Park Sunggeun Ethan
University of Michigan.
Soc Serv Rev. 2020 Sep;94(3):607-645. doi: 10.1086/710706.
Health, social, and human service providers seek diverse ways to engage service users in the service production process. This approach to engagement with users is known as "coproduction." In addition to conventional user-provider coproduction (i.e., patient-centered care), providers attending to stigmatized and marginalized groups may hire staff who share life experiences with user groups. These providers are known as "user representatives," and their service provision is known as "peer coproduction." Using nationally representative data from substance use disorder treatment clinics in the United States, I investigate how clinics' use of patient-centered care and peer coproduction mechanisms is associated with organizational service availability and utilization patterns. Results demonstrate the potential and limitations of the two coproduction mechanisms in substance use disorder treatment. This study is a critical examination of working conditions and the impact of user-engagement mechanisms and calls for a more empowered work environment in human service organizations.
健康、社会和人类服务提供者寻求多种方式,让服务使用者参与服务生产过程。这种与使用者互动的方式被称为“共同生产”。除了传统的使用者与提供者共同生产(即以患者为中心的护理)之外,关注受污名化和边缘化群体的提供者可能会雇佣与使用者群体有共同生活经历的工作人员。这些提供者被称为“使用者代表”,他们提供的服务被称为“同伴共同生产”。利用来自美国物质使用障碍治疗诊所的全国代表性数据,我研究了诊所对以患者为中心的护理和同伴共同生产机制的使用如何与组织服务的可及性和利用模式相关联。结果表明了这两种共同生产机制在物质使用障碍治疗中的潜力和局限性。本研究对工作条件以及使用者参与机制的影响进行了批判性审视,并呼吁在人类服务组织中营造一个更具赋权性的工作环境。