Department of Medicine, University of Otago, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch Central, Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand.
Nurse Maude Hospice Palliative Care Service, Nurse Maude Association, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 3;32(6):402. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08604-1.
This study investigated pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) use in people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in New Zealand (NZ) and Australia (AU).
A cross-sectional survey study was conducted using a mixed-media campaign to recruit people with pancreatic cancer and collect information about current PERT use. The questionnaire gathered data on participant demographics, awareness of PERT, prescribing practices and efficacy of enzyme replacement.
Over 300 people with pancreatic cancer were recruited, 135 from New Zealand and 199 from Australia. Every region, state and territory was represented except for the West Coast (NZ) and the Northern Territory (AU), the lowest populated areas in both countries. In New Zealand, 60% of participants had heard about PERT, compared to 69.3% in Australia. Dosing regimens were inconsistent in both countries, with 18% and 27% of participants being prescribed PERT considered best practice in New Zealand and Australia, respectively. Before PERT commencement, 70% of participants experienced symptoms of malabsorption, with all symptoms improving after therapy was established. The majority of participants were compliant with their medication.
PERT use in pancreatic cancer in New Zealand and Australia was highly variable and not compliant with international guidelines in which PERT is recommended as standard therapy. Enzyme replacement is effective for improving the symptoms of malabsorption in patients with pancreatic cancer. Clinician education may be needed to help improve the use of PERT in people with pancreatic cancer.
本研究调查了在新西兰(NZ)和澳大利亚(AU)被诊断患有胰腺癌的人群中使用胰酶替代疗法(PERT)的情况。
采用混合媒体宣传活动进行了一项横断面调查研究,以招募胰腺癌患者并收集有关当前 PERT 使用情况的信息。该问卷收集了参与者人口统计学、对 PERT 的认识、处方实践和酶替代疗效的数据。
共招募了 300 多名胰腺癌患者,其中 135 名来自新西兰,199 名来自澳大利亚。除了两国人口最少的地区——新西兰的西海岸(NZ)和澳大利亚的北领地(NT)外,每个地区、州和地区都有代表。在新西兰,60%的参与者听说过 PERT,而在澳大利亚这一比例为 69.3%。两国的剂量方案不一致,分别有 18%和 27%的参与者在新西兰和澳大利亚被认为是最佳实践处方 PERT。在开始使用 PERT 之前,70%的参与者出现了吸收不良症状,所有症状在开始治疗后都有所改善。大多数参与者都遵守了他们的用药规定。
新西兰和澳大利亚胰腺癌患者中 PERT 的使用情况差异很大,不符合国际指南建议 PERT 作为标准治疗的规定。酶替代疗法对于改善胰腺癌患者吸收不良症状是有效的。可能需要对临床医生进行教育,以帮助改善胰腺癌患者对 PERT 的使用。