the multiport approach of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This, however, is accompanied by extended operative timing and subsequently, prolonged exposure to anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

Patients should be carefully selected for SILC to minimize technical difficulties and prevent complications both intraoperatively and shortly after the procedure. This trial is registered with CRD42023392037.

摘要

引言

在过去30年中,外科手术经历了范式转变,微创手术已成为包括良性胆囊疾病治疗在内的多种手术的标准治疗方法。通过对早期发表的系统评价进行全面公正的总结,本系统评价首次呈现了比较结果。本评价阐述了每种腹腔镜胆囊切除术技术的术中和术后结果数据。

材料与方法

本系统评价严格遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。检索了MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Cochrane系统评价数据库和科学网以获取符合条件的出版物,共纳入14项系统评价。使用新开发的提取表从符合条件的系统评价中获取预定义参数,包括手术时间、中转率、估计失血量、胆漏、住院时间、术后疼痛和美容效果。所有统计分析均使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)26.0版进行。二分结果的分析采用相对风险和95%置信区间(95%CI)进行总结,连续结果采用均值差和95%CI进行总结。比例比较采用单比例检验。

结果

对我们的主要和次要结局的分析显示,与多端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比,单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)后的美学效果有统计学显著改善。然而,这伴随着手术时间延长,进而延长了麻醉暴露时间。

结论

对于SILC应谨慎选择患者,以尽量减少技术困难并预防术中及术后不久的并发症。本试验已在CRD42023392037注册。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验