Suppr超能文献

在针对个体患者的临床实践中使用患者报告结局指标的感知益处与局限性:定性研究的系统评价

Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

作者信息

Campbell Rachel, Ju Angela, King Madeleine T, Rutherford Claudia

机构信息

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney Quality of Life Office, Sydney, Australia.

The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Nursing Research Unit (CNRU), Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2022 Jun;31(6):1597-1620. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03003-z. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used in clinical settings to inform individual patient care. In-depth understanding of end-users' experiences may help identify factors that promote or hinder their use in clinical decision-making. We aimed to examine stakeholder perceptions of the utility of using PROMs in clinical practice based on real-life experience.

METHODS

Systematic review searching Medline, Embase and PsychINFO from inception to May 2021. Qualitative studies examining patients' and/or clinicians' experiences of using PROMs in clinical settings were included. Study screening and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Qualitative data from included studies was analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Of 2388 abstracts retrieved, 52 articles reporting 50 studies met eligibility. Five key benefits were identified: (1) promotes active patient involvement (enables goal setting and discussion of sensitive topics); (2) enhances the focus of consultations (prioritizes patient needs); (3) improves quality of care (enables tailored, holistic care and prompts action); (4) enables standardized monitoring of patient outcomes; and (5) enhances the patient-clinician relationship (provides reassurance). Perceived limitations included the capacity of PROMs to shift the focus of consultations; inaccurately estimate problems; raise unrealistic expectations for care; inhibit patient-clinician interaction; lack clinically meaningful information; and not be suitable for all patients.

CONCLUSION

Both patients and clinicians reported benefits of using PROMs across diverse health conditions and clinical settings, but also highlighted several limitations. These limitations shed some light on why PROM use may not always improve patient outcomes and provide considerations for the design and implementation of future PROM initiatives.

摘要

目的

患者报告结局测量(PROMs)在临床环境中越来越多地用于指导个体患者的治疗。深入了解终端用户的体验可能有助于识别促进或阻碍其在临床决策中使用的因素。我们旨在基于实际经验,研究利益相关者对在临床实践中使用PROMs的效用的看法。

方法

系统检索从创刊至2021年5月的Medline、Embase和PsychINFO。纳入考察患者和/或临床医生在临床环境中使用PROMs的体验的定性研究。由两名独立评审员进行研究筛选和数据提取。对纳入研究的定性数据进行主题分析。

结果

在检索到的2388篇摘要中,52篇文章报告的50项研究符合纳入标准。确定了五个主要益处:(1)促进患者积极参与(有助于设定目标和讨论敏感话题);(2)加强会诊重点(优先考虑患者需求);(3)提高护理质量(有助于提供个性化、整体护理并促使采取行动);(4)实现对患者结局的标准化监测;(5)加强患者与临床医生的关系(提供安心感)。感知到的局限性包括PROMs转移会诊重点的能力;对问题的估计不准确;对护理产生不切实际的期望;抑制患者与临床医生的互动;缺乏具有临床意义的信息;以及不适用于所有患者。

结论

患者和临床医生均报告了在各种健康状况和临床环境中使用PROMs带来的益处,但也强调了一些局限性。这些局限性揭示了为何使用PROMs可能并不总是能改善患者结局,并为未来PROM计划的设计和实施提供了思考。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验