• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纽扣电池吞食。56例病例回顾。

Button battery ingestions. A review of 56 cases.

作者信息

Litovitz T L

出版信息

JAMA. 1983 May 13;249(18):2495-500.

PMID:6341633
Abstract

A retrospective analysis of 56 button (miniature) battery ingestions was conducted. This represents the largest series in the literature studying this problem. Impaction of these foreign bodies, most frequently in the esophagus (five cases), was a uniform predictor of severe morbidity. In the remaining 51 cases, the battery traversed the esophagus without incident; only four of these ingestions produced symptoms, and there was only one case with any severe complications. In 33 asymptomatic patients, the battery passed spontaneously through the gastrointestinal tract. Fourteen patients underwent endoscopic or operative procedures or both despite the absence of symptoms. Unanticipated mucosal erosions were noted in seven of these patients, although no symptoms or sequelae developed. Initial chest roentgenogram and observation for symptoms will detect ingestors at risk of complications. Operative or endoscopic intervention should be withheld in the absence of these clinical indicators. Button batteries can routinely be allowed to pass spontaneously.

摘要

对56例纽扣(微型)电池吞食病例进行了回顾性分析。这是文献中研究该问题的最大系列病例。这些异物嵌顿,最常见于食管(5例),是严重发病的一致预测因素。在其余51例中,电池顺利通过食管,这些吞食病例中只有4例出现症状,只有1例出现任何严重并发症。在33例无症状患者中,电池自行通过胃肠道。尽管没有症状,仍有14例患者接受了内镜或手术操作或两者皆有。在这些患者中有7例发现了意外的黏膜糜烂,尽管未出现症状或后遗症。最初的胸部X线检查和症状观察将发现有并发症风险的吞食者。在没有这些临床指标的情况下,应避免进行手术或内镜干预。纽扣电池通常可允许自行通过。

相似文献

1
Button battery ingestions. A review of 56 cases.纽扣电池吞食。56例病例回顾。
JAMA. 1983 May 13;249(18):2495-500.
2
Esophageal button battery ingestions: decreasing time to operative intervention by level I trauma activation.食管纽扣电池摄入:通过一级创伤激活减少手术干预时间。
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Sep;49(9):1360-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.01.050. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
3
Disk battery ingestion. Elevated urine mercury levels and enema removal of battery fragments.
JAMA. 1983 May 13;249(18):2502-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.249.18.2502.
4
Battery ingestions: product accessibility and clinical course.电池摄入:产品可及性与临床病程
Pediatrics. 1985 Mar;75(3):469-76.
5
Severe esophageal damage due to button battery ingestion: can it be prevented?因吞食纽扣电池导致的严重食管损伤:能否预防?
Pediatr Surg Int. 2004 Jul;20(7):496-501. doi: 10.1007/s00383-004-1223-6. Epub 2004 Jun 22.
6
Button battery ingestion: an analysis of 25 cases.纽扣电池吞食:25例病例分析
Chang Gung Med J. 2002 Mar;25(3):169-74.
7
Clinical analysis of disc battery ingestion in children.儿童吞食纽扣电池的临床分析
Chang Gung Med J. 2004 Sep;27(9):673-7.
8
[Ingestion of button batteries. Epidemiology, clinical signs and therapeutic recommendations].[纽扣电池摄入。流行病学、临床症状及治疗建议]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Feb 25;164(9):1204-7.
9
Identifying predictive factors for long-term complications following button battery impactions: A case series and literature review.确定纽扣电池嵌塞后长期并发症的预测因素:病例系列研究与文献综述
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Aug;87:198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
10
Characteristics and outcome of impacted button batteries among young children less than 7 years of age in China: a retrospective analysis of 116 cases.中国 7 岁以下儿童中纽扣电池嵌顿的特征和结局:116 例回顾性分析。
World J Pediatr. 2018 Dec;14(6):570-575. doi: 10.1007/s12519-018-0188-9. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Intestinal volvulus and obstruction due to combined button battery and magnet ingestion: a medico-legal case report.因同时吞食纽扣电池和磁铁导致的肠扭转和肠梗阻:一例法医学病例报告。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2025 Sep 6. doi: 10.1007/s12024-025-01078-5.
2
Complications of button battery ingestion or insertion in children: a systematic review and pooled analysis of individual patient-level data.儿童纽扣电池吞食或插入的并发症:系统评价和个体患者水平数据的汇总分析。
World J Pediatr. 2024 Oct;20(10):1017-1028. doi: 10.1007/s12519-024-00833-y. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
3
Imaging button battery ingestions and insertions in children: a 15-year single-center review.
儿童纽扣电池摄入与插入的影像学研究:一项为期15年的单中心回顾
Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Feb;47(2):178-185. doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3751-3. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
4
Button battery induced traumatic tracheoesophageal fistula: Case report and review of literature.纽扣电池致外伤性气管食管瘘:病例报告及文献复习
Sudan J Paediatr. 2011;11(2):43-9.
5
Foreign Body Ingestion in Children: Should Button Batteries in the Stomach Be Urgently Removed?儿童异物摄入:胃内纽扣电池是否应紧急取出?
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2016 Mar;19(1):20-8. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2016.19.1.20. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Button Battery Ingestion in Children: A Paradigm for Management of Severe Pediatric Foreign Body Ingestions.儿童纽扣电池摄入:严重小儿异物摄入管理的范例
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2016 Jan;26(1):99-118. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2015.08.003.
7
Severe esophageal injuries caused by accidental button battery ingestion in children.儿童意外吞食纽扣电池导致的严重食管损伤。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2014 Oct;7(4):316-21. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.142773.
8
Simple battery armor to protect against gastrointestinal injury from accidental ingestion.用于防止意外摄入造成胃肠道损伤的简易电池防护装置。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 18;111(46):16490-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418423111. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
9
Clinical evaluation of disc battery ingestion in children.儿童吞食纽扣电池的临床评估。
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2012 Apr;4(2):107-10.
10
Delayed presentation of severe ocular injury from a button battery.纽扣电池所致严重眼外伤的延迟就诊
BMJ Case Rep. 2013 May 2;2013:bcr2013009094. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-009094.