• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄勒冈州通过问责制指标展示现代公共卫生系统价值的方法。

Oregon's Approach To Demonstrating The Value Of A Modern Public Health System Through Accountability Metrics.

机构信息

Kusuma Madamala, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon.

Sara Beaudrault (

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jun;43(6):864-872. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00012.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00012
PMID:38830165
Abstract

Oregon's public health system uses accountability metrics to improve health, eliminate inequities, and practice stewardship. First enacted into law during the 2015 legislative session, with additions and clarifications made in the 2017 session, these metrics promote collective action across sectors, bring attention to the root causes of health inequities, and hold public health authorities accountable for performance improvement as they carry out core public health functions. This article describes the development of Oregon's accountability metrics and implications for future practice. In 2023, Oregon's public health leaders adopted a new set of health outcome indicators and process measures for communicable disease control and environmental health, with performance tied to financial incentives. Oregon's process is a model for other states developing an accountability framework in their pursuit of public health transformation. Oregon's work contributes to legislative and other policy decisions for measuring the success of approaches to eliminating health inequities and for applying performance-based incentives within the public health system.

摘要

俄勒冈州的公共卫生系统使用问责制指标来改善健康状况、消除不平等现象并实施管理。这些指标于 2015 年立法会议首次立法,2017 年会议进行了补充和澄清,它们促进了跨部门的集体行动,关注健康不平等的根本原因,并在公共卫生当局履行核心公共卫生职能时,对其绩效改进进行问责。本文介绍了俄勒冈州问责制指标的制定过程及其对未来实践的影响。2023 年,俄勒冈州的公共卫生领导人采用了一套新的传染病控制和环境卫生健康结果指标和过程措施,其绩效与财务激励挂钩。俄勒冈州的做法为其他州在追求公共卫生转型过程中制定问责框架提供了一个范例。俄勒冈州的工作为衡量消除健康不平等现象的方法的成功以及在公共卫生系统内应用基于绩效的激励措施提供了立法和其他政策决策依据。

相似文献

1
Oregon's Approach To Demonstrating The Value Of A Modern Public Health System Through Accountability Metrics.俄勒冈州通过问责制指标展示现代公共卫生系统价值的方法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jun;43(6):864-872. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00012.
2
Early Performance in Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations: A Comparison of Oregon and Colorado.医疗补助责任医疗组织的早期表现:俄勒冈州与科罗拉多州的比较
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Apr 1;177(4):538-545. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9098.
3
Forest and farmland conservation effects of Oregon's (USA) land-use planning program.美国俄勒冈州土地利用规划项目对森林和农田的保护效果。
Environ Manage. 2005 Apr;35(4):368-80. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0054-5.
4
Building the foundation for health system transformation: Oregon's Patient-Centered Primary Care Home program.构建卫生系统转型的基础:俄勒冈州以患者为中心的初级保健之家项目。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 Jan-Feb;21(1):34-41. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000083.
5
Setting health care priorities: Oregon's next steps.设定医疗保健优先事项:俄勒冈州的后续步骤。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 May-Jun;21(3):S1-10.
6
Oregon's Medicaid ranking and cost-effectiveness: is there any relationship?俄勒冈州医疗补助计划的排名与成本效益:二者有关联吗?
Med Decis Making. 1996 Apr-Jun;16(2):99-107. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600201.
7
Community responsibility and the development of Oregon's health care priorities.社区责任与俄勒冈州医疗保健优先事项的发展。
Bus Prof Ethics J. 1990 Fall-Winter;9(3 and 4):183-200. doi: 10.5840/bpej199093/433.
8
Oregon's Psychiatric Security Review Board: a comprehension system for managing insanity acquittees.俄勒冈州精神病安全审查委员会:一个用于管理因精神错乱而被宣告无罪者的监管系统
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1986 Mar(484):86-99.
9
Physicians' early perspectives on Oregon's Coordinated Care Organizations.医生对俄勒冈州协同护理组织的早期看法。
Healthc (Amst). 2016 Jun;4(2):92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
10
Conversations at the end of life:the challenge to support patients who consider death with dignity in Oregon.临终对话:在俄勒冈州支持那些考虑尊严死的患者所面临的挑战。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2006;2(2):25-43. doi: 10.1300/J457v02n02_03.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of data-driven decision-making among agencies serving individuals with criminal-legal system involvement: a qualitative study.在为涉及刑事法律系统的个人提供服务的机构中运用数据驱动的决策制定:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 28;25(1):1138. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13385-2.