• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国碳普惠体系能否降低城镇居民碳排放?来自准自然实验的证据。

Can China's carbon generalized system of preferences reduce urban residents' carbon emissions? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment.

机构信息

Joint National-Local Engineering Research Centre for Safe and Precise Coal Mining, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui, 232001, China; School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyun, 030324, Shanxi province, China.

School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyun, 030324, Shanxi province, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;362:121222. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121222. Epub 2024 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121222
PMID:38833928
Abstract

The carbon generalized system of preferences (CGSP) is an innovative incentive mechanism implemented by the Chinese government, which has also become an important part of carbon emission reduction at the living end, and it is of great significance to study whether the Pilot Policy can reduce the carbon emissions of residents. This study firstly accounts for the total carbon emissions and per capita carbon emissions of the residents of 284 cities in China, and on this basis, adopts the SCM method to quantitatively study and analyze the overall and local implementation effects of CGSP in China by taking the first batch of CGSP pilots in China as an example, and further applies the mediation effect model to test the pathways of the role of CGSP. The main findings of the study are as follows: (1) During the period of 2010-2020, the total carbon emissions from urban residents' living in China showed a yearly growth trend, from 36,623.98 ×10Mt in 2010-85,241.20 ×10Mt in 2020, an increase of 8.83%. Total carbon emissions present a structural difference of "electricity consumption > central heating > private transport > gas (oil, natural gas) consumption". (2) Overall, the implementation of the CGSP had a robust positive impact on the overall carbon emission reduction in the pilot cities, with an average annual emission reduction effect value of 36.53 ×10Mt. Locally, the annual net policy effect values of Dongguan, Zhongshan, Heyuan, and Guangzhou are 6169.79 ×10, 26,600.17 ×10, 17,081.34 ×10 and 9393.36 ×10Mt respectively. (3) CGSP has a good carbon emission reduction effect by suppressing the impact on residents' carbon emissions through enhancing the city's innovation capacity and promoting electricity saving and consumption reduction, while the mediating effect played by the promotion of green and low-carbon travel in the pilot policy is not significant. Finally, based on the research findings, relevant suggestions are targeted.

摘要

碳普惠系统是中国政府实施的一项创新性激励机制,也是生活端减碳的重要内容,研究该政策能否降低居民碳排放具有重要意义。本文首先核算了中国 284 个城市居民的碳排放量和人均碳排放量,在此基础上,采用 SCM 方法,以中国首批碳普惠试点为例,定量研究和分析 CGSP 在全国的整体和局部实施效果,并进一步应用中介效应模型检验 CGSP 的作用路径。研究主要结论如下:(1)2010—2020 年中国城镇居民生活碳排放量呈逐年增长趋势,由 2010 年的 36623.98×10t 增长至 2020 年的 85241.20×10t,增长了 8.83%。碳排放量结构存在“用电>集中供暖>私人交通>燃气(油、天然气)消费”的差异。(2)总体来看,碳普惠政策的实施对试点城市的整体碳减排具有显著的正向促进作用,平均每年的减排效应值为 365.30×10t。局部来看,东莞、中山、河源、广州的政策年度净效应值分别为 6169.79×10t、26600.17×10t、17081.34×10t、9393.36×10t。(3)碳普惠政策通过提升城市创新能力和促进节电减排,抑制了对居民碳排放量的影响,具有较好的减排效果,而试点政策中绿色低碳出行的促进作用发挥的中介效应不显著。最后,根据研究结论提出了相关建议。

相似文献

1
Can China's carbon generalized system of preferences reduce urban residents' carbon emissions? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment.中国碳普惠体系能否降低城镇居民碳排放?来自准自然实验的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;362:121222. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121222. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
2
A new carbon emission reduction mechanism: Carbon Generalized System of Preferences (CGSP).一种新的碳排放减排机制:碳普遍优惠制(CGSP)。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jan;28(1):1267-1274. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11670-7. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
3
Does low-carbon pilot city policy induce low-carbon choices in residents' living: Holistic and single dual perspective.低碳试点城市政策是否能引导居民的低碳生活选择:整体和单一双重视角。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 15;324:116353. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116353. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
4
Better cities better lives: How low-carbon city pilots can lower residents' carbon emissions.更美好的城市,更美好的生活:低碳城市试点如何降低居民碳排放。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;351:119889. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119889. Epub 2024 Jan 1.
5
Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of carbon emissions from civil buildings: Evidence from urban China.民用建筑碳排放的时空特征及影响因素分析——来自中国城市的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 4;17(8):e0272295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272295. eCollection 2022.
6
China's efforts towards carbon neutrality: Does energy-saving and emission-reduction policy mitigate carbon emissions?中国迈向碳中和的努力:节能和减排政策是否减轻了碳排放?
J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 15;316:115286. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115286. Epub 2022 May 20.
7
Innovation-driven development and urban carbon emission reduction: a quasi-natural experiment in China.创新驱动发展与城市碳排放 reduction:中国的一项准自然实验。 (注:原文中“carbon emission reduction”表述有误,正确的应该是“carbon emission reduction”,即“碳排放减少” ,翻译后的句子中“reduction”未翻译完整,推测是原文表述有误导致。) 正确译文:创新驱动发展与城市碳排放减少:中国的一项准自然实验。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(3):8002-8019. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22712-7. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
8
Residents' willingness to engage in carbon generalized system of preferences - A personality insight study based on the extended theory of planned behavior.居民参与碳普惠意愿的人格洞察研究——基于扩展计划行为理论。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;361:121224. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121224. Epub 2024 May 28.
9
The impact of China's low-carbon city pilot policy on carbon emissions: based on the multi-period DID model.中国低碳城市试点政策对碳排放的影响:基于多期 DID 模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(34):81745-81759. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20188-z. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
10
Carbon emission reduction effects of green finance reform and innovation pilot zones policy: evidence from the prefecture-level city in China.绿色金融改革创新试验区政策的碳减排效应:来自中国地级市的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(46):102624-102640. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29505-6. Epub 2023 Sep 5.