Suppr超能文献

非专业顾问干预对高血压结局的影响:一项系统评价、荟萃分析及RE-AIM评估

Lay advisor interventions for hypertension outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and a RE-AIM evaluation.

作者信息

Patil Sonal J, Bhayani Vishwa, Yoshida Yilin, Bushweller Leila, Udoh Eno-Obong, Todorov Irina, Saper Robert, Stange Kurt C, Bolen Shari

机构信息

Center for Health Equity, Engagement, Education, and Research (CHEEER), Department of Family Medicine, The MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.

Department of Public Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 20;11:1305190. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1305190. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Lay advisor interventions improve hypertension outcomes; however, the added benefits and relevant factors for their widespread implementation into health systems are unknown. We performed a systematic review to: (1) summarize the benefits of adding lay advisors to interventions on hypertension outcomes, and (2) summarize factors associated with successful implementation in health systems using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.

METHODS

We systematically searched several databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO from January 1981 to May 2023. All study designs of interventions delivered solely by lay advisors for adults with hypertension were eligible. If both arms received the lay advisor intervention, the study arm with lower intensity was assigned as the low-intensity intervention.

RESULTS

We included 41 articles, of which 22 were RCTs, from 7,267 screened citations. Studies predominantly included socially disadvantaged populations. Meta-analysis (9 RCTs;  = 4,220) of eligible lay advisor interventions reporting outcomes showed improved systolic blood pressure (BP) [-3.72 mm Hg (CI -6.1 to -1.3; 88%)], and diastolic BP [-1.7 mm Hg (CI -1 to -0.9; 7%)] compared to control group. Pooled effect from six RCTs ( = 3,277) comparing high-intensity with low-intensity lay advisor interventions showed improved systolic BP of -3.6 mm Hg (CI -6.7 to -0.5; 82.7%) and improved diastolic BP of -2.1 mm Hg (CI -3.7 to -0.4; 70.9%) with high-intensity interventions. No significant difference in pooled odds of hypertension control was noted between lay advisor intervention and control groups, or between high-intensity and low-intensity intervention groups. Most studies used multicomponent interventions with no stepped care elements or reporting of efficacious components. Indicators of external validity (adoption, implementation, maintenance) were infrequently reported.

DISCUSSION

Lay advisor interventions improve hypertension outcomes, with high intensity interventions having a greater impact. Further studies need to identify successful intervention and implementation factors of multicomponent interventions for stepped upscaling within healthcare system settings as well as factors used to help sustain interventions.

摘要

引言

非专业顾问干预可改善高血压治疗效果;然而,将其广泛应用于卫生系统的额外益处及相关因素尚不清楚。我们进行了一项系统评价,目的是:(1)总结在高血压干预措施中增加非专业顾问的益处,以及(2)使用覆盖范围、有效性、采用率、实施情况、维持情况(RE-AIM)框架总结与在卫生系统中成功实施相关的因素。

方法

我们系统检索了多个数据库,包括1981年1月至2023年5月的Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO。所有仅由非专业顾问为成年高血压患者提供的干预措施的研究设计均符合条件。如果两组均接受非专业顾问干预,则将强度较低的研究组指定为低强度干预组。

结果

我们从7267篇筛选出的文献中纳入了41篇文章,其中22篇为随机对照试验。研究主要纳入了社会弱势群体。对报告结果的符合条件的非专业顾问干预措施进行的荟萃分析(9项随机对照试验;n = 4220)显示,与对照组相比,收缩压有所改善[-3.72毫米汞柱(置信区间-6.1至-1.3;P = 0.003)],舒张压也有所改善[-1.7毫米汞柱(置信区间-1至-0.9;P < 0.001)]。六项随机对照试验(n = 3277)比较高强度与低强度非专业顾问干预措施的合并效应显示,高强度干预措施使收缩压改善了-3.6毫米汞柱(置信区间-6.7至-0.5;P = 0.021),舒张压改善了-2.1毫米汞柱(置信区间-3.7至-0.4;P = 0.014)。非专业顾问干预组与对照组之间,或高强度与低强度干预组之间,高血压控制的合并比值比无显著差异。大多数研究使用的是多成分干预措施,没有逐步护理要素或有效成分的报告。外部效度指标(采用率、实施情况、维持情况)很少被报告。

讨论

非专业顾问干预可改善高血压治疗效果,高强度干预措施的影响更大。进一步的研究需要确定多成分干预措施在医疗系统环境中逐步扩大规模的成功干预和实施因素,以及有助于维持干预措施的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/718b/11144929/f074aac59566/fmed-11-1305190-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验