Melzer Anne C, Campbell Megan E, Hagedorn Hildi J, Fu Steve S
Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Aug;39(11):2079-2086. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08834-3. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
Proactive tobacco treatment programs are an evidence-based strategy to recruit patients who smoke to make supported quit attempts. However, such programs are rarely implemented. We performed a qualitative assessment of clinicians to inform the creation of a proactive outreach program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who smoke.
Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted semi-structured interviews to assess clinician views of proactive outreach, including barriers, program structure, and the use of technology. Clinicians included primary and specialty care physicians, nurses and advanced practice providers, pharmacists, respiratory therapists, a psychologist, and relevant members of leadership. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using directed content analysis.
Clinicians in all roles identified that proactive outreach could be an effective use of resources to help patients with COPD who smoke quit with several advantages over the current state. Clinicians disagreed on the priority population (e.g., younger patients, sicker patients), and to some extent on whether proactive outreach is a clinical priority. Though they supported that technology could be part of the outreach program, most advocated for multiple avenues (phone calls, drop-in clinic, texting), as these patients were perceived to be low technology utilizers. The primary implementation barriers were competing priorities and cost, as well as unclear billing and staffing models.
Clinicians support proactive outreach for patients with COPD, but the optimal way to structure, staff, and fund such programs remains unclear. Health systems should leverage implementation strategies to speed uptake of these potentially life-saving programs.
积极主动的烟草治疗项目是一种循证策略,用于招募吸烟患者进行有支持的戒烟尝试。然而,此类项目很少得到实施。我们对临床医生进行了定性评估,以为创建针对吸烟的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的积极外展项目提供信息。
以实施研究综合框架为指导,我们进行了半结构化访谈,以评估临床医生对积极外展的看法,包括障碍、项目结构和技术应用。临床医生包括初级和专科护理医生、护士及高级执业提供者、药剂师、呼吸治疗师、一名心理学家以及相关领导成员。访谈内容经转录后采用定向内容分析法进行分析。
所有角色的临床医生都认为,积极外展可以有效利用资源,帮助吸烟的COPD患者戒烟,相较于当前状况有诸多优势。临床医生在优先人群(如年轻患者、病情较重的患者)方面存在分歧,在某种程度上,对于积极外展是否为临床优先事项也存在分歧。尽管他们支持技术可以成为外展项目的一部分,但大多数人主张采用多种途径(电话、门诊、短信),因为这些患者被认为技术使用率较低。主要的实施障碍是相互竞争的优先事项和成本,以及计费和人员配置模式不明确。
临床医生支持对COPD患者进行积极外展,但此类项目的最佳组织架构、人员配备和资金筹集方式仍不明确。卫生系统应利用实施策略来加速采用这些可能挽救生命的项目。