Wandell Catie J, Torres Karen
Veterans Afffairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Neurology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Jun 3:1-12. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2359446.
Cognitive and affective factors have been implicated in verbal fluency (VF) performance in Parkinson's disease (PD). This exploratory study aimed to investigate the relationships between cognitive and affective variables on traditional ("core") and "process" (error and interval) scores of VF and elucidate unique information these scores may provide regarding mechanisms underlying VF.
Sixty-two PD patients without dementia completed clinical neuropsychological examinations consisting of attention, processing speed, language, executive functioning, visuospatial, memory, and mood measures. Hierarchical regression and negative binomial regression analyses were used to evaluate relationships between outcome and predictor variables.
Generativity results revealed that processing speed and working memory explained up to 34% of the variance of total letter fluency responses ( = <.001) and processing speed explained 24% of the variance for total semantic fluency ( = .003). For category switching generativity, only age predicted 20% of the variance ( = .01). Two executive functioning measures were negatively associated with error production over the duration ( = -.055, = .028; = -.062, = .004) and final 45-second interval ( = -.072, = .003; = -.044, = .033) of the category switching task. In the initial 15-second task interval, a positive predictive relationship between error production and indifference apathy ( = .616, = .044) was demonstrated.
Findings demonstrate the potential utility of "process" scores in detecting subtle cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease patients without dementia and tentatively evidence the role of indifference apathy in task initiation.
认知和情感因素与帕金森病(PD)的言语流畅性(VF)表现有关。本探索性研究旨在调查认知和情感变量与VF的传统(“核心”)和“过程”(错误和间隔)得分之间的关系,并阐明这些得分可能提供的关于VF潜在机制的独特信息。
62名无痴呆的PD患者完成了临床神经心理学检查,包括注意力、处理速度、语言、执行功能、视觉空间、记忆和情绪测量。采用分层回归和负二项回归分析来评估结果变量与预测变量之间的关系。
生成性结果显示,处理速度和工作记忆解释了总字母流畅性反应方差的34%(P <.001),处理速度解释了总语义流畅性方差的24%(P =.003)。对于类别转换生成性,只有年龄预测了20%的方差(P =.01)。两项执行功能测量与类别转换任务持续时间(β = −.055,P =.028;β = −.062,P =.004)和最后45秒间隔(β = −.072,P =.003;β = −.044,P =.033)内的错误产生呈负相关。在最初的15秒任务间隔中,错误产生与冷漠无情感之间存在正预测关系(β =.616,P =.044)。
研究结果表明“过程”得分在检测无痴呆帕金森病患者的细微认知障碍方面具有潜在效用,并初步证明了冷漠无情感在任务启动中的作用。