• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一份用于评估临床实践中心理健康社会决定因素的问卷的开发与内容效度验证。

Development and content validation of a questionnaire to assess the social determinants of mental health in clinical practice.

作者信息

Handerer Fritz, Kinderman Peter, Nevard Imogen, Tai Sara

机构信息

Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Institute of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 20;15:1377751. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1377751. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1377751
PMID:38832330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11145063/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is growing consensus that consideration of the Social Determinants of Mental Health should be at the centre of mental health care provision. To facilitate this, a validated means to assess mental health service users' social contextual information is arguably needed. We therefore developed a questionnaire to assess the Social Determinants of Mental Health in clinical practice.

METHODS

Our guideline-informed development consisted of three steps; i) construct and purpose definition, ii) initial item generation based on the literature, similar questionnaires, and a selection of the ICD-10, iii) evaluation, revision, and content validation of the questionnaire. Initially we developed 249 items that were reduced, revised, and validated in several stages to 73 items. Content validation of the questionnaire was achieved through surveys and focus groups including mental health care service users and professionals.

RESULTS

The surveys and focus groups indicated the need for a standardised assessment of adverse social factors and highlighted that the benefits of such an assessment would be a more holistic approach to identifying and addressing fundamental factors involved in the development of mental health difficulties. Importantly, this study also revealed how any assessment of the Social Determinants of Mental Health must prioritise the assessed person having a central role in the process and control over their own data. The focus groups identified contradicting recommendations regarding the most suitable context to administer the questionnaire.

DISCUSSION

The resulting questionnaire can be considered to be theoretically robust and partially validated. Future research is discussed.

摘要

引言

越来越多的人达成共识,即对心理健康的社会决定因素的考量应处于心理健康护理服务的核心位置。为促成此事,或许需要一种经过验证的方法来评估心理健康服务使用者的社会背景信息。因此,我们开发了一份问卷,用于在临床实践中评估心理健康的社会决定因素。

方法

我们基于指南的开发包括三个步骤;i)构建与目的定义,ii)基于文献、类似问卷以及国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)的部分内容初步生成条目,iii)对问卷进行评估、修订和内容验证。最初我们开发了249个条目,经过几个阶段的删减、修订和验证后,最终确定为73个条目。通过包括心理健康护理服务使用者和专业人员在内的调查及焦点小组实现了问卷的内容验证。

结果

调查和焦点小组表明需要对不良社会因素进行标准化评估,并强调这种评估的好处在于能以更全面的方法来识别和解决心理健康问题发展过程中涉及的基本因素。重要的是,本研究还揭示了对心理健康社会决定因素的任何评估都必须优先考虑被评估者在该过程中发挥核心作用并对其自身数据具有控制权。焦点小组就问卷最适合的施测情境提出了相互矛盾的建议。

讨论

最终形成的问卷在理论上可被认为是稳健的且经过了部分验证。文中还讨论了未来的研究方向。

相似文献

1
Development and content validation of a questionnaire to assess the social determinants of mental health in clinical practice.一份用于评估临床实践中心理健康社会决定因素的问卷的开发与内容效度验证。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 20;15:1377751. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1377751. eCollection 2024.
2
3
4
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
5
Development and validation of a self-report social determinants of health questionnaire in Australia.开发并验证澳大利亚社会健康决定因素自评问卷。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Jun 1;38(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac029.
6
An intervention for parents with severe personality difficulties whose children have mental health problems: a feasibility RCT.一项针对有严重人格障碍且其子女有心理健康问题的父母的干预措施:一项可行性 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(14):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta24140.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
9
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
10
Development of Social Determinants of Health Screening Tool (SDoHST): qualitative validation with stakeholders and patients in South Australia.健康决定因素筛查工具(SDoHST)的制定:南澳大利亚利益相关者和患者的定性验证。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Jan;39(1):131-140. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2144053. Epub 2022 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity and reliability of Household Disinfectants-Cleaners Questionnaire (HDCQ) to investigate public awareness and performance in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi.用于调查阿布扎比酋长国公众认知与行为的家用消毒剂-清洁剂调查问卷(HDCQ)的有效性和可靠性
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 29;25(1):1201. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22317-y.

本文引用的文献

1
When There Is Value in Asking: An Argument for Social Risk Screening in Clinical Practice.何时提问具有价值:关于临床实践中社会风险筛查的争论
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Aug;175(8):1181-1182. doi: 10.7326/M22-0147. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
2
A Scoping Review and Narrative Synthesis Comparing the Constructs of Social Determinants of Health and Social Determinants of Mental Health: Matryoshka or Two Independent Constructs?一项范围综述与叙述性综合分析:比较健康的社会决定因素与心理健康的社会决定因素的概念框架——套娃还是两个独立的概念框架?
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 14;13:848556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.848556. eCollection 2022.
3
Development and content validity of the Experienced Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire (EPAT)-A best practice example for generating patient-reported measures from qualitative data.经验患者中心性问卷(EPAT)的开发和内容效度:从定性数据生成患者报告衡量指标的最佳实践范例。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1529-1538. doi: 10.1111/hex.13494. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
4
Screening and Interventions for Social Risk Factors: Technical Brief to Support the US Preventive Services Task Force.社会风险因素筛查与干预:支持美国预防服务工作组的技术简报
JAMA. 2021 Oct 12;326(14):1416-1428. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12825.
5
Screening and Referral Care Delivery Services and Unmet Health-Related Social Needs: A Systematic Review.筛查和转介护理服务与未满足的健康相关社会需求:系统评价。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Aug 12;18:E78. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200569.
6
The need for improved coding to document the social determinants of health.需要改进编码以记录健康的社会决定因素。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;8(8):653. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00208-X.
7
Minimal use of ICD social determinant or phenomenological codes in mental health care records.在心理健康护理记录中,国际疾病分类(ICD)社会决定因素或现象学编码的使用最少。
J Ment Health. 2023 Feb;32(1):216-225. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1952944. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
8
If social determinants of health are so important, shouldn't we ask patients about them?如果健康的社会决定因素如此重要,我们难道不应该询问患者这些因素吗?
BMJ. 2020 Nov 24;371:m4150. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4150.
9
Translating Social Determinants of Health into Standardized Clinical Entities.将健康的社会决定因素转化为标准化临床实体。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 16;270:474-478. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200205.
10
Documenting social determinants of health-related clinical activities using standardized medical vocabularies.使用标准化医学词汇记录与健康相关临床活动的社会决定因素。
JAMIA Open. 2018 Dec 24;2(1):81-88. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy051. eCollection 2019 Apr.