Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Medical School, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Ioannina, Stavrou Niarchou Avenue, 45500, Ioannina, Greece.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Jun 4;40(1):150. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05732-x.
Recent data highlight the internet's pivotal role as the primary information source for patients. In this study, we emulate a patient's/caregiver's quest for online information concerning chest deformities and assess the quality of available information.
We conducted an internet search using combination of the terms "pectus excavatum," "pectus excavatum surgery," "funnel chest," "pectus excavatum repair" and identified the first 100 relevant websites from the three most popular search engines: Google, Yahoo, and Bing. These websites were evaluated using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) instrument.
Of the 300 websites generated, 140 (46.7%) were included in our evaluation after elimination of duplicates, non-English websites, and those targeting medical professionals. The EQIP scores in the final sample ranged from 8 to 32/36, with a median score of 22. Most of the evaluated websites (32.8%) originated from hospitals, yet none met all 36 EQIP criteria.
None of the evaluated websites pertaining to pectus excavatum achieved a flawless "content quality" score. The diverse array of websites potentially complicates patients' efforts to navigate toward high-quality resources. Barriers in accessing high-quality online patient information may contribute to disparities in referral, patient engagement, treatment satisfaction, and overall quality of life.
IV.
最近的数据强调了互联网作为患者主要信息来源的关键作用。在这项研究中,我们模拟了患者/照顾者对胸部畸形相关在线信息的搜索,并评估了可用信息的质量。
我们使用“漏斗胸”、“漏斗胸手术”、“鸡胸”、“漏斗胸修复”等术语进行了互联网搜索,并从三个最受欢迎的搜索引擎:谷歌、雅虎和必应中选择了前 100 个相关网站。我们使用改良后的 Ensuring Quality Information for Patients(EQIP)工具对这些网站进行了评估。
在生成的 300 个网站中,经过排除重复项、非英语网站和针对医疗专业人员的网站后,有 140 个(46.7%)网站纳入我们的评估。最终样本中的 EQIP 评分范围为 8 至 32/36,中位数为 22。评估的大多数网站(32.8%)来自医院,但没有一个网站符合所有 36 个 EQIP 标准。
没有一个评估的漏斗胸网站达到了完美的“内容质量”评分。这些网站的多样性可能会使患者难以找到高质量的资源。获取高质量在线患者信息的障碍可能导致转诊、患者参与度、治疗满意度和整体生活质量的差异。
IV。