Darowski M, Hedenstierna G, Baehrendtz S
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1985 Jan;29(1):61-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1985.tb02160.x.
Differential ventilation with selective positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was studied in a two-compartment lung model, using one ventilator and a flow-dividing unit consisting of inspiratory flow resistors and an inspiratory threshold valve. The compliance of each lung compartment was varied between 0.15 and 0.23 1 X kPa-1 and the resistance was varied from 0 to 3.5 kPa X 1(-1) X s. The minute volume was 12 1 and the respiratory frequency 12/min, with an inspiratory:expiratory ratio of 1:2. An even distribution of ventilation to the two lung compartments was obtained with the inspiratory flow resistors or the threshold valve under all conditions studied. However, a stepwise increase in the inspiratory resistance of one lung compartment from 1.0 to 2.5 or from 2.5 to 3.5 kPa X 1(-1) X s required readjustment of the inspiratory flow resistor to achieve an even distribution of ventilation, whereas the inspiratory threshold valve needed no readjustment. Large differences in the inspiratory impedance of the two lung compartments caused asynchronous gas delivery when the ventilation distribution was adjusted by means of the flow resistors. Use of the threshold valve resulted in synchronous gas delivery. The flow-dividing unit consists of non-active elements and can thus be connected to any ventilator.
在一个双室肺模型中,使用一台呼吸机和一个由吸气流量电阻器及吸气阈值阀组成的分流装置,对采用选择性呼气末正压(PEEP)的差异通气进行了研究。每个肺室的顺应性在0.15至0.23 l×kPa⁻¹之间变化,阻力在0至3.5 kPa×l⁻¹×s之间变化。分钟通气量为12 l,呼吸频率为12次/分钟,吸呼比为1:2。在所研究的所有条件下,通过吸气流量电阻器或阈值阀可实现通气在两个肺室的均匀分布。然而,当一个肺室的吸气阻力从1.0逐步增加到2.5或从2.5增加到3.5 kPa×l⁻¹×s时,需要重新调整吸气流量电阻器以实现通气的均匀分布,而吸气阈值阀则无需重新调整。当通过流量电阻器调节通气分布时,两个肺室吸气阻抗的巨大差异会导致气体输送不同步。使用阈值阀可实现气体同步输送。该分流装置由无源元件组成,因此可连接到任何呼吸机上。