• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次关节镜下前交叉韧带修复并附加缝线增强术后的翻修手术率及相关危险因素

Rate of Revision Surgery and Associated Risk Factors After Primary Arthroscopic ACL Repair With Additional Suture Augmentation.

作者信息

Schneider Kristian Nikolaus, Theil Christoph, Gosheger Georg, Weller Jan Frederic, Goth Anna, Ahlbaeumer Georg

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Klinik Gut, St. Moritz, Switzerland.

Department of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 May 30;12(5):23259671241244734. doi: 10.1177/23259671241244734. eCollection 2024 May.

DOI:10.1177/23259671241244734
PMID:38827140
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11143819/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested promising patient-reported outcomes after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with additional suture augmentation (SA).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk for revision surgery and identify patient- and injury-related risk factors after ACL repair with SA in a large patient cohort subject to strict patient selection.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Included were 86 patients (61 female; 93% follow-up rate) who underwent arthroscopic ACL repair with SA between January 2017 and March 2019 by a single surgeon and had a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Patients were selected for surgery with regard to time to surgery (preferably on the day of injury), tear pattern (limited to Sherman types 1 and 2), and tissue quality (intact synovial coverage). Postoperatively, the patients who needed revision surgery were identified and compared with patients who did not undergo revision surgery, using the Mann-Whitney test for nonparametric analysis and the Student test for parametric analysis. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to investigate the survival rate of the ACL repair.

RESULTS

A total of 9 patients (10%; median age, 48 years; interquartile range [IQR], 27-50 years) underwent revision surgery at 12 months postoperatively (IQR, 8-25 months). The median follow-up of patients without revision surgery was 35 months (IQR, 33-44 months). The revision-free survival rate was 97% (95% CI, 93%-100%) after 1 year, 93% (95% CI, 88%-98%) after 2 years, and 90% (95% CI, 83%-97%) after 4 years. Patient-related factors-such as sex ( = .98), age at surgery ( = .459), body mass index ( = .352), and preinjury level of sports ( = .53)-had no significant impact on the survival rate of the ACL repair. Injury-related factors-such as concomitant injuries of the medial ( = .860) and lateral menisci ( = .414) and the medial ( = .801) and lateral collateral ligaments ( = .534) or same-day surgery compared with a delay of surgery of up to 18 days ( = .277)-had no significant impact on the survival rate of the ACL repair.

CONCLUSION

The revision rate of primary ACL repair with SA at a 2-year follow-up was 10%. Patient- and injury-related factors were not associated with the survival rate of the ACL repair.

摘要

背景

近期研究表明,在初次前交叉韧带(ACL)修复术中附加缝线增强(SA)后,患者报告的预后前景良好。

目的

在严格进行患者选择的大型患者队列中,评估ACL修复术附加SA后的翻修手术风险,并确定与患者和损伤相关的风险因素。

研究设计

病例对照研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

纳入2017年1月至2019年3月间由同一位外科医生进行关节镜下ACL修复术附加SA的86例患者(61例女性;随访率93%),且至少随访24个月。根据手术时间(最好在受伤当天)、撕裂类型(限于谢尔曼1型和2型)和组织质量(滑膜覆盖完整)选择手术患者。术后,确定需要翻修手术的患者,并与未进行翻修手术的患者进行比较,使用曼-惠特尼检验进行非参数分析,使用学生检验进行参数分析。进行Kaplan-Meier分析以研究ACL修复术的生存率。

结果

共有9例患者(10%;中位年龄48岁;四分位间距[IQR],27 - 50岁)在术后12个月(IQR,8 - 25个月)接受了翻修手术。未进行翻修手术患者的中位随访时间为35个月(IQR,33 - 44个月)。1年后无翻修生存率为97%(95%CI,93% - 100%),2年后为93%(95%CI,88% - 98%),4年后为90%(95%CI,83% - 97%)。与患者相关的因素,如性别(P = 0.98)、手术年龄(P = 0.459)、体重指数(P = 0.352)和伤前运动水平(P = 0.53),对ACL修复术的生存率无显著影响。与损伤相关的因素,如内侧(P = 0.860)和外侧半月板(P = 0.414)以及内侧(P = 0.801)和外侧副韧带(P = 0.534)的合并损伤,或与手术延迟长达18天相比同日手术(P = 0.277),对ACL修复术的生存率无显著影响。

结论

2年随访时,初次ACL修复术附加SA的翻修率为10%。与患者和损伤相关的因素与ACL修复术的生存率无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b93e/11143819/22af4a425f5b/10.1177_23259671241244734-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b93e/11143819/a9e0d72bc58e/10.1177_23259671241244734-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b93e/11143819/f2c0a9687bc2/10.1177_23259671241244734-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b93e/11143819/3034f2b0e433/10.1177_23259671241244734-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b93e/11143819/22af4a425f5b/10.1177_23259671241244734-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b93e/11143819/a9e0d72bc58e/10.1177_23259671241244734-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b93e/11143819/f2c0a9687bc2/10.1177_23259671241244734-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b93e/11143819/3034f2b0e433/10.1177_23259671241244734-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b93e/11143819/22af4a425f5b/10.1177_23259671241244734-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Rate of Revision Surgery and Associated Risk Factors After Primary Arthroscopic ACL Repair With Additional Suture Augmentation.初次关节镜下前交叉韧带修复并附加缝线增强术后的翻修手术率及相关危险因素
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 May 30;12(5):23259671241244734. doi: 10.1177/23259671241244734. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Promising functional outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture augmentation.前交叉韧带修复术后采用缝线增强技术可获得良好的功能结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul;31(7):2836-2843. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07236-4. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
3
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes in Younger Patients: Medial Meniscal Pathology and High Rates of Return to Sport Are Associated With Third ACL Injuries.年轻患者前交叉韧带重建的结果:内侧半月板病变和高重返运动率与第三次 ACL 损伤相关。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Apr;46(5):1137-1142. doi: 10.1177/0363546517751141. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
4
Failure Rates After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation in an Active-Duty Military Population.现役军人中使用缝线带增强技术进行前交叉韧带修复后的失败率
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Feb 16;11(2):23259671221142315. doi: 10.1177/23259671221142315. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Comparable Instrumented Knee Joint Laxity and Patient-Reported Outcomes After ACL Repair With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization or ACL Reconstruction: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.动态内置式韧带稳定或 ACL 重建后 ACL 修复的膝关节关节松弛度和患者报告的结果相当:一项随机对照试验的 5 年结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Oct;50(12):3256-3264. doi: 10.1177/03635465221117777. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
6
Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Re-Repair Using Internal Brace Augmentation - A Case Report.关节镜下使用内支撑增强技术进行前交叉韧带再次修复——病例报告
J Orthop Case Rep. 2019;10(1):11-15. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2019.v10.i01.616.
7
Predictors of Revision Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后翻修手术的预测因素。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3140-3145. doi: 10.1177/0363546516660062. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
8
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair with Suture Augmentation for Proximal Avulsion Injuries.缝线增强修复前交叉韧带近端撕脱伤
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Aug 20;2(5):e475-e480. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.05.003. eCollection 2020 Oct.
9
Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort.在多中心前交叉韧带翻修研究(MARS)队列中,移植物选择对前交叉韧带翻修重建结果的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2301-10. doi: 10.1177/0363546514549005.
10
Incidence and Risk Factors of Subsequent Meniscal Surgery After Successful Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.成功前交叉韧带重建后半月板手术的发生率及相关因素:一项至少 2 年随访的回顾性研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;48(14):3525-3533. doi: 10.1177/0363546520967670. Epub 2020 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Higher Unilateral Muscle Imbalance at the Contralateral Knee 6 Months after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后6个月对侧膝关节出现更高的单侧肌肉失衡。
Sports (Basel). 2024 Sep 4;12(9):243. doi: 10.3390/sports12090243.

本文引用的文献

1
Suture-Augmented Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair for Proximal Avulsion or High-Grade Partial Tears Shows Similar Side-to-Side Difference and No Clinical Differences at Two Years Versus Conventional Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction for Mid-Substance Tears or Poor Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tissue Quality.缝线增强前交叉韧带修复术治疗近端撕脱或高级部分撕裂与传统前交叉韧带重建术治疗中节段撕裂或前交叉韧带组织质量差相比,在两年时的侧-侧差异和临床结果无差异。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Mar;40(3):857-867. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
2
Augmenting ACL Repair With Suture Tape Improves Knee Laxity: A Biomechanical Study.使用缝线带增强前交叉韧带修复可改善膝关节松弛度:一项生物力学研究。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Apr 27;11(4):23259671221146013. doi: 10.1177/23259671221146013. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
The modern-day ACL surgeon's armamentarium should include multiple surgical approaches including primary repair, augmentation, and reconstruction: A letter to the Editor.现代-dayACL外科医生的手术器械应包括多种手术方法,包括初次修复、增强和重建:致编辑的一封信。 需注意,这里“modern-day”表述有误,正确的应该是“modern-day”(现代的),整体译文调整为:现代ACL外科医生的手术器械应包括多种手术方法,包括初次修复、增强和重建:致编辑的一封信。
J ISAKOS. 2023 Aug;8(4):279-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.03.434. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
4
Failure Rates After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation in an Active-Duty Military Population.现役军人中使用缝线带增强技术进行前交叉韧带修复后的失败率
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Feb 16;11(2):23259671221142315. doi: 10.1177/23259671221142315. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Promising functional outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture augmentation.前交叉韧带修复术后采用缝线增强技术可获得良好的功能结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul;31(7):2836-2843. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07236-4. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
6
Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Repair or Reconstruction? Five-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.急性前交叉韧带断裂:修复还是重建?一项随机对照临床试验的 5 年结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jun;50(7):1779-1787. doi: 10.1177/03635465221090527. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
7
Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair with and without suture augmentation: technical note.关节镜下前交叉韧带修复术伴或不伴缝线增强:技术说明。
J ISAKOS. 2021 Jul;6(4):251-256. doi: 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000508. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
8
Repair versus reconstruction for proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears: a study protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.前交叉韧带近端撕裂的修复与重建:一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 30;22(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04280-y.
9
Distal remnant length can be measured reliably and predicts primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears.可以可靠地测量远端残端长度,并预测前交叉韧带近端撕裂的初次修复。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Sep;29(9):2967-2975. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06312-x. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
10
Paediatric proximal ACL tears managed with direct ACL repair is safe, effective and has excellent short-term outcomes.儿童近端 ACL 撕裂采用直接 ACL 修复是安全、有效且具有优异的短期结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Aug;28(8):2551-2556. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05872-2. Epub 2020 Feb 10.