Litovitz T L
Pediatrics. 1985 Mar;75(3):469-76.
Results of 125 battery ingestions in 114 separate episodes over an 11-month period are analyzed. The 125 batteries included 119 button batteries and six cylindrical cells. The location of batteries just prior to ingestion (loose or discarded [48.7%], in product [34.4%], in manufacturer's battery packaging [3.4%]) determined the need for consumer education of this potential hazard. The observation that hearing aid batteries were the most common type swallowed (33.9%), and that 14 batteries were ingested by hearing-impaired children after they removed the batteries from their own aids, further directs appropriate prevention efforts. All the larger cylindrical batteries and 89.9% of the button cells passed through the gastrointestinal tract spontaneously. Endoscopic retrieval was unsuccessful in 66.7% of cases attempted. Ipecac syrup, administered to 11 patients, uniformly failed to expel the battery. Transit time was within 48 hours for 68.8% of button cells, and 85.4% of the batteries were passed by 72 hours, with a range of 12 hours to 14 days. Once beyond the esophagus, arrested battery progression failed to correlate with adverse outcome. Symptoms developed in 11 patients but were only severe in the single case of esophageal lodgment. The vast majority of battery ingestions are benign and can be managed without endoscopic or surgical intervention.
分析了11个月期间114起不同事件中125例电池摄入的结果。125枚电池包括119枚纽扣电池和6枚圆柱形电池。摄入前电池的位置(松散或丢弃[48.7%]、在产品中[34.4%]、在制造商的电池包装中[3.4%])决定了对这种潜在危害进行消费者教育的必要性。助听器电池是最常被吞下的类型(33.9%),且有14枚电池是听力受损儿童从自己的助听器中取出后摄入的,这一观察结果进一步指导了适当的预防措施。所有较大的圆柱形电池和89.9%的纽扣电池自发通过胃肠道。在66.7%的尝试内镜取出的病例中未成功。给11名患者服用了吐根糖浆,但均未能排出电池。68.8%的纽扣电池通过时间在48小时内,85.4%的电池在72小时内排出,时间范围为12小时至14天。一旦电池越过食管,其进展受阻与不良后果无关。11名患者出现了症状,但仅在食管嵌顿的单个病例中症状严重。绝大多数电池摄入是良性的,无需内镜或手术干预即可处理。