Jeyaraman Madhan, Jeyaraman Naveen, Jayakumar Tarun, Ramasubramanian Swaminathan, Ranjan Rajni, Jha Saurabh Kumar, Gupta Ashim
Department of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600077, India.
Department of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201310, India.
World J Orthop. 2024 May 18;15(5):457-468. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i5.457.
Current osteoarthritis (OA) treatments focus on symptom relief without addressing the underlying disease process. In regenerative medicine, current treatments have limitations. In regenerative medicine, more research is needed for intra-articular stromal vascular fraction (SVF) injections in OA, including dosage optimization, long-term efficacy, safety, comparisons with other treatments, and mechanism exploration.
To compare the efficacy of intra-articular SVF with corticosteroid (ICS) injections in patients with primary knee OA.
The study included 50 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grades II and III OA. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either a single intra-articular SVF injection (group A) or a single intra-articular ICS (triamcinolone) (group B) injection. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Visual analog score (VAS) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were administered before the procedure and at all follow-ups. The safety of SVF in terms of adverse and severe adverse events was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Version 26.0, IBM Corp, Chicago, IL, United States.
Both groups had similar demographics and baseline clinical characteristics. Follow-up showed minor patient loss, resulting in 23 and 24 in groups A and B respectively. Group A experienced a notable reduction in pain, with VAS scores decreasing from 7.7 to 2.4 over 24 months, compared to a minor reduction from 7.8 to 6.2 in Group B. This difference in pain reduction in group A was statistically significant from the third month onwards. Additionally, Group A showed significant improvements in knee functionality, with IKDC scores rising from 33.4 to 83.10, whereas Group B saw a modest increase from 36.7 to 45.16. The improvement in Group A was statistically significant from 6 months and maintained through 24 months.
Our study demonstrated that intra-articular administration of SVF can lead to reduced pain and improved knee function in patients with primary knee OA. More adequately powered, multi-center, double-blinded, randomised clinical trials with longer follow-ups are needed to further establish safety and justify its clinical use.
目前骨关节炎(OA)的治疗主要集中在缓解症状,而未针对潜在的疾病进程。在再生医学领域,当前的治疗方法存在局限性。对于骨关节炎关节内注射基质血管成分(SVF),在再生医学中仍需要更多研究,包括剂量优化、长期疗效、安全性、与其他治疗方法的比较以及作用机制探索。
比较关节内注射SVF与皮质类固醇(ICS)对原发性膝骨关节炎患者的疗效。
该研究纳入了50例Kellgren-Lawrence分级为II级和III级的骨关节炎患者。患者被随机分配(1:1)接受单次关节内SVF注射(A组)或单次关节内ICS(曲安奈德)注射(B组)。在1、3、6、12和24个月对患者进行随访。在手术前及所有随访时进行视觉模拟评分(VAS)和国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分。记录SVF在不良和严重不良事件方面的安全性。使用美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥市IBM公司的SPSS 26.0版本进行统计分析。
两组患者的人口统计学和基线临床特征相似。随访显示患者流失较少,A组和B组分别剩余23例和24例。A组疼痛明显减轻,VAS评分在24个月内从7.7降至2.4,而B组仅从7.8小幅降至6.2。从第三个月起,A组疼痛减轻的差异具有统计学意义。此外,A组膝关节功能显著改善,IKDC评分从33.4升至83.10,而B组仅从36.7小幅升至45.16。A组的改善从6个月起具有统计学意义,并持续至24个月。
我们的研究表明,关节内注射SVF可减轻原发性膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛并改善膝关节功能。需要开展更多样本量充足、多中心、双盲、随机的长期随访临床试验,以进一步确定其安全性并证明其临床应用的合理性。