From the Department of Medicine (C.L.H., M.R.M., T.R.M., T.P., J.D.-A., T.A., S.H.), University of Otago, Christchurch; New Zealand Brain Research Institute (C.L.H., K.-L.H., M.R.M., L.L., T.R.M., D.M., T.P., J.D.-A., T.A.), Christchurch; Department of Neurology (C.L.H., T.A.), Christchurch Hospital; and Department of Psychology (C.L.H., J.D.-A.), Speech and Hearing, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Neurology. 2024 Jun 25;102(12):e209301. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209301. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
A robust understanding of the natural history of apathy in Parkinson disease (PD) is foundational for developing effective clinical management tools. However, large longitudinal studies are lacking while the literature is inconsistent about even cross-sectional associations. We aimed to determine the longitudinal predictors of apathy development in a large cohort of people with PD and its cross-sectional associations and trajectories over time, using sophisticated Bayesian modeling techniques.
People with PD followed up in the longitudinal New Zealand Parkinson's progression project were included. Apathy was defined using the neuropsychiatric inventory subscale ≥4, and analyses were also repeated using a less stringent cutoff of ≥1. Both MoCA and comprehensive neuropsychological testing were used as appropriate to the model. Depression was assessed using the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Cross-sectional Bayesian regressions were conducted, and a multistate predictive model was used to identify factors that predict the initial onset of apathy in nonapathetic PD, while also accounting for the competing risk of death. The relationship between apathy presence and mortality was also investigated.
Three hundred forty-six people with PD followed up for up to 14 years across a total of 1,392 sessions were included. Apathy occurrence did not vary significantly across the disease course (disease duration odds ratio [OR] = 0.55, [95% CI 0.28-1.12], affecting approximately 11% or 22% of people at any time depending on the NPI cutoff used. Its presence was associated with a significantly higher risk of death after controlling for all other factors (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.92 [1.50-5.66]). Lower cognition, higher depression levels, and greater motor severity predicted apathy development in those without motivational deficits (HR [cognition] = 0.66 [0.48-0.90], HR [depression] = 1.45 [1.04-2.02], HR [motor severity] = 1.37 [1.01-1.86]). Cognition and depression were also associated with apathy cross-sectionally, along with male sex and possibly lower dopaminergic therapy level, but apathy still occurred across the full spectrum of each variable (OR [cognition] = 0.58 [0.44-0.76], OR [depression] = 1.43 [1.04-1.97], OR [female sex] = 0.45 [0.22-0.92], and OR [levodopa equivalent dose] = 0.78 [0.59-1.04].
Apathy occurs across the PD time course and is associated with higher mortality. Depressive symptoms and cognitive impairment in particular predict its future development in those with normal motivation.
深入了解帕金森病(PD)患者淡漠的自然病史,是开发有效临床管理工具的基础。然而,目前缺乏大型纵向研究,而文献对横断面关联的描述也不一致。我们旨在使用复杂的贝叶斯建模技术,在一个大型 PD 患者队列中确定淡漠发展的纵向预测因素及其随时间的横断面关联和轨迹。
纳入在新西兰帕金森病进展项目的纵向研究中随访的 PD 患者。使用神经精神疾病问卷亚量表≥4 来定义淡漠,分析也使用≥1 的更宽松截点重复进行。MoCA 和全面的神经心理学测试均根据模型适当使用。使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表评估抑郁。进行了横断面贝叶斯回归,使用多状态预测模型来识别在非淡漠 PD 中预测淡漠初始发作的因素,同时考虑死亡的竞争风险。还研究了淡漠存在与死亡率之间的关系。
共纳入 346 名 PD 患者,在总共 1392 次随访中随访时间长达 14 年。在疾病过程中,淡漠的发生没有明显变化(疾病持续时间比值比 [OR] = 0.55 [95%CI 0.28-1.12]),根据使用的 NPI 截断值,任何时候大约有 11%或 22%的患者存在淡漠。在控制所有其他因素后,其存在与更高的死亡风险显著相关(风险比 [HR] = 2.92 [1.50-5.66])。认知能力较低、抑郁水平较高和运动严重程度较高,预测了无动机缺陷患者的淡漠发展(认知 HR = 0.66 [0.48-0.90],抑郁 HR = 1.45 [1.04-2.02],运动严重程度 HR = 1.37 [1.01-1.86])。认知能力和抑郁水平也与淡漠存在横断面相关,以及男性和可能较低的多巴胺能治疗水平,但淡漠仍发生在每个变量的全谱上(认知 OR = 0.58 [0.44-0.76],抑郁 OR = 1.43 [1.04-1.97],女性 OR = 0.45 [0.22-0.92],左旋多巴等效剂量 OR = 0.78 [0.59-1.04])。
淡漠发生在 PD 的整个病程中,与更高的死亡率相关。特别是抑郁症状和认知障碍,预测了在有正常动机的患者中淡漠的未来发展。