Belser U C, MacEntee M I, Richter W A
J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Jan;53(1):24-9. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90058-7.
This study examined the comparative fit in vivo of three types of PFM crown margins. Marginal openings were measured with an SEM on replicas derived from elastomeric impressions. There was no significant difference among beveled metal margins, metal butt margins, or porcelain butt margins either before or after cementation at the 95% confidence level. This study has shown that it is possible under clinical conditions to consistently produce porcelain butt margins with less than 50 micron marginal opening in PFM restorations.
本研究检测了三种类型的金属烤瓷冠边缘在体内的适合性。在由弹性印模制取的复制件上,用扫描电子显微镜测量边缘间隙。在95%置信水平下,无论在粘结前还是粘结后,斜面金属边缘、金属对接边缘或瓷对接边缘之间均无显著差异。本研究表明,在临床条件下,有可能在金属烤瓷修复体中始终制作出边缘间隙小于50微米的瓷对接边缘。