Hung S H, Hung K S, Eick J D, Chappell R P
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry.
J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Jan;63(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90260-j.
The marginal fit of Dicor, Cerestore, and porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns was evaluated. Ten premolars free of caries were prepared for each type of restoration and crowns were made. The vertical marginal openings were measured before cementation, after cementation, and after thermocycling. There were statistically significant differences between all three test conditions in each type of crown, between Dicor and porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns after cementation and after thermocycling, and between Cerestore and porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns after thermocycling. All 30 cemented crowns were then embedded in acrylic resin for serial sections for measurement of absolute marginal openings. Statistically significant differences between Dicor and Cerestore crowns and between Cerestore and porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns were found. It was concluded that marginal openings increased after cementation and after thermocycling, and porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns had significantly better marginal fit than that of Dicor and Cerestore crowns.
对Dicor全瓷冠、Cerestore全瓷冠和烤瓷熔附金属冠的边缘适合性进行了评估。为每种修复类型准备了10颗无龋的前磨牙,并制作了牙冠。在粘固前、粘固后和热循环后测量垂直边缘间隙。每种类型的牙冠在所有三种测试条件之间、粘固后和热循环后Dicor全瓷冠与烤瓷熔附金属冠之间以及热循环后Cerestore全瓷冠与烤瓷熔附金属冠之间均存在统计学显著差异。然后将所有30颗粘固后的牙冠嵌入丙烯酸树脂中制作连续切片,以测量绝对边缘间隙。发现Dicor全瓷冠与Cerestore全瓷冠之间以及Cerestore全瓷冠与烤瓷熔附金属冠之间存在统计学显著差异。得出的结论是,粘固后和热循环后边缘间隙增加,烤瓷熔附金属冠的边缘适合性明显优于Dicor全瓷冠和Cerestore全瓷冠。