• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动烟草治疗在有和无慢性下呼吸道疾病的吸烟者中的比较效果。

Comparative Effectiveness of Proactive Tobacco Treatment among Smokers with and without Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease.

机构信息

1 Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research.

2 Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Mar;15(3):341-347. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201707-582OC.

DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201707-582OC
PMID:29144886
Abstract

RATIONALE

Adults with chronic lower respiratory disease differ in their barriers to smoking cessation but also suffer from tobacco-related health concerns, which may motivate quit attempts. Few studies have examined differences in tobacco treatment response between smokers with and without chronic lower respiratory disease.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the effectiveness of a proactive outreach program for cessation among smokers with and without chronic lower respiratory disease.

METHODS

Subgroup analysis of the Veterans Victory over Tobacco Study, a pragmatic randomized controlled trial that demonstrated the effectiveness of proactive outreach and the choice of tobacco treatments compared with usual care. Smokers identified via the electronic medical record were proactively offered phone-based counseling and care coordination to receive medication from their Veterans Affairs providers or in-person care. We compared the response among those with and without an International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision diagnosis of a chronic lower respiratory disease (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, asthma). We used stratification by propensity scores to adjust for imbalanced covariates between groups with and without chronic lower respiratory disease within each treatment arm, using complete case analysis accounting for the stratified sampling by site.

RESULTS

The study participants were predominantly older, white, male smokers. Overall, 19.6% had chronic lower respiratory disease. A total of 3,307 had outcome data with the following assignments to the intervention: proactive care: n = 1,272 without chronic lower respiratory disease, n = 301 with chronic lower respiratory disease; usual care: n = 1,387 without chronic lower respiratory disease, n = 347 with chronic lower respiratory disease. A total of 1,888 had both complete baseline and outcome data and were included in the primary analysis. In unadjusted analyses (n = 3,307), among individuals with chronic lower respiratory disease, 13.1% in the proactive group reported 6-month prolonged abstinence compared with 8.7% of those in the usual care group (odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-2.65). Among individuals without chronic lower respiratory disease, 13.1% quit in the proactive group compared with 11.0% in the usual care group (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.55). In adjusted analyses (n = 1,888), the association between treatment arm and quit rate varied by the presence of chronic lower respiratory disease, with a stronger association between allocation to the proactive group and quit rate among those with chronic lower respiratory disease (odds ratio, 3.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-7.47) than those without chronic lower respiratory disease (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.88; P for interaction with chronic lower respiratory disease = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Smokers with chronic lower respiratory disease may be more likely to respond to a proactive outreach intervention for tobacco cessation treatment than those without chronic lower respiratory disease. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00608426).

摘要

背景

患有慢性下呼吸道疾病的成年人在戒烟障碍方面存在差异,但也同样受到与烟草相关的健康问题的困扰,这些问题可能会促使他们尝试戒烟。很少有研究调查过有和没有慢性下呼吸道疾病的吸烟者在烟草治疗反应方面的差异。

目的

我们研究了针对有和没有慢性下呼吸道疾病的吸烟者的戒烟主动外展计划的有效性。

方法

退伍军人战胜烟草研究的亚组分析,这是一项实用随机对照试验,证明了主动外展和选择烟草治疗的有效性,与常规护理相比。通过电子病历确定的吸烟者会被主动提供基于电话的咨询和护理协调,以从他们的退伍军人事务提供者那里获得药物或进行面对面的护理。我们比较了那些有和没有国际疾病分类,第 9 版慢性下呼吸道疾病(慢性阻塞性肺疾病、慢性支气管炎、肺气肿、哮喘)诊断的人之间的反应。我们使用倾向评分分层来调整每个治疗臂中患有和不患有慢性下呼吸道疾病的组之间不平衡的协变量,使用完整案例分析考虑到站点的分层抽样。

结果

研究参与者主要是年龄较大、白人、男性吸烟者。总体而言,19.6%的人患有慢性下呼吸道疾病。共有 3307 人有结果数据,并被分配到干预措施中:主动护理:无慢性下呼吸道疾病的 n=1272,有慢性下呼吸道疾病的 n=301;常规护理:无慢性下呼吸道疾病的 n=1387,有慢性下呼吸道疾病的 n=347。共有 1888 人同时具有完整的基线和结果数据,并被纳入主要分析。在未调整的分析(n=3307)中,在患有慢性下呼吸道疾病的人群中,主动组中有 13.1%的人报告在 6 个月时持续戒断,而常规护理组中只有 8.7%(比值比,1.57;95%置信区间,0.93-2.65)。在没有慢性下呼吸道疾病的人群中,主动组中有 13.1%的人戒烟,而常规护理组中有 11.0%(比值比,1.22;95%置信区间,0.95-1.55)。在调整后的分析(n=1888)中,治疗臂与戒烟率之间的关联因慢性下呼吸道疾病的存在而有所不同,在患有慢性下呼吸道疾病的人群中,主动组与戒烟率之间的关联更强(比值比,3.45;95%置信区间,1.59-7.47),而在没有慢性下呼吸道疾病的人群中(比值比,1.34;95%置信区间,0.95-1.88;与慢性下呼吸道疾病的交互作用 P 值=0.03)。

结论

患有慢性下呼吸道疾病的吸烟者可能比没有慢性下呼吸道疾病的吸烟者更有可能对主动外展戒烟治疗做出反应。临床试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 注册(NCT 00608426)。

相似文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Proactive Tobacco Treatment among Smokers with and without Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease.主动烟草治疗在有和无慢性下呼吸道疾病的吸烟者中的比较效果。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Mar;15(3):341-347. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201707-582OC.
2
Proactive tobacco treatment and population-level cessation: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.主动烟草治疗和人群水平戒烟:一项实用随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):671-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.177.
3
Proactive tobacco treatment for individuals with and without a mental health diagnosis: Secondary analysis of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.针对有和没有精神健康诊断个体的主动烟草治疗:一项实用随机对照试验的二次分析。
Addict Behav. 2018 Jan;76:15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.07.024. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
4
Population-based tobacco treatment: study design of a randomized controlled trial.基于人群的烟草治疗:一项随机对照试验的研究设计。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 6;12:159. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-159.
5
Effectiveness of Proactive Tobacco Cessation Treatment Outreach Among Smokers With Serious Mental Illness.积极的戒烟治疗外展对有严重精神疾病的吸烟者的效果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Aug 24;22(9):1433-1438. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa013.
6
The Equity Impact of Proactive Outreach to Smokers: Analysis of a Randomized Trial.主动接触吸烟者的公平影响:一项随机试验分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Oct;55(4):506-516. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.023. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
7
Proactive outreach for smokers using VHA mental health clinics: protocol for a patient-randomized clinical trial.利用退伍军人事务部心理健康诊所对吸烟者进行主动干预:一项患者随机临床试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 17;14:1294. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1294.
8
Proactive tobacco treatment offering free nicotine replacement therapy and telephone counselling for socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers: a randomised clinical trial.为社会经济地位不利的吸烟者提供免费尼古丁替代疗法和电话咨询的积极烟草治疗:一项随机临床试验。
Thorax. 2016 May;71(5):446-53. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207904. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
9
Proactive Population Health Strategy to Offer Tobacco Dependence Treatment to Smokers in a Primary Care Practice Network.主动的人群健康策略,为初级保健实践网络中的吸烟者提供烟草依赖治疗。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1571-1577. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05079-3. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
10
Smoking Cessation among Female and Male Veterans before and after a Randomized Trial of Proactive Outreach.随机对照试验前后主动外展对男性和女性退伍军人戒烟的影响
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Jun 25;29 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S15-S23. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.04.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Immediately scheduled for an appointment to smoking cessation clinics: Key to quitting smoking in chronic airway disease - a multicenter randomized study.立即安排到戒烟诊所就诊:慢性气道疾病戒烟的关键——一项多中心随机研究。
Tob Induc Dis. 2025 Jun 5;23. doi: 10.18332/tid/204254. eCollection 2025.
2
A Systematic Review of Codelists to Identify Chronic Bronchitis and Emphysema in Routine Electronic Healthcare Record Data and Derivation of a Standardized Codelist for Future Research.一项关于在常规电子医疗记录数据中识别慢性支气管炎和肺气肿的代码集的系统评价以及用于未来研究的标准化代码集的推导。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 May 23;20:1679-1691. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S501421. eCollection 2025.
3
Prevalence of nicotine dependence among smokers aged 40 years and older in China.
中国40岁及以上吸烟者中尼古丁依赖的患病率。
Chin Med J Pulm Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun 18;2(2):119-131. doi: 10.1016/j.pccm.2024.05.003. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Clinician Views of Proactive Tobacco Treatment Programs: A Qualitative Evaluation.临床医生对积极烟草治疗项目的看法:一项定性评估
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Aug;39(11):2079-2086. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08834-3. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
5
Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.提高初级保健中戒烟率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2.
6
Proactive tobacco treatment for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.对患有创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人进行主动的烟草治疗。
Psychol Trauma. 2021 Jan;13(1):114-122. doi: 10.1037/tra0000613. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
7
Proactive outreach tobacco treatment for socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers with serious mental illness.对患有严重精神疾病的社会经济弱势群体中的吸烟者进行主动外展烟草治疗。
J Behav Med. 2020 Jun;43(3):493-502. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00083-8. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
8
Update in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2018.2018年慢性阻塞性肺疾病的最新进展
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun 15;199(12):1462-1470. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201902-0374UP.
9
Assessment of Self-Management Treatment Needs Among COPD Helpline Callers.评估 COPD 热线呼叫者的自我管理治疗需求。
COPD. 2019 Feb;16(1):82-88. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2019.1575350. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
10
Smoking cessation for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的戒烟
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 20;2016(8):CD010744. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010744.pub2.